Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 April 8, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.5 cm³ 95.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.6 "/g
Weight 195 g 186 g
Height 163.2 mm 161.2 mm
Width 76 mm 72.4 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Luxe Lavender
  • Black Beauty
  • Moonlight Pearl

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 92.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.15 mAh/in² 100.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 720

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A 1.4
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13 17

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco F4 vs. Motorola Edge 50 Pro: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Xiaomi Poco F4 and the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, two compelling mid-range contenders vying for your attention. We'll go beyond the spec sheet, translating raw numbers into real-world experiences to help you decide which phone fits your lifestyle.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4Motorola Edge 50 ProReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.2 x 76 x 7.7161.2 x 72.4 x 8.2Poco F4 is slightly taller and wider; Edge 50 Pro is a tad thicker. Negligible difference in hand.
Weight (g)195186Edge 50 Pro is marginally lighter.
Display
TypeAMOLED, 120Hzp-OLED, 144HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors; Edge 50 Pro's higher refresh rate is smoother.
Resolution1080 x 24001220 x 2712Edge 50 Pro has a sharper display.
Peak Brightness (nits)13002000Edge 50 Pro is significantly brighter outdoors.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 5G (7nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm)Edge 50 Pro boasts a newer, more power-efficient chip, but 870 still delivers flagship-level speed.
CPUOcta-core (up to 3.2 GHz)Octa-core (up to 2.63 GHz)Poco F4 might have a slight edge in raw CPU performance.
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 720Edge 50 Pro's GPU could offer better gaming performance.
RAM6/8 GB12 GBEdge 50 Pro offers more RAM for multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.7950MP, f/1.4Edge 50 Pro's wider aperture might capture better low-light photos.
Ultrawide8MP, f/2.213MP, f/2.2Edge 50 Pro has a higher resolution ultrawide.
TelephotoN/A10MP, f/2.0, 3x optical zoomEdge 50 Pro offers optical zoom for better close-ups.
Battery Life
Capacity4500 mAh4500 mAhSimilar battery capacities. Real-world usage will depend on optimization.
Fast Charging67W125WEdge 50 Pro charges significantly faster.
SoftwareAndroid 12, upgradable to 13Android 14, upgradable to 17Edge 50 Pro ships with a newer Android version and longer software support commitment.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: While the Poco F4's Snapdragon 870 is no slouch, the Edge 50 Pro's newer Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, combined with more RAM, might offer better sustained performance and efficiency in the long run, especially for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Display: The Edge 50 Pro shines with its brighter, sharper p-OLED display and a higher 144Hz refresh rate, delivering a more immersive visual experience.
  • Camera: The Edge 50 Pro's camera system is more versatile with its inclusion of a telephoto lens for optical zoom and a higher-resolution ultrawide sensor. The wider aperture on the main lens could also provide an advantage in low light.
  • Software & Longevity: The Edge 50 Pro's newer Android version and commitment to future updates offer a longer software lifespan and access to the latest features.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco F4: For budget-conscious users prioritizing raw performance and a vibrant AMOLED display for everyday tasks, multimedia consumption, and casual gaming.
  • Edge 50 Pro: Ideal for users who demand a top-tier display, faster charging, a more versatile camera system with optical zoom, and the latest software with extended support. Gamers might also prefer the Edge 50 Pro for its Adreno 720 GPU.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your budget? The Poco F4 generally offers better value in terms of pure price-to-performance.
  2. Are camera versatility and future-proofing important? If so, the Edge 50 Pro is the clear winner.
  3. How much do you value display quality and charging speed? The Edge 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco F4 in these areas.

My Choice: The Motorola Edge 50 Pro

While the Poco F4 is a solid device, I would choose the Motorola Edge 50 Pro. The combination of a stunning p-OLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate, the more powerful and efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chip, versatile camera system with a telephoto lens, blazing-fast 125W charging, and the promise of longer software updates makes it a more compelling package for my needs. I prioritize a fluid user experience, excellent visuals, and having the latest features, and the Edge 50 Pro delivers on all fronts. The slightly higher price is justified by the significant upgrades in key areas.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.