Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Motorola Edge 40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Edge 40
Motorola Edge 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 May 4, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 95.5 cm³ 86.68 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.92 "/g
Weight 195 g 167 g
Height 163.2 mm 158.4 mm
Width 76 mm 72 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green
  • Eclipse Black
  • Nebula Green
  • Viva Magenta
  • Lunar Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.55 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.15 mAh/in² 102.56 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 50.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4400 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G77 MC9

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13 15

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Xiaomi Poco F4 and the Motorola Edge 40, dissecting their technical specifications and translating them into real-world implications for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4Motorola Edge 40Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm158.4 x 72 x 7.6 mmEdge 40 is noticeably more compact, making it easier to handle and pocket.
Weight195g167gEdge 40 is significantly lighter, enhancing one-handed use and reducing fatigue.
BuildGlass front/backGlass front, plastic framePoco F4's glass back might feel more premium, but both are susceptible to fingerprints and require a case for drop protection.
Display
TypeAMOLEDpOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. pOLED can be slightly more power-efficient.
Size6.67"6.55"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Refresh Rate120Hz144HzEdge 40's higher refresh rate delivers smoother scrolling and animations, especially noticeable in games and fast-paced content.
Peak Brightness1300 nits1200 nitsPoco F4 might be slightly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870Dimensity 8020Both chipsets offer excellent performance for everyday tasks and demanding games, but benchmarks suggest the Dimensity 8020 holds a slight edge.
RAM6/8GB8GBEdge 40's standard 8GB RAM provides better multitasking and app switching performance.
Camera
Main Camera64MP50MPWhile megapixels aren't everything, the Poco F4's 64MP sensor potentially captures more detail. Image quality depends heavily on processing.
Ultrawide8MP13MPEdge 40's ultrawide offers higher resolution and likely captures wider scenes.
Selfie Camera20MP32MPEdge 40 boasts a higher resolution selfie camera for potentially more detailed self-portraits.
Battery Life
Capacity4500 mAh4400 mAhVery similar battery capacities; real-world battery life will depend on usage patterns and software optimization.
Charging67W wired68W wired , 15W WirelessEdge 40 has marginally faster wired charging. But Edge 40 also features 15W Wireless Charging for convenient top-ups.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: While both phones deliver strong performance, the Motorola Edge 40, with its Dimensity 8020 processor and 8GB RAM, might offer a slight edge in demanding tasks and multitasking.
  • Display: The Edge 40's 144Hz display provides a noticeably smoother visual experience. However, the Poco F4's AMOLED panel might have a slight advantage in peak brightness for outdoor visibility.
  • Camera: It's a close call in the camera department. The Poco F4 boasts a higher resolution main sensor, while the Edge 40 counters with a higher-resolution ultrawide and selfie camera. Real-world image quality will depend on software processing.
  • Design and Build: The Motorola Edge 40 wins in portability due to its lighter and more compact build. However, the Poco F4's glass back might offer a more premium feel.
  • Battery: Battery life should be comparable between the two. The Motorola Edge 40 pulls ahead with the addition of wireless charging, offering more flexibility.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Xiaomi Poco F4: Best suited for users who prioritize a slightly larger display, potentially higher detail in main camera photos, and a premium glass back design.
  • Motorola Edge 40: Ideal for users who value a smooth and responsive display, a compact and lightweight design, faster refresh rates for gaming, and the convenience of wireless charging.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Is portability a top priority? If yes, the Motorola Edge 40's lighter and more compact form factor is a clear winner.
  2. How important is display smoothness? If a high refresh rate for gaming and fluid scrolling is crucial, the Edge 40's 144Hz display is superior.
  3. Do you need wireless charging? If this feature is essential, the Edge 40 is the only option.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 40

While both phones are excellent contenders, I would choose the Motorola Edge 40. The combination of its sleek, lightweight design, incredibly smooth 144Hz display, powerful Dimensity 8020 processor, and the added convenience of wireless charging makes it a compelling package. The slight performance advantage, superior portability, and modern features like the under-display fingerprint sensor outweigh the Poco F4's slightly larger display and higher resolution main camera for my personal preferences. I also appreciate having the latest Android OS out of the box. Ultimately, the Edge 40 feels like a more refined and future-proof device.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.