Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Motorola Moto G54 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 September 5, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 105.57 cm³ 95.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.67 "/g
Weight 204 g 177 g
Height 162.8 mm 161.6 mm
Width 75.4 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Midnight blue
  • Indigo blue
  • Glacier blue
  • Mint green

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 526 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.88 mAh/cm³ 52.41 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5 ProMotorola Moto G54Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6161.6 x 73.8 x 8Poco F5 Pro is slightly larger. Negligible difference in practical use.
Weight (g)204177Moto G54 is noticeably lighter, more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDIPS LCDPoco F5 Pro offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and higher peak brightness, resulting in a superior visual experience.
Display Size (inches)6.676.5Poco F5 Pro has a slightly larger screen.
Resolution1440 x 32001080 x 2400Poco F5 Pro has a significantly sharper display (526 ppi vs 405 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
HDRDolby Vision, HDR10+NonePoco F5 Pro supports HDR content for a wider dynamic range and more vibrant colors in compatible videos.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)Dimensity 7020 (6 nm)Poco F5 Pro offers significantly faster CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz...)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz...)Poco F5 Pro has a more powerful CPU architecture.
GPUAdreno 730IMG BXM-8-256Poco F5 Pro offers a considerably more powerful GPU, beneficial for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM8/12GB8/12GBBoth offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking. Poco F5 Pro might have faster RAM speeds due to the chipset
Camera
Main Camera64MP (OV64B)50MPPoco F5 Pro has a higher resolution main sensor, potentially capturing more detail. Sensor quality information for G54 is missing.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 1080p@60fpsPoco F5 Pro offers significantly higher resolution video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity5160 mAh5000 mAhPoco F5 Pro has a slightly larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 outperforms the Dimensity 7020 by a large margin.
  • Superior display: AMOLED with higher resolution, HDR support, and higher peak brightness.
  • Higher resolution video recording: Up to 8K vs 1080p on the Moto G54.

Motorola Moto G54 Advantages:

  • Lighter and potentially more comfortable to hold.
  • Lower price: Expected to be significantly cheaper.

Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Price: Poco F5 Pro offers much better performance but at a higher price.
  • Display Quality vs. Battery Life: AMOLED displays generally consume more power than IPS LCDs, though this can vary.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: Users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and advanced camera features. Ideal for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and media consumption.

Motorola Moto G54: Users on a tighter budget who prioritize basic functionality, a long-lasting battery, and a lightweight design. Suitable for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and casual photography.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F5 Pro is significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming, media consumption, and demanding tasks benefit from the Poco F5 Pro's performance.
  3. Do you prioritize display quality or battery life? The Poco F5 Pro has a superior display but might have slightly reduced battery life compared to the Moto G54.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Poco F5 Pro for its powerful GPU and sharp display.
  • Casual User: Moto G54 for its affordability and long battery life.
  • Photographer/Videographer: Poco F5 Pro for its higher resolution camera and video capabilities.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

While the Motorola Moto G54 offers excellent value for its price, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro. The significantly superior performance, stunning AMOLED display, and advanced camera features are crucial for my usage. I prioritize a smooth and responsive experience for demanding tasks and media consumption, and I am willing to pay the premium for the Poco F5 Pro's capabilities. The slightly larger size and potentially marginally lower battery life are acceptable trade-offs for the significant performance gains and superior visual experience. The higher resolution video recording is also a significant factor for me. While the Moto G54 is a good budget option, the Poco F5 Pro offers a significant jump in overall quality and user experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.