Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 June 2, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 105.57 cm³ 110.53 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.27 "/g
Weight 204 g 202 g
Height 162.8 mm 162.8 mm
Width 75.4 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 9.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Cosmic Black
  • Rose Champagne

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 87.5 %
Pixel Density 526 PPI 399 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.88 mAh/cm³ 45.23 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5 ProMotorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6162.8 x 73.8 x 9.2Poco F5 Pro slightly slimmer, Moto G Stylus thicker. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)204202Virtually identical weight.
Fingerprint SensorUnder-displaySide-mountedPreference-based. Under-display feels more modern, side-mounted potentially faster unlock.
StylusNoYesSignificant difference. Stylus enables note-taking, sketching, precise interactions.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.6Negligible size difference.
Resolution1440 x 32001080 x 2400Poco F5 Pro significantly sharper (526 ppi vs 399 ppi). Noticeably crisper text and images.
Panel TypeAMOLEDIPS LCDMajor impact on visual experience. AMOLED offers deeper blacks, vibrant colors, higher contrast, and potential for always-on display.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
HDRDolby Vision, HDR10+None specifiedPoco F5 Pro offers superior HDR support for compatible content (brighter highlights, wider color gamut).
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Snapdragon 6 Gen 1Massive performance difference. Poco F5 Pro significantly faster and more powerful for demanding tasks (gaming, video editing).
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz X2 & 3x2.5 GHz A710 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz A78 & 4x1.8 GHz A55)Poco F5 Pro boasts a more powerful CPU architecture resulting in smoother multitasking and faster app loading.
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 710Poco F5 Pro offers better graphics performance for smoother gaming and faster image processing.
RAM (GB)8/124/6/8More RAM in higher-end Poco F5 Pro configurations enables better multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450Both offer high resolution. Image quality depends more on sensor and processing.
Ultrawide (MP)88Similar resolution. Practical difference likely in lens quality and image processing.
Macro (MP)2Combined with ultrawideDedicated macro lens on Poco F5 Pro potentially offers better macro shots. Moto G Stylus combines macro with ultrawide, potentially compromising quality.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 4K@30fpsPoco F5 Pro offers higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)51605000Similar battery capacities. Real-world battery life depends on usage and optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a vastly superior performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Sharper and more vibrant display: AMOLED with higher resolution delivers a superior visual experience.
  • Higher resolution video recording: Up to 8K recording.
  • Dedicated macro lens: Potentially better macro photography.

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) Advantages:

  • Integrated stylus: Enables note-taking, drawing, and precise interactions.
  • Potentially lower price: Depending on configuration, could be significantly cheaper.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: Ideal for power users, gamers, and those who prioritize performance and a premium display. Excellent for demanding tasks, multimedia consumption, and mobile gaming.

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023): Ideal for students, artists, and note-takers who value the integrated stylus. Suitable for everyday tasks, media consumption, and creative endeavors. Less suitable for demanding gaming.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F5 Pro is generally more expensive.
  2. Do you need a stylus? This is a major differentiating feature.
  3. What is your primary use case? Demanding tasks and gaming vs. note-taking and everyday use.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

While the stylus on the Moto G Stylus is a compelling feature for certain users, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro's superior performance, stunning display, and overall feature set make it the better choice for me. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, especially for gaming and multimedia consumption. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ensures future-proofing for demanding applications, and the AMOLED display offers a significantly better visual experience. While the Moto G Stylus provides good value for its price, the Poco F5 Pro offers a more compelling overall package for my needs. The price difference is justified by the significant jump in performance and display quality.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.