Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Nothing Phone (2) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 July 17, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 95.5 cm³ 106.51 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 195 g 201.2 g
Height 163.2 mm 162.1 mm
Width 76 mm 76.4 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green
  • White
  • Dark Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 87.2 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits 1600 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.15 mAh/in² 104.70 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 44.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13 16

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco F4 vs. Nothing Phone (2): A Deep Dive

Let's cut through the marketing hype and dissect the Xiaomi Poco F4 and the Nothing Phone (2), focusing on what truly matters: how these devices perform in the real world.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4Nothing Phone (2)Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.2 x 76 x 7.7162.1 x 76.4 x 8.6Poco F4 is slightly thinner and lighter.
Weight (g)195201.2Negligible difference in hand feel for most users.
Display
TypeAMOLEDLTPO OLEDNothing Phone (2)'s LTPO display allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery. Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Size (inches)6.676.7Virtually identical screen real estate.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and responsive gaming.
Peak Brightness (nits)13001600Nothing Phone (2) will be more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 5GSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Nothing Phone (2) boasts significantly improved CPU and GPU performance, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming capabilities.
RAM (base)6GB8GBMore RAM on the Nothing Phone (2) enables better multitasking and reduces app closures in the background.
OSAndroid 12Android 13Nothing Phone (2) ships with a newer Android version and is promised longer software updates.
Camera
Main Sensor (MP)6450Megapixels aren't everything. Image quality will depend on sensor size, aperture, and processing. Both utilize reputable sensors (OmniVision vs Sony IMX890), practical testing is needed to determine a clear winner.
Ultrawide (MP)850Nothing Phone (2)'s significantly higher resolution ultrawide offers more detail and versatility.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)45004700Slightly larger battery in the Nothing Phone (2), but real-world battery life depends on optimization and usage patterns.
Charging (W)67W45W wired, 15W wirelessPoco F4 charges significantly faster with wired charging. Nothing Phone (2) offers the convenience of wireless charging.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Nothing Phone (2) is a clear winner, offering a substantial performance leap over the Poco F4's Snapdragon 870. This translates to a noticeably smoother and more responsive user experience, particularly for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.

  • Display: While both phones offer excellent displays, the Nothing Phone (2)'s LTPO panel provides superior power efficiency and higher peak brightness. The adaptive refresh rate can significantly extend battery life.

  • Camera: The megapixel count difference in the main camera shouldn't be overstated. However, the Nothing Phone (2)'s inclusion of a high-resolution ultrawide sensor is a significant advantage for landscape and group photography.

  • Software and Updates: The Nothing Phone (2) ships with the latest Android version and a commitment to longer software updates, ensuring a more future-proof device.

  • Charging: The Poco F4's significantly faster wired charging speed is a boon for those who need a quick top-up. However, the Nothing Phone (2)'s wireless charging capability adds convenience for others.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Xiaomi Poco F4: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize fast charging and solid performance for everyday tasks. It's a great option for social media, web browsing, and casual gaming.

  • Nothing Phone (2): Ideal for users who demand top-tier performance, a longer software update cycle, the latest features like wireless charging, and a more versatile camera system. Gamers, power users, and content creators will appreciate its capabilities.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What's your budget? The Poco F4 is significantly more affordable.
  • Are performance and future-proofing paramount? The Nothing Phone (2) is the clear winner here.
  • Do you prioritize fast wired charging or the convenience of wireless charging? This will help you decide between the two.

My Choice: The Nothing Phone (2)

While the Poco F4 offers excellent value, I would choose the Nothing Phone (2). The superior performance of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, coupled with the LTPO display's battery efficiency and higher peak brightness, makes a compelling case. The more versatile camera system, newer Android version with longer update support, and unique design further solidify its position as the more desirable device for my needs. The added cost is justified by the significant improvements in key areas that directly impact the overall user experience. As a tech enthusiast, I value future-proofing and cutting-edge performance, and the Nothing Phone (2) delivers on both fronts. While I appreciate the Poco F4's faster wired charging, I find the convenience and versatility of wireless charging more appealing in the long run.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.