Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Realme C51 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C51
Realme C51
Realme

General

Launch Date April 28, 2022 August 1, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 105.94 cm³ 102.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.18 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 210 g 186 g
Height 162.5 mm 167.2 mm
Width 76.7 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Stealth Black
  • Knight Silver
  • Cyber Yellow
  • Mint Green
  • Carbon Black

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.2 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 560 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 105.64 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.36 mAh/cm³ 48.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

The Speed Demon vs. The Everyday Companion: Poco F4 GT vs. Realme C51

Hello, I'm Sophia Rodriguez, and today we're diving into the fascinating world of mobile technology, exploring two distinct devices: the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT and the Realme C51. We won't just be listing specs; we'll be crafting a narrative, understanding how these phones fit into different lifestyles.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeaturePoco F4 GTRealme C51User Experience Impact
Interface DesignGaming-centric, vibrant, customizableClean, minimalistPoco F4 GT caters to visually stimulating experiences, while Realme C51 prioritizes simplicity and ease of use.
Interaction FlowOptimized for speed and responsivenessStandard Android experiencePoco F4 GT ensures a fluid, lag-free experience, crucial for demanding tasks and gaming. Realme C51 offers a familiar Android experience for general users.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility featuresStandard Android accessibility featuresBoth devices offer basic accessibility features, but further investigation is needed to assess specific implementations for diverse needs.
ErgonomicsLarger, heavier build; dedicated gaming triggersLighter, slimmer profilePoco F4 GT's design prioritizes performance over extended comfort, while Realme C51 offers a more comfortable grip for everyday use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a mobile gamer, Sarah, captivated by the latest visually intensive game. The Poco F4 GT's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor and 120Hz AMOLED display become her gateway to a seamless, immersive gaming world. The dedicated gaming triggers provide a console-like experience, giving her a competitive edge. Conversely, David, a student focused on communication and affordability, finds the Realme C51's lightweight design and long-lasting 5000mAh battery perfectly suited to his needs. The streamlined interface allows for efficient multitasking between classes and social media.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Power User: For tech enthusiasts and gamers, the Poco F4 GT offers a superior experience with its powerful hardware and specialized features.
  • Budget-Conscious User: The Realme C51 provides excellent value for its price, catering to users who prioritize essential features and affordability.
  • Accessibility Needs: Both phones offer standard Android accessibility features. However, a more in-depth analysis focusing on specific needs (e.g., visual or auditory impairments) is required for a comprehensive evaluation.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Poco F4 GT is a performance-driven device designed for users who demand the best in speed, visuals, and gaming capabilities. The Realme C51, on the other hand, is a practical and budget-friendly option for users prioritizing essential features and ease of use.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, focusing on user experience and acknowledging diverse needs, I would choose the Poco F4 GT. While the Realme C51 offers excellent value, the Poco F4 GT's commitment to a high-quality user experience, particularly in performance and display, resonates with my analytical framework. The investment in advanced technology translates into a significantly enhanced user experience, justifying the higher price point for demanding users. Its superior display, faster processor, and gaming-centric features offer a richer, more engaging interaction, aligning with my mission to make technology exciting and accessible. However, I strongly emphasize that the "best" choice is ultimately determined by individual user needs and priorities. For users on a tight budget with basic needs, the Realme C51 provides an excellent alternative.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.