Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 28, 2022 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 105.94 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.18 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 210 g 222 g
Height 162.5 mm 162.3 mm
Width 76.7 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Stealth Black
  • Knight Silver
  • Cyber Yellow
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.2 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 105.64 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.36 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4700 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT and the Samsung Galaxy M35, moving beyond the raw numbers to understand how these devices translate into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureXiaomi Poco F4 GTSamsung Galaxy M35User Experience Impact
Interface DesignGaming-centric, potentially overwhelming for some.Likely cleaner, more universally appealing.Poco F4 GT might appeal to specific user groups (gamers), while Galaxy M35 offers broader appeal with a potentially more intuitive interface.
Interaction FlowOptimized for speed and responsiveness.Potentially smoother, more energy-efficient.Poco F4 GT prioritizes performance, while Galaxy M35 balances performance with battery life.
Design ErgonomicsLighter, but potentially less comfortable due to size.Heavier, but possibly more comfortable to hold.User preference will depend on individual hand size and comfort priorities.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: A Day in the Life:

Imagine two users: a passionate mobile gamer (using the Poco F4 GT) and a busy professional who values all-day battery life (using the Galaxy M35).

  • The Gamer: The Poco F4 GT's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor and 120Hz AMOLED display bring their favorite games to life with stunning visuals and lightning-fast response times. The dedicated gaming triggers enhance control and precision.

  • The Professional: The Galaxy M35's massive 6000mAh battery powers them through a full workday without needing a recharge. The clean interface and smooth performance allow for seamless multitasking and productivity.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Tech-Savvy Users: Might appreciate the raw power of the Poco F4 GT.
  • Casual Users: Might find the Galaxy M35 more approachable and user-friendly.
  • Users with Accessibility Needs: Both devices offer standard accessibility features in their respective operating systems. However, specific needs should be assessed based on individual requirements.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Beyond the Specs:

Choosing between these devices isn't just about comparing numbers. It's about understanding which design philosophy aligns best with your individual needs and priorities.

  • Prioritize Performance and Gaming: Poco F4 GT
  • Prioritize Battery Life and Ease of Use: Galaxy M35

My Choice:

As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35. While the Poco F4 GT offers impressive power, my focus on user-centered design and holistic user experience leads me to prioritize the M35's balanced approach. Its longer battery life, cleaner interface, and likely more intuitive user experience cater to a wider range of users and usage scenarios. While I appreciate the cutting-edge performance of the F4 GT, the M35's design better embodies the principles of accessibility and everyday usability that I value. The significantly longer battery life allows for uninterrupted productivity and enjoyment, aligning with a user-centric focus on minimizing disruptions and maximizing utility throughout the day. Ultimately, the M35 offers a more sustainable and inclusive user experience, fitting seamlessly into diverse lifestyles without compromising on essential features.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.