Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Oppo Reno11 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 January 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.5 cm³ 95.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.68 "/g
Weight 195 g 182 g
Height 163.2 mm 162.4 mm
Width 76 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green
  • Wave Green
  • Rock Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 89.5 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits 800 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.15 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 52.45 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco F4 vs. Oppo Reno11: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive deep into the specs of the Xiaomi Poco F4 and the Oppo Reno11 to see which phone comes out on top. We'll break down the technical jargon into plain English and see what it all means for you, the user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4Oppo Reno11Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.2 x 76 x 7.7162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9Poco F4 is slightly taller and narrower. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)195182Reno11 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.7Virtually identical screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2412Similar sharpness; both offer crisp visuals.
TypeAMOLED, 120HzAMOLED, 120HzBoth offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and smooth scrolling thanks to the 120Hz refresh rate.
Peak Brightness (nits)1300950 (typical), 1400 (peak)Poco F4 might offer slightly better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 5GDimensity 7050Snapdragon 870 generally offers superior performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (Kryo 585)Octa-core (Cortex-A78 & A55)Poco F4 likely to have a performance edge in multitasking and heavy applications.
RAM6/8/12GB8/12GBBoth offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking; 12GB option provides future-proofing.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.7950MP, f/1.88Image quality depends on sensor and processing; megapixels aren't everything. Real-world testing needed.
Ultrawide8MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2Comparable ultrawide capabilities.
Macro2MP, f/2.4NonePoco F4 offers a dedicated macro lens, though its low resolution might limit detail.
TelephotoNone32MP, f/2.0Reno11 offers a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, a significant advantage for capturing distant subjects.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)45004800(spec sheet says 5000)Reno11's larger battery likely translates to longer usage time.
Fast Charging67W67WEqually fast charging speeds; minimal downtime for topping up the battery.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Poco F4, with its Snapdragon 870, holds a significant advantage in raw processing power compared to the Reno11's Dimensity 7050. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading, and better overall responsiveness.

  • Camera System: While both phones offer capable camera systems, they cater to different needs. The Reno11 shines with its dedicated telephoto lens, enabling optical zoom for capturing distant subjects. The Poco F4 counters with a dedicated macro lens, although its usefulness is debatable given the low resolution. The Reno11 also features a higher resolution selfie camera.

  • Battery & Charging: The Reno11 boasts a larger battery, promising longer usage on a single charge. However, both phones offer equally fast 67W charging, minimizing downtime.

  • Software: The Reno11 ships with the latest Android 14, offering potential advantages in features and long-term software updates compared to the Poco F4's Android 12 (upgradable to 13).

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco F4: Ideal for power users, gamers, and those prioritizing raw performance and speed. Its more affordable price point also makes it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers who don't want to compromise on processing power.

  • Reno11: Suited for photography enthusiasts who value optical zoom and a higher-resolution selfie camera. The larger battery and newer Android version also appeal to users who prioritize longevity and up-to-date features. Also good for users who want an under-display fingerprint scanner.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What are your primary smartphone needs? (Gaming, photography, general use)
  • What is your budget? (The Poco F4 is generally more affordable.)
  • How important is software longevity and the latest features? (The Reno11 ships with newer software.)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer on a Budget: Poco F4
  • Photography Enthusiast: Reno11
  • General User Seeking Long Battery Life: Reno11

My Choice: The Oppo Reno11

While the Poco F4 offers tempting performance, I would choose the Oppo Reno11. The deciding factors for me are the telephoto lens, the larger battery, and the more up-to-date Android version. I prioritize camera versatility and battery life in my daily usage, and the Reno11 delivers in those areas. While the Snapdragon 870 is a powerful chip, the Dimensity 7050 is more than sufficient for my needs. The newer Android OS ensures longer software support and access to the latest features. Although I appreciate the lighter weight of the Reno11, the under-display fingerprint reader is more appealing to me than the side-mounted fingerprint reader on the F4.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.