Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Honor 200 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Honor 200
Honor 200
Honor

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 May 31, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 105.57 cm³ 92.77 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.58 "/g
Weight 204 g 187 g
Height 162.8 mm 161.5 mm
Width 75.4 mm 74.6 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 7.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Black
  • Emerald Green
  • Moonlight White
  • Coral Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 1200 x 2664
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 90 %
Pixel Density 526 PPI 436 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 115.84 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.88 mAh/cm³ 56.05 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 720

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5 ProHonor 200Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6161.5 x 74.6 x 7.7Honor 200 is slightly smaller and thinner, potentially improving one-handed use.
Weight (g)204187Honor 200 is noticeably lighter, reducing fatigue during extended use.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDOLEDBoth offer excellent contrast and vibrant colors, but AMOLED generally consumes less power for dark content.
Size (inches)6.676.7Negligible size difference.
Resolution1440 x 32001200 x 2664Poco F5 Pro has a significantly sharper display (526 ppi vs 436 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)14004000Honor 200 boasts much higher peak brightness, ensuring better visibility in direct sunlight.
Color Depth68B1BHonor 200 supports a wider color gamut, potentially offering more nuanced color reproduction. However, the discernible difference in real-world usage might be minimal for most users.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Snapdragon 7 Gen 3Poco F5 Pro features a flagship-level processor, providing significantly better performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Poco F5 Pro's CPU architecture and higher clock speeds translate to faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and improved responsiveness.
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 720Poco F5 Pro's superior GPU ensures smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
RAM (GB)8/128/12/16Both offer ample RAM for multitasking. The 16GB option on the Honor 200 provides additional future-proofing.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450Megapixel count doesn't solely determine image quality. Sensor size and processing play a crucial role.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 4K@30fpsPoco F5 Pro offers higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)51605200Honor 200 has a slightly larger battery, but real-world battery life depends on various factors including software optimization and display usage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly higher performance: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Sharper display: The higher resolution display provides a noticeably crisper viewing experience.
  • Higher resolution video recording: Offers up to 8K recording.

Honor 200 Advantages:

  • Lighter and thinner design: Enhances portability and one-handed usability.
  • Brighter display: Ensures excellent outdoor visibility.
  • Wider color gamut: Potentially offers more nuanced color reproduction (although real-world difference may be subtle).
  • Slightly larger battery: Might translate to slightly longer battery life.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a sharp display, and high-resolution video recording. Suitable for gamers, power users, and content creators.

Honor 200: Suitable for users who value a lightweight and slim design, excellent outdoor visibility, and a long-lasting battery. Best for everyday users, social media enthusiasts, and those who consume media on their phones.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? Both phones fall in the medium price range, but specific configurations may vary.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming, content creation, or everyday tasks?
  3. Which features are most important to you? Performance, display quality, battery life, or design?

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

While the Honor 200 offers a compelling combination of design and display features, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro's significant performance advantage is the deciding factor for me. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a substantial boost in speed and responsiveness that would greatly enhance my daily usage, especially for multitasking and gaming. The sharper display is also a significant plus. While I appreciate the lighter weight and brighter display of the Honor 200, I prioritize the raw power and superior visual clarity offered by the Poco F5 Pro. The slightly smaller battery of the Poco F5 Pro is a minor trade-off I'm willing to make for the significant performance gains.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.