Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Google Pixel 9 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 August 22, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 105.57 cm³ 93.51 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.18 "/g
Weight 204 g 198 g
Height 162.8 mm 152.8 mm
Width 75.4 mm 72 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain
  • Wintergreen
  • Peony

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.3 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 1080 x 2424
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 86.5 %
Pixel Density 526 PPI 422 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1800 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 2700 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 118.42 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.88 mAh/cm³ 50.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G715 MC7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F5 ProGoogle Pixel 9Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6152.8 x 72.0 x 8.5Pixel 9 is noticeably smaller and might be more comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)204198Negligible weight difference in real-world usage.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.3Poco F5 Pro offers a larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution1440 x 32001080 x 2424Poco F5 Pro has a significantly sharper display (526 ppi vs 422 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
TypeAMOLEDOLEDBoth offer excellent contrast and vibrant colors.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both provide smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)14002700 (peak)Pixel 9 boasts much higher peak brightness, ensuring better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Google Tensor G4Both are high-performance chipsets, but benchmarks would be needed to compare real-world performance differences.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)Tensor G4 has a newer CPU architecture, potentially offering better efficiency and performance in certain tasks, particularly AI-related ones.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G715 MC7Adreno 730 generally offers stronger gaming performance.
RAM (GB)8/1212Pixel 9 offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and app switching.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450Poco F5 Pro has a higher resolution main sensor, but megapixels alone don't determine image quality. Pixel's computational photography prowess is well-regarded.
Ultrawide (MP)848Pixel 9's ultrawide offers significantly higher resolution.
Selfie Camera (MP)1610.5Poco F5 Pro has a higher resolution front-facing camera.
VideoUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 4K@60fpsPoco F5 Pro offers 8K video recording, although practical use cases for 8K are limited.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)51604700Poco F5 Pro has a larger battery, likely resulting in longer battery life.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare charging speeds without more information.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Advantages:

  • Sharper, Larger Display: Offers a more immersive and detailed viewing experience.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • 8K Video Recording: Offers higher resolution video recording, although practical benefits might be limited.
  • Lower Price (Generally): Historically, Poco phones offer competitive pricing.

Google Pixel 9 Advantages:

  • More Compact Design: Easier to handle and pocket.
  • Brighter Display: Superior outdoor visibility.
  • More RAM: Smoother multitasking.
  • Newer CPU Architecture & AI Focus: Potentially better performance and efficiency in certain tasks.
  • Stronger Computational Photography: Pixel phones are known for excellent image processing.
  • Longer Software Support: Google typically provides longer OS and security updates for Pixel phones.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: Users prioritizing media consumption, gaming, and long battery life on a budget.

Google Pixel 9: Users prioritizing a compact phone with a great camera, smooth performance, timely software updates, and excellent outdoor visibility.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? Historically, Poco phones are more affordable.
  2. What screen size do you prefer? Larger screen for media or smaller for one-handed use?
  3. What is most important: Camera quality, performance, battery life, or display quality?

My Choice: Google Pixel 9

While the Poco F5 Pro boasts impressive specifications for its price, the Google Pixel 9's compact form factor, brighter display for outdoor use, superior computational photography, longer software support, and newer, more efficient processor make it a more compelling overall package for my needs. I value a phone that is comfortable to hold, performs reliably in various conditions, and receives timely updates. While the Poco F5 Pro offers a larger battery and sharper display, these advantages are outweighed by the Pixel 9's strengths in areas that matter more to me. The potential performance advantage of the Tensor G4, especially in AI and machine learning tasks, further solidifies my choice.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.