Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Xiaomi Redmi A3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 28, 2022 February 23, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 105.94 cm³ 106.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.18 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 210 g 193 g
Height 162.5 mm 168.3 mm
Width 76.7 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Stealth Black
  • Knight Silver
  • Cyber Yellow
  • Midnight Black
  • Forest Green (Olive Green)
  • Star Blue (Lake Blue)

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.2 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits 500 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 105.64 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.36 mAh/cm³ 46.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 730 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT and the Xiaomi Redmi A3. Instead of just listing specs, we'll explore how these features translate into real-world experiences for different users.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4 GTXiaomi Redmi A3User Experience Impact
Interface DesignAMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate, Higher ResolutionIPS LCD, 90Hz refresh rate, Lower ResolutionThe Poco F4 GT offers a visually richer and smoother experience with vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and fluid animations. The Redmi A3's display is functional but less immersive.
Interaction FlowSnapdragon 8 Gen 1, 8GB/12GB RAMHelio G36, 3GB/4GB/6GB RAMThe Poco F4 GT ensures snappy performance, effortless multitasking, and lag-free gaming. The Redmi A3 may struggle with demanding tasks and complex applications.
Design ErgonomicsHeavier (210g)Lighter (193g)While the Poco F4 GT boasts superior performance, its weight might be a concern for extended use. The Redmi A3's lighter weight contributes to better one-handed usability.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android FeaturesStandard Android FeaturesBoth devices offer basic accessibility features, but neither excels in providing innovative solutions for users with diverse needs.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a mobile gamer. The Poco F4 GT's powerful Snapdragon processor and Adreno GPU transform it into a portable gaming powerhouse, handling graphically intensive games with ease. The 120Hz display ensures buttery smooth gameplay, providing a competitive edge. On the other hand, the Redmi A3, with its less powerful processor and lower refresh rate, might result in lag and a less enjoyable gaming experience.

Scenario: A photographer capturing a sunset. The Poco F4 GT's 64MP main camera with a wider aperture captures detailed and vibrant images even in challenging lighting conditions. Its advanced features like Night Mode and 4K video recording allow for creative expression. The Redmi A3's 8MP camera, while capable of capturing basic photos, lacks the versatility and quality of the Poco F4 GT.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For Power Users: The Poco F4 GT caters to demanding users who prioritize performance, a premium display, and advanced camera features.
  • For Budget-Conscious Users: The Redmi A3 provides essential smartphone functionality at an affordable price point, making it suitable for users with basic needs.
  • For Users Prioritizing Battery Life: The Redmi A3's slightly larger battery might offer a slight advantage in terms of longevity. However, the Poco F4 GT's significantly faster 120W charging compensates for its smaller battery capacity.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Poco F4 GT prioritizes performance and a premium user experience, reflected in its powerful hardware, high-quality display, and advanced camera system. The Redmi A3 focuses on affordability and essential functionality, sacrificing performance and premium features for a lower price point.

My Choice: As a technology communications specialist focusing on user experience, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT. While the Redmi A3 offers excellent value for its price, the Poco F4 GT delivers a significantly more engaging and satisfying user experience. The fluid AMOLED display, blazing-fast performance, and superior camera capabilities create a truly immersive and enjoyable mobile experience. Its advanced features cater to a wider range of user needs and scenarios, making it a more versatile and future-proof choice. The faster charging drastically reduces downtime, which is crucial in today's fast-paced world, mitigating the slightly smaller battery capacity compared to the Redmi A3. Ultimately, the Poco F4 GT aligns more closely with my emphasis on user-centered design and innovative technology.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.