Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Honor 200 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Honor 200
Honor 200
Honor

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 May 31, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.5 cm³ 92.77 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.58 "/g
Weight 195 g 187 g
Height 163.2 mm 161.5 mm
Width 76 mm 74.6 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 7.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green
  • Black
  • Emerald Green
  • Moonlight White
  • Coral Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1200 x 2664
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 90 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 436 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.15 mAh/in² 115.84 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 56.05 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 720

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco F4 vs. Honor 200: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Poco F4 and the Honor 200, dissecting their specs and uncovering what they truly offer in real-world usage.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4Honor 200Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.2 x 76 x 7.7161.5 x 74.6 x 7.7Honor 200 slightly more compact
Weight (g)195187Honor 200 feels lighter in hand
Display
TypeAMOLEDOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks; potential for slight differences in color accuracy and power consumption
Size6.67"6.7"Negligible difference in screen real estate
Resolution1080 x 24001200 x 2664Honor 200 noticeably sharper due to higher pixel density
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations
Peak Brightness1300 nits4000 nitsHonor 200 significantly brighter outdoors
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 5GSnapdragon 7 Gen 3Poco F4 boasts a more powerful, proven processor
CPUOcta-core (3.2 GHz Kryo 585...)Octa-core (2.63 GHz Cortex...)Poco F4 likely faster in demanding tasks and multitasking
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 720Honor 200 might have an edge in certain GPU-intensive tasks, but overall performance difference likely minimal in everyday usage
RAM6/8 GB12 GBHonor 200 offers significantly more RAM for smoother multitasking
Camera
Main Camera64MP50MPBoth offer high-resolution photos; image quality depends on sensor and processing
Ultrawide8MP12MPHonor 200's ultrawide likely captures more detail
Macro2MPN/APoco F4 includes a dedicated macro lens, though its low resolution limits practicality
TelephotoN/A50MPHonor 200 offers optical zoom for better long-range shots, a significant advantage
Battery Life
Capacity4500 mAh5200 mAhHonor 200 likely offers longer battery life
Fast Charging67W100WHonor 200 charges significantly faster

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: While the Honor 200 boasts a newer chipset (Snapdragon 7 Gen 3) and double the RAM, the Poco F4's Snapdragon 870 is a more powerful and mature platform. For demanding tasks and gaming, the Poco F4 likely holds a slight edge. The Honor 200’s additional RAM makes it a multitasking champion.
  • Display: Both offer excellent displays, but the Honor 200's higher resolution and significantly higher peak brightness give it a clear advantage, especially in outdoor visibility.
  • Camera: The Honor 200 packs a superior camera system with a high-resolution telephoto lens enabling optical zoom. This is a major differentiator for users who prioritize photography. The Poco F4's macro lens is less compelling due to its low resolution.
  • Battery: The Honor 200 offers a larger battery and blazing fast 100W charging, promising longer usage and quicker top-ups.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco F4: Ideal for users prioritizing performance and value, especially gamers and power users on a tighter budget.
  • Honor 200: Best suited for users who value a bright, sharp display, a versatile camera system with optical zoom, and long battery life. Excellent for photography enthusiasts and social media users.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F4 is generally more affordable.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and demanding tasks favor the Poco F4, while photography and all-day battery life point towards the Honor 200.
  3. Which features matter most? Prioritize performance and value with the Poco F4 or display, camera, and battery with the Honor 200.

My Choice: If I were choosing between these two, I'd lean towards the Honor 200. While the Poco F4 offers a powerful processor, the Honor 200's superior display, versatile camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens, larger battery, and incredibly fast charging are more compelling to me. The slightly higher price is justified by the significant upgrades in key areas that impact my daily usage. I value excellent photography capabilities and a bright, sharp display for media consumption, making the Honor 200 the better fit for my needs. The extra RAM is also a huge bonus for my workflow.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.