Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Xiaomi Redmi A2 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 28, 2022 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 105.94 cm³ 115.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.18 "/g 3.4 "/g
Weight 210 g 192 g
Height 162.5 mm 164.9 mm
Width 76.7 mm 76.8 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Stealth Black
  • Knight Silver
  • Cyber Yellow
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.52 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.2 % 81 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 400 nits
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 105.64 mAh/in² 117.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.36 mAh/cm³ 43.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 730 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG microUSB 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT and the Xiaomi Redmi A2. Instead of getting bogged down in technical jargon, we'll explore how these devices translate into real-world experiences for different users.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

Feature CategoryXiaomi Poco F4 GTXiaomi Redmi A2User Experience Impact
Interface DesignAMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate, higher resolutionIPS LCD, 60Hz refresh rate, lower resolutionThe Poco F4 GT offers a visually stunning and incredibly smooth experience. The Redmi A2's display is functional but less vibrant and responsive.
Interaction FlowPowerful Snapdragon processor, ample RAMModest Helio G36 processor, limited RAMThe Poco F4 GT handles multitasking and demanding apps with ease. The Redmi A2 is suited for basic tasks but may struggle with complex applications or heavy gaming.
Accessibility FeaturesSide-mounted fingerprint sensorBasic security featuresThe Poco F4 GT provides convenient and secure biometric unlocking. The Redmi A2 relies on traditional password/PIN security.
Design ErgonomicsSlightly heavier and largerLighter and slightly smallerThe Redmi A2 might be more comfortable for users with smaller hands or those who prioritize portability. The Poco F4 GT's larger screen is better for media consumption.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a mobile gamer. The Poco F4 GT, with its powerful Snapdragon processor, Adreno GPU, and 120Hz AMOLED display, becomes their portable gaming console, delivering smooth, lag-free gameplay and vibrant visuals. The Redmi A2, while capable of casual gaming, might not provide the same immersive experience for demanding titles.

Scenario: Consider a photographer on the go. The Poco F4 GT's superior camera system, with its 64MP main lens and advanced features like laser autofocus, empowers them to capture stunning photos and videos. The Redmi A2's basic camera setup is suitable for everyday snapshots but lacks the versatility and quality of the Poco F4 GT.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For the tech-savvy user: The Poco F4 GT offers cutting-edge performance and features.
  • For the budget-conscious user: The Redmi A2 provides essential functionality at an affordable price.
  • For the senior user: The Redmi A2's simpler interface and lighter weight might be easier to manage. The larger text options on both devices are beneficial.
  • For the student: The Poco F4 GT's multitasking capabilities are valuable for research and productivity, while the Redmi A2 is a budget-friendly option for communication and basic tasks.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Poco F4 GT prioritizes performance and premium experience, reflected in its design choices. The Redmi A2 focuses on affordability and essential functionality, with a design language that reflects simplicity.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT. While the Redmi A2 offers excellent value for its price, my focus on user experience and the power of technology to enhance daily life draws me to the Poco F4 GT. Its superior display, powerful performance, and advanced camera system create a richer, more engaging user experience. The fluidity of the 120Hz display, the responsiveness of the Snapdragon chip, and the creative possibilities offered by the camera align with my appreciation for well-designed technology that seamlessly integrates into a user's workflow and leisure activities. While I recognize the Redmi A2's place in the market for budget-conscious consumers, the Poco F4 GT better embodies the principles of user-centered design and innovative technology that I champion.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.