Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 September 9, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.5 cm³ 93.51 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.17 "/g
Weight 195 g 199 g
Height 163.2 mm 152.8 mm
Width 76 mm 72 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green
  • Obsidian
  • Hazel
  • Porcelain
  • Rose Quartz

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.3 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1280 x 2856
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 86.9 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 495 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits 2000 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.15 mAh/in² 118.42 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 50.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G715 MC7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13 21

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco F4 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro: A Deep Dive for the Discerning Smartphone User

Hello fellow tech enthusiasts! Alex Griffin here, ready to dissect the Xiaomi Poco F4 and the Google Pixel 9 Pro. We'll go beyond the spec sheet and explore how these devices perform in the real world. Let's dive in!

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4Google Pixel 9 ProReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.2 x 76 x 7.7152.8 x 72 x 8.5Pixel 9 Pro is slightly smaller and thicker. Poco F4 might feel slightly larger in hand.
Weight (g)195199Negligible weight difference; both feel substantial in hand.
Build MaterialsGlass front/backGlass front/backBoth offer premium build quality, but durability depends on specific glass type (e.g., Gorilla Glass Victus).
Display
Size (inches)6.676.3Poco F4 offers a larger screen for media consumption; Pixel 9 Pro is more pocketable.
Resolution1080 x 24001280 x 2856Pixel 9 Pro boasts sharper visuals due to higher pixel density.
TypeAMOLED, 120HzLTPO OLED, 120HzBoth offer vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. Pixel's LTPO allows for dynamic refresh rate, saving battery.
Peak Brightness1300 nits3000 nitsPixel 9 Pro excels in outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 5GGoogle Tensor G4Tensor G4, being newer, likely offers better AI processing and overall performance.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreTensor G4's Cortex-X4 core should provide a significant performance boost over the Kryo 585.
RAM6/8GB16GBPixel 9 Pro's 16GB RAM ensures smoother multitasking and future-proofing.
Camera
Main Sensor64MP50MP Samsung GNKPixel's computational photography prowess often outperforms higher megapixel counts. Real-world testing needed.
Ultrawide8MP48MPPixel 9 Pro offers a significantly higher resolution ultrawide.
TelephotoN/A48MPPixel 9 Pro features a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom.
Battery Life
Capacity4500mAh4700mAhPixel 9 Pro has a slightly larger battery.
Charging67W Fast Charging27W Fast ChargingPoco F4 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Pixel 9 Pro, with its newer Tensor G4 chip and significantly more RAM, will likely outperform the Poco F4 in demanding tasks and multitasking.
  • Display: Both phones offer excellent displays. However, the Pixel 9 Pro's LTPO panel enables better battery efficiency and its higher peak brightness makes it superior outdoors. The Poco F4's larger display may be preferred by media consumers.
  • Camera: While the Poco F4 has a higher resolution main sensor, Google's computational photography and superior hardware in the ultrawide and telephoto lenses likely give the Pixel 9 Pro the edge. Real-world image comparisons are crucial here.
  • Battery and Charging: While the Pixel 9 Pro has a slightly larger battery, the Poco F4's significantly faster charging speed is a major advantage for users who need quick top-ups.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Xiaomi Poco F4: Best for budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display, fast charging, and solid performance for everyday tasks. Gamers on a budget will also appreciate the 120Hz AMOLED display.
  • Google Pixel 9 Pro: Ideal for users who demand the best camera system, a premium user experience, and the latest software innovations. The longer software support offered by Google is a major advantage.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your budget? The Poco F4 is significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your photography needs? The Pixel 9 Pro likely offers a superior camera experience.
  3. Do you prioritize fast charging or a slightly larger battery? The Poco F4 charges much faster, while the Pixel 9 Pro boasts slightly longer battery life due to LTPO technology.

My Choice: As Alex Griffin, I would choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro. While the Poco F4 offers great value, I prioritize the Pixel's superior camera system, the promise of the Tensor G4's AI capabilities, guaranteed long-term software updates, and the brighter, more efficient LTPO display. The faster charging of the Poco F4 is tempting, but the overall package of the Pixel 9 Pro aligns better with my needs and preferences as a tech enthusiast who values cutting-edge technology and a premium user experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.