Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 28, 2022 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 105.94 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.18 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 210 g 192 g
Height 162.5 mm 168 mm
Width 76.7 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Stealth Black
  • Knight Silver
  • Cyber Yellow
  • Starlight Black
  • Startrail Green
  • Startrail Silver

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.2 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness 800 nits 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 105.64 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.36 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT and the Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G. Rather than just listing specs, we'll explore how these features translate into real-world experiences for different users.

Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4 GTXiaomi Redmi 13C 5GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignAMOLED, 120Hz Refresh RateIPS LCD, 90Hz Refresh RatePoco F4 GT offers a visually richer, smoother experience with vibrant colors and fluid animations.
Interaction FlowSnapdragon 8 Gen 1, up to 12GB RAMDimensity 6100+, up to 8GB RAMPoco F4 GT provides significantly faster performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
AccessibilitySide-mounted fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth offer convenient biometric unlocking.
ErgonomicsHeavier (210g), Thinner (8.5mm)Lighter (192g), Thicker (8.1mm)Redmi 13C 5G might be more comfortable for extended use due to its lighter weight.

Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Imagine a mobile gamer, Sarah. For her, the Poco F4 GT's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and 120Hz AMOLED display are game-changers. The smooth visuals and lightning-fast processing power provide a competitive edge, making gameplay immersive and responsive. On the other hand, David, a casual user who prioritizes battery life and affordability, might find the Redmi 13C 5G's larger battery and lower price point more appealing. The reverse charging feature could even allow him to share power with a friend in need.

Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For a senior user, the Redmi 13C 5G's lighter weight might be easier to handle. However, the Poco F4 GT's superior display could be beneficial for those with visual impairments, thanks to the vibrant AMOLED technology. Both phones offer standard accessibility features found in Android.

Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Poco F4 GT is designed for power users seeking top-tier performance and a premium visual experience. Its design philosophy prioritizes speed and responsiveness. The Redmi 13C 5G, on the other hand, embodies a design philosophy centered on affordability and practicality, catering to users who prioritize essential features and longer battery life.

My Choice:

As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT. While the Redmi 13C 5G offers excellent value, my work demands a device that can handle intensive tasks, multitasking, and provide a visually compelling experience for showcasing mobile technology. The Poco F4 GT's superior processor, stunning AMOLED display, and faster charging align perfectly with my need for a responsive and engaging device. The smoother refresh rate and higher resolution are crucial for demonstrating the nuances of mobile interfaces and showcasing the visual fidelity of mobile content. While the weight difference is notable, the performance benefits of the F4 GT outweigh the comfort factor for my specific use case.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.