Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Motorola Moto G85 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.5 cm³ 89.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.9 "/g
Weight 195 g 171 g
Height 163.2 mm 161.9 mm
Width 76 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Olive Green
  • Urban Grey
  • Magenta

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.15 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 55.59 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Xiaomi Poco F4 and the Motorola Moto G85, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4Motorola Moto G85Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.2 x 76 x 7.7161.9 x 73.1 x 7.6Poco F4 slightly taller and wider. Moto G85 marginally thinner. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)195171Moto G85 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
TypeAMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby VisionpOLED, 120Hz, 1B colorsBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. AMOLED on Poco F4 might offer deeper blacks and higher peak brightness.
Size (inches)6.676.67Identical screen sizes provide ample viewing space for both devices.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2400Same resolution results in comparable sharpness.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 5G (7nm)Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6nm)Poco F4 significantly more powerful, enabling smoother multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.2 GHz & 3x2.42 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz)Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz & 6x2.0 GHz)Poco F4 boasts higher clock speeds, translating to faster processing.
RAM (GB)6/8/128/12Both offer ample RAM for smooth operation, but higher RAM options on both can future-proof the device.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)64 MP, OIS50 MP, OISPoco F4's higher resolution could offer slightly more detail in photos. OIS benefits both in low-light.
Selfie Camera(MP)20 MP32 MPMoto G85 has higher resolution front camera for potentially sharper selfies.
Video4K@60fps1080p@60fpsPoco F4 capable of higher resolution video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)45005000Moto G85 has a larger battery, potentially offering longer usage time.
Charging67W Fast Charging30W Fast ChargingPoco F4 charges significantly faster, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance Powerhouse: The Poco F4, with its Snapdragon 870, dramatically outperforms the Moto G85 in processing power. This translates to a noticeably smoother experience in demanding tasks and gaming.

  • Display Nuances: While both phones boast 120Hz refresh rates, the Poco F4's AMOLED screen might deliver slightly better contrast and higher peak brightness compared to the Moto G85's pOLED.

  • Camera Considerations: The Poco F4 boasts 4K video recording, offering superior video quality. While the Moto G85 has a higher resolution selfie camera, the Poco F4's overall camera system with OIS might provide better versatility.

  • Battery and Charging Trade-off: The Moto G85 boasts a larger battery capacity, potentially lasting longer on a single charge. However, the Poco F4 compensates with significantly faster 67W charging, quickly replenishing the battery.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco F4: Ideal for power users, gamers, and those who prioritize performance and a fast charging experience. Its superior processing power and vibrant AMOLED display cater to demanding tasks and multimedia consumption.

  • Moto G85: Suitable for users seeking a balance between battery life, a decent display, and everyday usability. Its lighter weight and larger battery make it a comfortable option for extended use, while the capable camera system caters to casual photography.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your primary use case? Heavy gaming and multitasking? The Poco F4 is your clear winner. Casual browsing, social media, and long battery life? The Moto G85 fits the bill.

  2. What is your budget? Both phones fall in the mid-range category, but slight price variations might exist depending on storage configurations and regional availability.

  3. Which features matter most? Prioritize performance and fast charging above all else? Choose the Poco F4. Lean towards longer battery life, a lighter phone, and a high-resolution selfie camera? Opt for the Moto G85.

My Choice: I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F4. While the Moto G85 offers a compelling combination of battery life and a decent display, I prioritize raw performance and a fluid user experience. The Snapdragon 870, coupled with faster charging, aligns perfectly with my usage pattern, which involves multitasking, content creation, and occasional gaming. The slight trade-off in battery capacity is acceptable considering the significant performance advantage and quick charging capabilities of the Poco F4. I appreciate the responsiveness and speed a powerful chipset provides, and the Poco F4 delivers that in spades.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.