Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.5 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 195 g 222 g
Height 163.2 mm 162.3 mm
Width 76 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.15 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Xiaomi Poco F4 and the Samsung Galaxy M35, dissecting their technical specifications and translating them into real-world implications for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4Samsung Galaxy M35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.2 x 76 x 7.7162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1Poco F4 is slightly thinner and lighter, potentially more comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)195222Noticeable difference in weight; M35 might feel more substantial but less pocketable.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.6Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness; both offer crisp visuals.
TypeAMOLED, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzBoth offer vibrant colors and smooth scrolling thanks to the 120Hz refresh rate. Poco F4 boasts higher peak brightness and Dolby Vision support for enhanced HDR content.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 5GExynos 1380 5G870 is a proven performer, but the newer 1380 likely offers better power efficiency and potentially improved graphics performance. Real-world usage needs benchmarking.
CPUOcta-core (Kryo 585)Octa-core (Cortex-A78/A55)Both offer capable multi-tasking, but architectural differences require real-world testing for comparison.
RAM (GB)6/8/126/8More RAM options on Poco F4, potentially beneficial for heavy multitaskers.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450Poco F4's higher resolution could offer slightly more detail. Sensor and processing will play a larger role in overall image quality, however.
Video4K@60fps4K@30fps with EISPoco F4 offers higher resolution and frame rate video recording; M35 boasts Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) at 4K for smoother footage.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)45006000Significant advantage for M35 in potential battery life.
Charging67W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingMuch faster charging on the Poco F4; you'll spend less time tethered to a wall outlet.

2. Key Insights

The Poco F4 excels in performance with its powerful Snapdragon 870, faster charging, and brighter display with Dolby Vision. It offers a slightly more premium feel due to its slimmer profile.

The Galaxy M35 shines with its massive 6000mAh battery for extended usage and a newer Exynos processor that might offer better power efficiency. It features a comparable display and 5G connectivity. While its 4K video recording is limited to 30fps, it features Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for potentially smoother footage.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Poco F4: Suited for users who prioritize performance, a vibrant display with HDR support, fast charging, and a sleek design. Ideal for gamers, media consumers, and those who need a phone that can keep up with demanding tasks.

Galaxy M35: Best for users who value long battery life above all else. Great for those who are frequently away from power outlets or use their phones heavily throughout the day. It's a solid choice for general use, social media, and light gaming. The inclusion of EIS at 4K makes it attractive for video recording on the go.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your biggest priority: Battery life or Performance? If battery life is paramount, the M35 is the clear winner. If you need raw processing power and a faster display, the Poco F4 is the better choice.
  2. How important is fast charging? If you need to top up your battery quickly, the Poco F4's 67W charging will be significantly faster than the M35's 25W.
  3. What is your budget? While both are mid-range devices, actual pricing will vary. Consider the price-to-performance ratio in your region.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F4

While the Galaxy M35's battery life is tempting, I would personally choose the Xiaomi Poco F4. My usage heavily involves media consumption, multitasking, and occasional gaming, all areas where the Poco F4 excels. The Snapdragon 870 is a proven performer, and the brighter, Dolby Vision-supported display elevates the viewing experience significantly. The significantly faster charging is also a major draw for me, as it minimizes downtime. While the M35 boasts a newer Exynos chip, real-world performance comparisons are needed to definitively crown a victor in that arena. Until then, the proven track record of the Snapdragon 870, combined with the other advantages of the Poco F4, make it the more compelling device for my needs. The slimmer form factor is the cherry on top.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.