Xiaomi Poco F4 vs TCL 50 SE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
TCL 50 SE
TCL 50 SE
Tcl

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 April 8, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.5 cm³ 102.86 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 195 g 195 g
Height 163.2 mm 168.2 mm
Width 76 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green
  • Space Gray
  • Midnight Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 86 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 550 nits
HBM Brightness 900 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.15 mAh/in² 108.99 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 48.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5010 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Mediatek Helio G88 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco F4 vs. TCL 50 SE: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Poco F4 and the TCL 50 SE, dissecting their specs and uncovering what they truly offer in real-world usage.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4TCL 50 SEReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.2 x 76 x 7.7168.2 x 75.5 x 8.1Poco F4 is slightly more compact and pocketable.
Weight (g)195195Both phones have a similar weight, feeling substantial in hand.
Display
TypeAMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzPoco F4 offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and smoother scrolling. TCL 50 SE has a larger screen size.
Size6.67"6.78"TCL 50 SE provides a slightly larger viewing area for media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2460Both offer sharp visuals, but the TCL 50 SE might be slightly less sharp due to lower ppi given the larger screen size.
Brightness1300 nits (peak)550 nits (typ)Poco F4 is significantly brighter, ensuring better outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 5G (7nm)Helio G88 (12nm)Poco F4 delivers significantly faster performance, smoother multitasking, and better gaming capabilities.
CPUOcta-core (up to 3.2 GHz)Octa-core (up to 2.0 GHz)Poco F4 offers superior processing power for demanding tasks.
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G52 MC2Poco F4 boasts a much more powerful GPU, ideal for gaming and graphically intensive applications.
RAM6/8 GB4/6 GBPoco F4 offers more RAM options for smoother multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, OIS50MPPoco F4's main camera offers higher resolution and optical image stabilization for sharper photos and videos.
Video Recording4K@60fps1080p@30fpsPoco F4 allows for higher resolution and frame rate video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity4500 mAh5010 mAhTCL 50 SE has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life.
Charging67W Fast Charging33W Fast ChargingPoco F4 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Insights

The Poco F4 is a clear performance champion, powered by the Snapdragon 870 and boasting a vibrant 120Hz AMOLED display. This translates to a fluid, responsive user experience, especially for gaming and demanding tasks. Its camera system, with OIS, also promises superior image quality.

The TCL 50 SE, while less powerful, prioritizes battery life with its massive 5010 mAh capacity and a larger display for media consumption. It's a more budget-conscious option for users who prioritize basic functionality and long-lasting battery over raw performance.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Poco F4: Ideal for gamers, power users, and anyone who values a smooth, responsive experience and a high-quality display. The faster charging is a huge bonus for busy lifestyles.

TCL 50 SE: Best suited for budget-conscious users, casual users who prioritize battery life, and those who consume a lot of media on their phones. The larger screen enhances this experience.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The TCL 50 SE is generally more affordable.
  • What are your primary use cases? Gaming and demanding tasks favor the Poco F4, while media consumption and long battery life point towards the TCL 50 SE.
  • Do you value performance or battery life more? The Poco F4 excels in performance, while the TCL 50 SE boasts superior battery capacity.

My Choice: The Poco F4

While the TCL 50 SE offers a compelling battery life and larger display, I would choose the Poco F4. The significantly superior performance, smoother 120Hz AMOLED display, faster charging, and better camera system are decisive factors for me. I prioritize a fluid and responsive user experience, and the Poco F4 delivers that in spades. The Snapdragon 870 is still a highly capable processor, making the phone feel snappy even with multiple apps open. The brighter, more vibrant AMOLED display enhances everything from browsing photos to watching videos. While battery life is important, the Poco F4's fast charging mitigates this concern for me, allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day. In short, the Poco F4 offers a more well-rounded and future-proof package for my needs.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.