Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 September 14, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 105.57 cm³ 90.78 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.85 "/g
Weight 204 g 170 g
Height 162.8 mm 159.6 mm
Width 75.4 mm 72 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Soothing Sea
  • Caneel Bay

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.55 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 90.1 %
Pixel Density 526 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 116.54 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.88 mAh/cm³ 55.08 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G610 MC3

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5 ProMotorola Edge 40 NeoPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6159.6 x 72 x 7.9Poco F5 Pro is slightly larger and thicker. Edge 40 Neo is noticeably lighter. Edge 40 Neo might feel more comfortable for one-handed use due to smaller width.
Weight (g)204170Significant difference; Edge 40 Neo will be much easier to hold and carry for extended periods.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDP-OLEDBoth offer excellent contrast and vibrant colors. Subjective preference may apply regarding color accuracy and potential burn-in (though modern OLEDs minimize this).
Size (inches)6.676.55Poco F5 Pro offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution1440 x 3200 (WQHD+)1080 x 2400 (FHD+)Poco F5 Pro has a significantly sharper display, noticeable in text clarity and image detail.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120144Edge 40 Neo offers a higher refresh rate, resulting in smoother animations and scrolling, especially noticeable in gaming.
Peak Brightness (nits)14001300Both offer excellent brightness for outdoor visibility. The difference is minor in real-world usage.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Dimensity 7030Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance, translating to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming capabilities.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Superior core configuration on the Poco F5 Pro provides a noticeable performance advantage in demanding tasks.
RAM (GB)8/1212Both offer ample RAM for multitasking, but specific configurations should be compared.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450Poco F5 Pro has a higher resolution main sensor. Image quality depends on factors beyond resolution, but the Poco F5 pro has a larger sensor (1/2" vs 1/1.55"), potentially capturing more light.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 4K@30fpsPoco F5 Pro supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)51605000Marginal difference in battery capacity. Real-world battery life depends heavily on usage patterns and software optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Sharper Display: WQHD+ resolution offers superior clarity.
  • Higher Resolution Video Recording: Capable of recording 8K video.
  • Larger Main Camera Sensor: Potentially better low-light performance and depth of field.

Motorola Edge 40 Neo Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: Noticeably easier to handle and carry.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and animations.
  • Lower Price: Generally more affordable. (Based on provided limited price data)
  • Potentially Longer Software Support: Motorola has committed to longer OS updates for some devices, though this is not explicitly stated for the Edge 40 Neo.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: Ideal for power users, gamers, and those who prioritize performance and a sharp display. Excellent for demanding tasks, media consumption, and content creation.

Motorola Edge 40 Neo: Suitable for users who prioritize a lightweight, comfortable phone with a smooth display and good battery life for everyday tasks. A good option for budget-conscious buyers who don't require top-tier performance.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F5 Pro is generally more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? (Gaming, photography, general use)
  3. Do you prioritize performance or portability?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Poco F5 Pro for its superior performance.
  • Photographer/Videographer: Poco F5 Pro for its superior camera specs and 8K video recording.
  • Casual User on a Budget: Motorola Edge 40 Neo for its affordability and comfortable design.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

While the Motorola Edge 40 Neo offers a compelling combination of features for its price, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro. The significant performance difference offered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is crucial for my usage, which includes demanding tasks, occasional gaming, and a desire for future-proofing. The sharper display is also a significant factor for me, as I appreciate the increased clarity for media consumption and reading. While the Edge 40 Neo's lighter weight is appealing, the performance and display advantages of the Poco F5 Pro outweigh the portability benefit for my personal needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.