Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Motorola Moto G34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 December 29, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 105.57 cm³ 97.1 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 204 g 179 g
Height 162.8 mm 162.7 mm
Width 75.4 mm 74.6 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Ice Blue
  • Ocean Green
  • Charcoal Black
  • Vanilla Cream

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 84 %
Pixel Density 526 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.88 mAh/cm³ 51.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5 ProMotorola Moto G34Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6162.7 x 74.6 x 8.0Negligible size difference in practical use.
Weight (g)204179Poco F5 Pro feels slightly more substantial, G34 is noticeably lighter.
BuildMissingMissingBuild quality and materials cannot be compared.
Display
TypeAMOLEDIPS LCDPoco F5 Pro offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency in dark mode due to AMOLED technology.
Size (inches)6.676.5Poco F5 Pro provides a slightly larger viewing area.
Resolution1440 x 3200720 x 1600Significantly sharper and more detailed visuals on the Poco F5 Pro (526 ppi vs 270 ppi). Impacts clarity of text, images, and videos.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both phones offer smooth scrolling and animations.
HDRDolby Vision, HDR10+None specifiedSuperior dynamic range and color accuracy on the Poco F5 Pro when viewing HDR content.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Snapdragon 695 5GPoco F5 Pro boasts significantly faster CPU and GPU performance, enabling smoother multitasking, demanding gaming, and faster app loading.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Considerably faster processing power on the Poco F5 Pro.
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 619Much more powerful graphics processing on the Poco F5 Pro, beneficial for gaming and graphically intensive tasks.
RAM8/12GB4/8GBMore RAM on the Poco F5 Pro ensures smoother multitasking and prevents apps from closing in the background.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450Higher resolution on the Poco F5 Pro, but image quality depends on sensor and processing.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsPoco F5 Pro offers much higher resolution video recording capabilities.
Other FeaturesOIS, wider range of lensesLimited information availablePoco F5 Pro likely offers better low-light performance and versatility due to OIS and additional lenses.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)51605000Slightly larger battery on the Poco F5 Pro. Real-world battery life depends on usage patterns and optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor and GPU for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher Resolution Display: Sharper, more detailed visuals with vibrant colors and HDR support.
  • Advanced Camera System: Higher resolution sensor, 8K video recording, and optical image stabilization.

Motorola Moto G34 Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Lower Price: Offers a more budget-friendly option.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and advanced camera features. Suitable for gamers, power users, and content creators.

Motorola Moto G34: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality, long battery life, and a lightweight design. Good for everyday communication, web browsing, and light media consumption.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F5 Pro is significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and content creation benefit from the Poco F5 Pro's power, while basic tasks are handled well by the G34.
  3. Do you prioritize display quality and camera capabilities? The Poco F5 Pro excels in these areas.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

While the Motorola Moto G34 offers a compelling value proposition for budget-conscious buyers, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is the clear winner for me. The significant difference in performance, display quality, and camera capabilities justifies the higher price. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a substantial performance advantage that will future-proof the device for demanding applications and games. The vibrant AMOLED display with a high refresh rate and HDR support offers a superior visual experience. As someone who values a smooth and responsive user experience and appreciates high-quality media consumption, the Poco F5 Pro's advantages are compelling. The slightly heavier weight is a minor trade-off for the substantial gains in performance and features.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.