Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Oppo Reno12 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 June 18, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.5 cm³ 89.39 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 195 g 180 g
Height 163.2 mm 161.5 mm
Width 76 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green
  • Space Brown
  • Sunset Gold
  • Nebula Silver
  • Manish Malhotra

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 89.4 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.15 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 55.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13 17

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Xiaomi Poco F4 and the Oppo Reno12 Pro, dissecting their technical specifications and translating them into real-world implications for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4Oppo Reno12 ProReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.2 x 76 x 7.7161.5 x 74.8 x 7.4Reno12 Pro is slightly more compact and lighter.
Weight (g)195180Noticeable difference in hand feel; Reno12 Pro will feel less bulky.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.7Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2412Virtually identical sharpness.
TypeAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Smooth scrolling and responsive gaming on both.
Peak Brightness1300 nits1200 nitsPoco F4 might be slightly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870Dimensity 7300870 is a proven performer, but 7300 is newer with potential for better power efficiency.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreBoth should handle multitasking well, but benchmark tests would reveal real-world speed differences.
RAM (GB)6/8/1212/16Reno12 Pro offers more RAM in its configurations, beneficial for heavy multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450Megapixels aren't everything; image quality depends on sensor and processing.
Ultrawide (MP)88Similar ultrawide capabilities expected.
Telephoto (MP)N/A50Reno12 Pro boasts a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom.
Selfie (MP)2050Reno12 Pro has a significantly higher resolution selfie camera.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)45005000Reno12 Pro offers a larger battery, potentially translating to longer usage time.
Fast Charging (W)6780Reno12 Pro charges significantly faster.

2. Key Insights

The Poco F4 shines with its powerful Snapdragon 870, delivering excellent performance for gaming and demanding tasks. Its brighter display might be preferable for outdoor use.

The Reno12 Pro counters with a newer Dimensity 7300 chip, potentially offering better power efficiency, a larger battery, and faster charging. Its standout feature is the triple camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens, catering to photography enthusiasts. The higher RAM options on the Reno12 Pro will also provide a smoother experience for power users.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Poco F4: Suited for users prioritizing performance and value. Gamers, power users on a budget, and those seeking a bright display will appreciate the F4.

Reno12 Pro: Ideal for photography enthusiasts, thanks to its versatile camera system. Users who value battery life, fast charging, and ample RAM for multitasking will also find the Reno12 Pro compelling.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The Poco F4 generally comes at a lower price point.
  • Is camera quality a top priority? If so, the Reno12 Pro's telephoto lens and superior selfie camera are strong advantages.
  • How important is battery life and charging speed? The Reno12 Pro excels in this area.

My Choice: Oppo Reno12 Pro

While the Poco F4 offers incredible value for its performance, I would choose the Oppo Reno12 Pro. The combination of a larger battery, faster charging, a more versatile camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens, and the increased RAM in the configurations are compelling reasons. As a tech journalist, having a great camera for capturing events and a long-lasting battery for extended use are crucial. The slightly higher price of the Reno12 Pro is justified by these advantages for my specific needs. Furthermore, the newer Dimensity 7300, while potentially less powerful in raw performance than the Snapdragon 870, intrigues me with its potential for improved power efficiency, which translates to better battery life in real-world usage. The under-display fingerprint sensor is also a preference of mine.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.