Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 95.5 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 195 g 184.5 g
Height 163.2 mm 170.8 mm
Width 76 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.15 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13 16

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco F4 vs. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: A Deep Dive

The smartphone market offers a dizzying array of choices, and deciding between two seemingly similar devices can be challenging. Today, we'll dissect the Xiaomi Poco F4 and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, two compelling options with distinct strengths. Let's cut through the marketing jargon and uncover what truly matters to users.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4Motorola Razr 40 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm170.8 x 74 x 7 mm (folded)Razr 40 Ultra significantly more compact when folded, pocketable
Weight195g184.5gRazr 40 Ultra slightly lighter
FoldableNoYesRazr 40 Ultra offers unique form factor, larger external display
Display
Size6.67"6.9"Razr 40 Ultra slightly larger main display
TypeAMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDRazr 40 Ultra's foldable screen introduces durability concerns
Refresh Rate120Hz165HzRazr 40 Ultra smoother scrolling, animations
External DisplayN/A3.4" pOLEDRazr 40 Ultra allows for substantial interaction while closed
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Razr 40 Ultra significantly faster CPU and GPU
RAM6/8GB8/12GBRazr 40 Ultra offers better multitasking, future-proofing
OSAndroid 12Android 13Razr 40 Ultra comes with newer OS, longer update support
Camera
Main Camera64MP12MPPoco F4 higher resolution, Razr 40 Ultra focuses on quality
Selfie Camera20MP32MPRazr 40 Ultra higher resolution selfie camera
Battery Life
Capacity4500mAh3800mAhPoco F4 larger battery capacity
Charging67W Fast30W Fast, 8W WirelessPoco F4 faster wired charging, Razr 40 Ultra offers wireless

2. Key Insights

The Poco F4 excels in raw performance for its price point. The Snapdragon 870, coupled with a 120Hz AMOLED display, delivers a fluid and responsive experience for gaming and everyday tasks. Its larger battery also promises longer usage between charges. However, its design is conventional, and the camera system, while boasting high megapixel counts, might not deliver the image quality of flagship competitors.

The Razr 40 Ultra, on the other hand, is a statement piece. Its foldable design and large external display redefine how we interact with our smartphones. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides flagship-level power, and the internal display is stunning. However, the foldable screen introduces potential durability concerns, and the battery life is expected to be shorter due to the power demands of the external display and folding mechanism. The lower resolution main camera prioritizes image quality over sheer megapixels.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

The Poco F4 is ideal for budget-conscious power users who prioritize performance, battery life, and a large screen. Gamers, content consumers, and multitaskers will appreciate its capabilities.

The Razr 40 Ultra is perfect for trendsetters and early adopters who value cutting-edge design and portability. The large external display significantly enhances usability on the go, making it perfect for quick interactions and notifications without unfolding.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • Is a foldable design a priority? If yes, the Razr 40 Ultra is the clear choice.
  • What's your budget? The Poco F4 offers exceptional value for its price.
  • Which matters more: raw performance or innovative features? The Poco F4 leans towards performance, while the Razr 40 Ultra offers unique functionality.

My Choice: The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

While the Poco F4 offers tremendous value, I'd choose the Razr 40 Ultra. The foldable form factor, coupled with the expansive external display, genuinely changes the smartphone experience. The ability to quickly triage notifications, reply to messages, and even use apps without unfolding the phone is incredibly appealing. I'm willing to accept the trade-offs of potentially slightly shorter battery life (mitigated by wireless charging) and a slightly lower resolution main camera in exchange for this innovative design and user experience. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ensures that performance won't be a bottleneck, and the newer Android version promises longer software support. For me, the Razr 40 Ultra represents a meaningful leap forward in mobile technology.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.