Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Realme Note 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 28, 2022 January 23, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 105.94 cm³ 102.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.18 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 210 g 186 g
Height 162.5 mm 167.2 mm
Width 76.7 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Stealth Black
  • Knight Silver
  • Cyber Yellow
  • Midnight Black
  • Sky Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.2 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 560 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 105.64 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.36 mAh/cm³ 48.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

The Poco F4 GT vs. Realme Note 50: A Tale of Two Experiences

Let's dive into the world of mobile and explore two distinct devices: the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT and the Realme Note 50. Rather than getting bogged down in a spec sheet showdown, we'll embark on a user-centered journey, focusing on how design and technology converge to shape your everyday experience.

Design and Usability Assessment:

FeaturePoco F4 GTRealme Note 50User Experience Impact
Interface DesignAMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate, 1080x2400 resolutionIPS LCD, 90Hz refresh rate, 720x1600 resolutionThe Poco F4 GT offers a visually richer and smoother experience with vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and more fluid animations. The Realme Note 50's display, while functional, provides a less immersive visual experience.
Interaction FlowSnapdragon 8 Gen 1, 8/12GB RAMUnisoc Tiger T612, 3/4GB RAMThe Poco F4 GT's powerful processor and ample RAM translate to a snappy and responsive user experience, handling multitasking and demanding apps with ease. The Realme Note 50, with its less powerful chipset and limited RAM, may struggle with demanding tasks and exhibit noticeable lag.
Design Ergonomics210g, 8.5mm thick186g, 8mm thickThe Realme Note 50 is lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use. However, the Poco F4 GT's slightly thicker profile might offer a more substantial feel in hand. This is a matter of personal preference.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android FeaturesStandard Android FeaturesBoth devices rely on standard Android accessibility features, offering basic customization options for users with diverse needs.

Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a mobile photographer capturing a vibrant sunset. The Poco F4 GT, with its superior camera system (64MP main sensor, wide-angle lens), allows you to capture the scene in stunning detail and breathtaking clarity. Its advanced features like Gimbal stabilization ensure smooth, professional-looking videos. The Realme Note 50, while capable of capturing decent photos, lacks the resolution and versatility to fully realize your creative vision.

Scenario: You're a mobile gamer immersed in a fast-paced action game. The Poco F4 GT's powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor and 120Hz refresh rate provide a seamless and immersive gaming experience, free from lag and stutter. The Realme Note 50's less powerful processor and lower refresh rate may result in a compromised gaming experience with noticeable performance limitations.

Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both devices cater to a broad user base with their standard Android features. However, the Poco F4 GT's superior performance and display make it a better choice for users who prioritize a premium mobile experience, especially for demanding tasks like gaming and content creation. The Realme Note 50, with its lower price point, may appeal to budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and longer battery life.

Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Poco F4 GT is designed for the user who craves a high-performance, visually stunning mobile experience. Its design philosophy centers around speed, power, and immersive visuals.

The Realme Note 50 prioritizes affordability and essential functionality. Its design caters to the user who seeks a reliable device for everyday tasks without breaking the bank.

My Choice: The Poco F4 GT

While the Realme Note 50 offers a lighter build and slightly larger battery, the Poco F4 GT resonates more strongly with my user-centric approach. Its superior AMOLED display, powerful processor, and advanced camera system create a significantly more engaging and enjoyable user experience. The investment in the smoother performance, richer visuals, and faster charging significantly enhances daily use and creative potential, making it the clear winner for me. The marginal battery size difference is easily offset by the vastly superior 120W fast charging of the Poco F4 GT. In the long run, a device that empowers me to do more, and do it seamlessly, is a more valuable investment.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.