Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs vivo X100 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 28, 2022 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 105.94 cm³ 109.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.18 "/g 3.07 "/g
Weight 210 g 221 g
Height 162.5 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.7 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Stealth Black
  • Knight Silver
  • Cyber Yellow
  • White
  • Sunset Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.2 % 89.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 105.64 mAh/in² 117.47 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.36 mAh/cm³ 49.1 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4700 mAh 5400 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU Adreno 730 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13 15

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT and the vivo X100 Pro. Instead of getting bogged down in a spec sheet showdown, we'll explore how these devices translate technical capabilities into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4 GTvivo X100 ProUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignGaming-centric, potentially overwhelming for someSleek, minimalist, potentially more broadly appealingImpacts visual appeal and ease of navigation.
Interaction FlowOptimized for speed and performancePotentially smoother due to newer chipset and OSAffects app loading times, multitasking, and overall responsiveness.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility featuresStandard Android accessibility featuresBoth offer standard accessibility features, but customized options are not detailed.
Design ErgonomicsLighter, potentially more comfortable for extended useLarger display, but heavierInfluences one-handed usability and comfort during prolonged use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a photography enthusiast, Sarah, who loves capturing stunning cityscapes at night.

  • Poco F4 GT: Sarah appreciates the dedicated macro lens for capturing intricate details, but struggles with shaky low-light shots.
  • vivo X100 Pro: Sarah is blown away by the X100 Pro's superior camera system with its larger sensor and advanced stabilization, resulting in crisp, clear night photos. The larger screen also provides a more immersive viewing experience when reviewing her shots. However, she might miss the dedicated macro lens for extreme close-ups.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Gamer: The Poco F4 GT's focus on speed and performance, along with gaming-centric features, will appeal to a dedicated gamer.
  • Everyday User: The vivo X100 Pro's refined design, superior camera, and longer battery life might be more appealing to a wider audience.
  • Tech Novice: The cleaner interface of the vivo X100 Pro could be less intimidating for someone less familiar with technology.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing between these phones depends on individual priorities:

  • Prioritize Speed and Gaming: Poco F4 GT
  • Prioritize Camera Quality and Overall Experience: vivo X100 Pro

My Choice: The vivo X100 Pro

While the Poco F4 GT boasts impressive speed, my user-centered approach leans towards the vivo X100 Pro. Its superior camera system, especially for low-light photography, combined with the larger, sharper display, and longer battery life creates a more compelling overall user experience. The newer chipset and OS promise a smoother, more future-proof experience. Although heavier, the benefits in screen real estate and imaging capabilities outweigh the slight increase in weight for me. The design feels more refined and less niche, appealing to a broader range of users beyond hardcore gamers. The leap in camera technology significantly enhances a core smartphone function – capturing memories – making the vivo X100 Pro the winner in my book.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.