Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Motorola Edge 50 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 August 29, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 105.57 cm³ 88.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 204 g 171 g
Height 162.8 mm 154.1 mm
Width 75.4 mm 71.2 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Nautical Blue
  • Latte
  • Grisaille
  • Poinciana

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 1256 x 2760
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 526 PPI 474 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 105.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.88 mAh/cm³ 48.5 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 4310 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 19

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5 ProMotorola Edge 50 NeoPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6154.1 x 71.2 x 8.1Poco F5 Pro is slightly taller and wider, Edge 50 Neo is thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)204171Edge 50 Neo is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDLTPO P-OLEDBoth offer excellent contrast and vibrant colors. LTPO allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment on the Edge 50 Neo, potentially saving battery.
Size (inches)6.676.4Poco F5 Pro offers a larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution1440 x 32001256 x 2760Poco F5 Pro has a sharper display (526 ppi vs 474 ppi). Noticeable in detail-oriented tasks like photo editing.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)14003000Edge 50 Neo boasts significantly higher peak brightness, ensuring excellent outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Dimensity 7300Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers superior processing power, beneficial for demanding games and multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz X2 & 3x2.5 GHz A710 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Poco F5 Pro's CPU architecture provides a performance advantage, particularly in single-core tasks.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G615 MC2Adreno 730 delivers better gaming performance and graphics rendering compared to the Mali-G615 MC2.
RAM (GB)8/128/12Both offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450While megapixels aren't everything, the Poco F5 Pro's larger sensor (1/2") potentially captures more light and detail compared to the Edge 50 Neo's 1/1.56" sensor.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 4K@30fpsPoco F5 Pro offers higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)51604310Poco F5 Pro has a larger battery, potentially lasting longer on a single charge.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 significantly outperforms the Dimensity 7300.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution for a more detailed visual experience.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • Higher Resolution Video Recording: Up to 8K.

Motorola Edge 50 Neo Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: Easier to handle and carry.
  • Brighter Display: Much better visibility in direct sunlight.
  • LTPO Display: More energy efficient due to dynamic refresh rate.
  • Newer Android Version: Ships with Android 14, offering potential software features and longer support.

Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Battery Efficiency: Poco F5 Pro prioritizes performance, while Edge 50 Neo balances performance with battery life.
  • Screen Size vs. Portability: Poco F5 Pro offers a larger, sharper display but sacrifices some portability.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: Ideal for power users, gamers, and those who prioritize performance and a large, sharp display. Excellent for demanding tasks, media consumption, and content creation.

Motorola Edge 50 Neo: Suitable for users seeking a balance of performance, battery life, and a bright, vibrant display. Great for everyday use, social media, web browsing, and moderate gaming. Those who prioritize outdoor visibility will appreciate the brighter display.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your primary use case? (Gaming, media consumption, productivity, etc.)
  2. How important is battery life versus performance?
  3. What is your budget? (Consider the price difference between storage variants.)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy Gamer: Poco F5 Pro for its superior performance.
  • Outdoor Enthusiast: Edge 50 Neo for its exceptionally bright display.
  • Budget-Conscious User: Consider storage variants and prices for both phones. The Edge 50 Neo may offer better value depending on specific needs.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

While the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has compelling features like its brighter display and lighter weight, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro's superior performance and sharper display are decisive factors for me. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, especially for demanding tasks and gaming. The larger battery is also a plus. I'm willing to compromise slightly on portability and outdoor visibility for the significant performance advantage the Poco F5 Pro offers. The newer Android version on the Edge 50 Neo is tempting, but the performance difference is more significant in my daily usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.