Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Nokia C32 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C32
Nokia C32
Nokia

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 February 25, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 95.5 cm³ 107.44 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.26 "/g
Weight 195 g 199.4 g
Height 163.2 mm 164.6 mm
Width 76 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green
  • Charcoal
  • Autumn Green
  • Beach Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 81.6 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.15 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 46.54 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 IMG8322

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco F4 vs. Nokia C32: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Poco F4 and the Nokia C32, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer in real-world usage.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4Nokia C32Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.2 x 76 x 7.7164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6Poco F4 is slightly more compact.
Weight (g)195199.4Negligible difference in weight.
Display
TypeAMOLED, 120HzIPS LCDPoco F4 offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling.
Size6.67"6.5"Poco F4 provides a slightly larger screen.
Resolution1080 x 2400 (395 ppi)720 x 1600 (270 ppi)Poco F4 boasts significantly sharper visuals.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 5GUnisoc SC9863A1Poco F4 delivers vastly superior processing power for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.2 GHz & 3x2.42 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz)Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz & 4x1.2 GHz)Poco F4 offers much faster and more responsive performance.
RAM6GB/8GB3GB/4GBPoco F4 handles multitasking with greater ease.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.79, OIS50MPPoco F4 likely produces better image quality due to OIS and potentially a superior sensor.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.48MPPoco F4 offers a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video4K@60fps1080p@30fpsPoco F4 allows for higher resolution and smoother video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity4500 mAh5000 mAhNokia C32 has a larger battery capacity, but real-world battery life depends on other factors.
Charging67W Fast Charging10WPoco F4 charges significantly faster.
Other
NFCYesNoPoco F4 supports contactless payments and data transfer.
Price RangeMediumLowNokia C32 is significantly more affordable.

2. Key Insights

The Poco F4 is a clear performance champion, powered by the Snapdragon 870, a flagship-level chipset from the previous generation. This translates to blazing-fast speeds, smooth multitasking, and excellent gaming capabilities. The AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate further enhances the user experience with vibrant colors and fluid scrolling.

The Nokia C32, on the other hand, focuses on affordability. While its Unisoc processor and lower RAM configuration limit performance, it offers a large 5000mAh battery for extended usage. The camera specifications, though seemingly competitive on paper (50MP main camera), lack details on sensor quality and features, making a direct comparison challenging.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Poco F4: Ideal for power users, gamers, and those who prioritize performance, a premium display, and fast charging. It's a device built for demanding tasks and multimedia consumption.

Nokia C32: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and basic smartphone functionality. It's a good option for those who primarily use their phones for calling, texting, and light browsing.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? If price is a major constraint, the Nokia C32 is the more accessible option.
  • What are your primary smartphone needs? For demanding tasks and entertainment, the Poco F4 excels. For basic communication and long battery life, the C32 is sufficient.
  • Do you value performance and a premium display? The Poco F4 offers a significantly better experience in these areas.

My Choice: The Xiaomi Poco F4

If I were choosing between these two, I'd go with the Poco F4. While the Nokia C32 offers excellent value for its price, I prioritize performance, a fluid display, and fast charging. The Poco F4's Snapdragon 870, coupled with the 120Hz AMOLED screen, provides a vastly superior user experience that aligns with my needs as a tech enthusiast and heavy smartphone user. The added benefit of NFC for contactless payments further solidifies my choice. The price difference is justifiable for the substantial performance and feature upgrades. The Nokia C32 is a commendable budget option, but the Poco F4 offers a level of performance and refinement that I find essential in a daily driver.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.