Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 28, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 105.94 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.18 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 210 g 213 g
Height 162.5 mm 161.1 mm
Width 76.7 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Stealth Black
  • Knight Silver
  • Cyber Yellow
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.2 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 105.64 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.36 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13 18

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs. Samsung Galaxy A55: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the numbers. Let's delve into a narrative-driven analysis, focusing on how each device translates technical features into tangible user experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

Feature CategoryXiaomi Poco F4 GTSamsung Galaxy A55User Experience Impact
Interface DesignGaming-centric, potentially overwhelming for average usersClean, minimalist, likely more approachableThe A55 offers a more universally appealing aesthetic. The F4 GT's aggressive design might alienate some.
Interaction FlowOptimized for speed and responsiveness, potentially sacrificing intuitive navigationLikely prioritizes ease of use and smooth transitionsWhile speed is crucial, the A55's focus on smooth navigation may enhance daily usability.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsPotentially enhanced by One UI's accessibility features, leveraging newer Android versionsThe A55, with its newer OS, is likely to offer a more robust suite of accessibility features.
Design ErgonomicsLarger, slightly heavier; dedicated gaming triggersSlimmer, lighter; more comfortable for one-handed useWhile the F4 GT's triggers cater to gamers, the A55 might be more comfortable for everyday tasks.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional who needs a reliable phone for communication, productivity, and occasional entertainment.

  • Poco F4 GT: This phone screams performance. Picture yourself effortlessly switching between demanding work apps, then seamlessly transitioning to a high-octane gaming session thanks to the dedicated shoulder triggers. However, navigating the interface might feel like learning a new language if you're accustomed to a simpler layout.
  • Galaxy A55: This phone whispers elegance and simplicity. Imagine unlocking your phone with an intuitive fingerprint sensor and smoothly navigating through a clean interface. While not a gaming powerhouse, it handles daily tasks with grace and efficiency. The longer software support ensures a future-proof experience.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For the Gamer: The Poco F4 GT's raw power, dedicated triggers, and high refresh rate display are undeniably appealing.
  • For the Everyday User: The A55 offers a more balanced experience, prioritizing ease of use, a longer software update cycle, and a comfortable design.
  • For the Tech Novice: The A55's clean interface and intuitive navigation will likely be less daunting.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Beyond specifications, the choice boils down to your individual priorities:

  • Prioritize Performance and Gaming: Poco F4 GT
  • Prioritize Ease of Use, Longevity, and a Balanced Experience: Samsung Galaxy A55

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A55

While the Poco F4 GT boasts impressive performance, the A55 aligns more closely with my philosophy of user-centered design. Its cleaner interface, likely enhanced accessibility features due to the newer Android version, and commitment to long-term software updates contribute to a more inclusive and sustainable user experience. For the majority of users, the A55’s balanced approach and focus on usability will likely be more rewarding in the long run. It represents a design philosophy that values simplicity, longevity, and user empowerment. In the grand narrative of mobile technology, the A55 resonates as a device designed for real-world use, accessible to a broader audience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.