Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Motorola Edge 30 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 October 7, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 95.5 cm³ 84.91 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 4.05 "/g
Weight 195 g 155 g
Height 163.2 mm 152.9 mm
Width 76 mm 71.2 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green
  • Very Peri
  • Black Onyx
  • Ice Palace
  • Aqua Foam

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.28 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 87.5 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 419 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.15 mAh/in² 101.93 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 47.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4020 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 13 15

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Poco F4 and the Motorola Edge 30 Neo. Both phones occupy the "medium price" range, but their distinct specifications cater to different user priorities.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4Motorola Edge 30 NeoReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mmPoco F4 is taller and wider; Edge 30 Neo is more compact and pocketable.
Weight195g155gEdge 30 Neo is significantly lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
TypeAMOLED, 120HzP-OLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and responsive touch, but AMOLED generally delivers richer blacks and higher peak brightness.
Size6.67"6.28"Poco F4 provides more screen real estate for media consumption and multitasking; Edge 30 Neo offers a more one-handed-friendly experience.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical sharpness; pixel density difference negligible in real-world usage.
HDRHDR10+, Dolby VisionNonePoco F4 supports HDR for enhanced video quality with compatible content.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870Snapdragon 695Poco F4 offers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance, translating to smoother gaming, faster app loading, and better multitasking.
RAM6/8/12GB8GBMore RAM options on the Poco F4 provide flexibility for power users.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.7964MP, f/1.8Similar main camera specifications; real-world image quality will depend on processing and software.
Ultrawide8MP, f/2.213MP, f/2.2Edge 30 Neo boasts a higher resolution ultrawide, potentially capturing more detail. Poco F4 also has a dedicated Macro lens, while the Edge 30 Neo has a combined Wide/Macro lens.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.432MP, f/2.4Edge 30 Neo features a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video4K@60fps1080p@60fpsPoco F4 capable of higher resolution video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity4500 mAh4020 mAhPoco F4 has a larger battery, potentially offering longer usage time.
Charging67W Wired68W Wired, 5W WirelessBoth offer fast wired charging; Edge 30 Neo adds convenient wireless charging.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Poco F4's Snapdragon 870 significantly outperforms the Edge 30 Neo's Snapdragon 695. This translates to a noticeably smoother experience, especially for demanding tasks like gaming and heavy multitasking.
  • Display: While both offer 120Hz refresh rates, the Poco F4's AMOLED screen generally provides better contrast and HDR support, leading to a more visually immersive experience.
  • Size and Weight: The Edge 30 Neo is considerably lighter and more compact, making it ideal for one-handed use and portability. The Poco F4 prioritizes screen real estate.
  • Camera: Both phones have comparable main cameras, but the Edge 30 Neo has a higher-resolution ultrawide and selfie camera, while the Poco F4 can record 4k video at 60fps and has a dedicated macro lens. Ultimately, image quality will depend on real-world testing.
  • Battery and Charging: The Poco F4 boasts a slightly larger battery, but the Edge 30 Neo offers the added convenience of wireless charging.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Xiaomi Poco F4: Suited for users who prioritize performance, a larger display, and high refresh rate for gaming, media consumption, and demanding tasks. The longer battery life is a plus for heavy users.
  • Motorola Edge 30 Neo: Best for users who value a compact and lightweight design, prioritize a good selfie camera, and appreciate the convenience of wireless charging. It's a solid choice for everyday tasks and moderate usage.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What are your performance needs? Heavy gamer or multitasker? The Poco F4 is the clear winner. More casual user? The Edge 30 Neo is sufficient.
  2. How important is portability? Prefer a compact phone for easy one-handed use? The Edge 30 Neo's lighter weight and smaller size are advantageous.
  3. Do you value wireless charging? If this feature is essential, the Edge 30 Neo is the only option.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F4

If I were choosing between these two, I'd opt for the Xiaomi Poco F4. While the Motorola Edge 30 Neo offers a compelling combination of portability and features, the significant performance advantage of the Poco F4 is too crucial for my needs. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, especially for multitasking and occasional gaming. The larger display and potentially longer battery life are also attractive. While I appreciate the convenience of wireless charging, the performance difference and larger display outweigh that benefit for me personally. The dedicated macro lens is also a plus, offering more versatility than a combined ultrawide/macro lens. The slightly larger size and added weight are acceptable trade-offs for the substantial performance gains.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.