Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Oppo Reno12 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.5 cm³ 90.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.79 "/g
Weight 195 g 177 g
Height 163.2 mm 161.4 mm
Width 76 mm 74.1 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green
  • Matte Brown
  • Sunset Pink
  • Astro Silver

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 90.3 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.15 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 55.01 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13 17

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco F4 vs. Oppo Reno12: A Deep Dive for the Discerning Smartphone User

Hello fellow tech enthusiasts! Alex Griffin here, ready to dissect the Xiaomi Poco F4 and the Oppo Reno12. We'll go beyond the spec sheets to uncover what these phones really offer in terms of daily performance and user experience. Let's dive in!

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4Oppo Reno12Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.2 x 76 x 7.7161.4 x 74.1 x 7.6Reno12 is slightly smaller and lighter.
Weight (g)195177Noticeable difference in hand; Reno12 feels more premium.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.7Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2412Virtually identical sharpness.
Panel TypeAMOLED, 120HzAMOLED, 120HzBoth offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and smooth scrolling.
Peak Brightness (nits)13001400Reno12 might be slightly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 5GDimensity 7300870 offers proven performance, 7300 is newer but real-world performance needs testing.
CPUOcta-core (Kryo 585)Octa-core (Cortex-A78/A55)Both should handle daily tasks with ease, gaming performance might differ.
RAM6/8GB12GBReno12's larger RAM enables smoother multitasking and app switching.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.7950MP, f/1.8Poco F4 has higher resolution; image quality depends on sensor and processing.
Ultrawide8MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2Comparable ultrawide capabilities.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.432MP, f/2.0Reno12 boasts a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video4K@60fps4K@30fpsPoco F4 offers higher resolution video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)45005000Reno12 likely offers longer battery life.
Fast Charging67W80WReno12 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: While the Reno12 boasts a newer chipset and significantly more RAM, the Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F4 is a proven performer. Real-world usage and benchmarks will determine the actual difference.
  • Camera: This is a close call. The Poco F4 has a higher resolution main sensor and can record 4K@60fps video, while the Reno12 offers a higher-resolution selfie camera and potentially better low-light performance due to its newer sensor technology (needs verification).
  • Battery: The Reno12 has a clear advantage in battery capacity and charging speed.
  • Software: The Reno12 ships with a newer version of Android, promising longer software support.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco F4: For budget-conscious users prioritizing proven performance, fast refresh rate display, and good overall value. Ideal for gamers and multimedia consumers.
  • Reno12: For users who value longer battery life, faster charging, a sleek design, and the latest software. Suitable for power users, social media enthusiasts, and those who demand long-lasting performance.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F4 is likely to be more affordable.
  2. What are your performance priorities? Determine if you need the absolute latest chipset or if a proven performer suffices.
  3. How important is battery life and charging speed? If these are crucial, the Reno12 has a significant edge.

My Choice: The Oppo Reno12

While the Poco F4 offers excellent value, I would choose the Oppo Reno12. The combination of a larger battery, faster charging, sleeker design, newer Android version (with longer update support), and potentially improved camera technology (pending real-world reviews) makes it a more compelling overall package for my needs. I prioritize longevity and having the latest software, and the Reno12's larger RAM will ensure smoother multitasking in the long run. Although the Dimensity 7300 is newer and needs real world testing, I am willing to bet on the advancements in its architecture. While I acknowledge the Poco F4's strengths, particularly in video recording, the Reno12 aligns better with my personal preferences and usage patterns.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.