Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs TCL 50 SE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
TCL 50 SE
TCL 50 SE
Tcl

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 April 8, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 105.57 cm³ 102.86 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 204 g 195 g
Height 162.8 mm 168.2 mm
Width 75.4 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Space Gray
  • Midnight Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 86 %
Pixel Density 526 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits 550 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 108.99 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.88 mAh/cm³ 48.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5010 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G88 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5 ProTCL 50 SEPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6168.2 x 75.5 x 8.1Poco F5 Pro is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)204195Negligible weight difference in practical use.
Fingerprint SensorUnder displaySide-mountedPreference-based; under-display considered more modern.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDIPS LCDPoco F5 Pro offers significantly better contrast, colors, and viewing angles due to AMOLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.676.78TCL 50 SE has a slightly larger screen.
Resolution1440 x 32001080 x 2460Poco F5 Pro has a much sharper display with higher pixel density (526 ppi vs 396 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090Poco F5 Pro provides smoother scrolling and animations.
HDRDolby Vision, HDR10+NonePoco F5 Pro supports HDR content for a wider dynamic range and more vibrant visuals.
Peak Brightness (nits)1400550Poco F5 Pro is significantly brighter, ensuring better visibility in sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Helio G88Poco F5 Pro offers vastly superior processing power for demanding tasks and gaming due to the flagship Snapdragon chipset.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Poco F5 Pro's CPU architecture and clock speeds translate to significantly faster and more responsive performance.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G52 MC2Poco F5 Pro's GPU provides a much better gaming experience with higher frame rates and detail.
RAM8/12GB4/6GBPoco F5 Pro offers more RAM for better multitasking and app performance.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450Both offer high megapixel counts, but image quality depends on sensor size and processing.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsPoco F5 Pro allows for much higher resolution video recording.
Camera FeaturesOIS, EISPoco F5 Pro has Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for steadier videos and better low-light photos.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)51605010Similar battery capacities; real-world battery life depends on usage and optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset offers a huge performance advantage for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications.
  • Superior display: The AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate and HDR support provides a vastly improved visual experience.
  • Better camera capabilities: Higher resolution video recording, OIS for stable footage, and potentially better image quality due to the higher-end sensor.

TCL 50 SE Advantages:

  • Lower price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Slightly larger display: Offers a marginally larger screen size for media consumption.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and advanced camera features. Suitable for gamers, power users, and content creators.

TCL 50 SE: Best suited for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. A good option for casual users who don't need top-tier performance.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F5 Pro is significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the TCL 50 SE is sufficient. For demanding tasks and gaming, the Poco F5 Pro is necessary.
  3. How important is display quality and camera performance? The Poco F5 Pro offers a substantially better experience in both areas.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

While the TCL 50 SE offers excellent value for its price, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is the clear winner for me. The significantly superior performance, stunning AMOLED display, and enhanced camera capabilities outweigh the price difference. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ensures a future-proof experience, handling demanding tasks and games with ease for years to come. The 120Hz AMOLED screen provides a noticeable difference in daily use with smooth scrolling and vibrant visuals. As someone who values a smooth and responsive user experience, along with high-quality media consumption and occasional gaming, the Poco F5 Pro aligns perfectly with my needs. The TCL 50 SE is a great budget option, but the compromises in performance and display are too significant for my personal preferences.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.