1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco F3 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.7 × 76.4 × 7.8 mm | 164.1 × 75.8 × 8.6 mm | Poco F3 is thinner (7.8mm vs 8.6mm), making it feel slightly sleeker in hand. ZTE is slightly narrower making it negligibly more comfortable to hold. |
| Weight | 196g | 189g | ZTE is lighter by 7g, potentially more comfortable for extended use but the difference is minimal |
| Build Quality (Screen) | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | Poco F3 has a more durable screen, less prone to scratches and accidental damage; ZTE A75 screen protection is not specified. |
Display
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco F3 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.67" | 6.6" | Almost identical screen sizes, negligible difference for typical usage. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1612 | Poco F3 has significantly sharper visuals, text, and images due to much higher pixel density; the ZTE may look less crisp. |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 395 | 267 | Poco F3 offers a much clearer and more detailed viewing experience. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | Poco F3 delivers more vibrant colours, deeper blacks, better contrast, and improved power efficiency for dark themes; ZTE has standard LCD quality |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz | Poco F3 provides smoother scrolling and animations, which enhances perceived responsiveness compared to the ZTE. |
| Brightness | 1300 nits | 0 nits | Poco F3 is vastly superior for outdoor visibility in bright sunlight, the ZTE is unlikely to be usable in sunlight; ZTE brightness not specified |
Performance
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco F3 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Poco F3 has a considerably more powerful processor, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance; ZTE is a budget chipset, and will struggle with intensive tasks. |
| AnTuTu Score | 800,216 | 240,000 | Poco F3 has significantly higher benchmark scores, indicating much superior performance for any demanding tasks or gaming; ZTE will likely only provide acceptable performance for basic tasks like browsing and social media. |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G57 MP1 | Poco F3 has a much more capable GPU, offering significantly better gaming and graphics performance; ZTE GPU is quite basic and suitable for simple games. |
Camera
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco F3 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera | 48MP f/1.79, 1/2" Sony IMX582 | 50MP f/1.8 | Poco F3 offers a slightly wider aperture for better low-light photos and larger sensor size; however the ZTE has 2MP more resolution, the overall quality between the phones is unknown, but given the superior image processor of the Poco F3, the Poco is expected to provide higher quality pictures. |
| Selfie Camera | 20MP f/2.45, 1/3.4" Samsung S5K3T2 | 8MP | Poco F3 has a much higher-resolution front-facing camera, offering sharper and more detailed selfies; the ZTE may be less detailed. |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@up to 960fps with EIS | 1080p@30fps | Poco F3 can record higher-quality 4K videos and supports higher frame rate 1080p slow-motion capture; providing much more versitility than the ZTE's 1080p recording. |
| Camera Features | 4K, Triple Cam, EIS, many additional modes | Dual Camera, PDAF, EIS, HDR and several modes | Poco F3 offers more features like 4k capture, manual focus, and triple camera, whereas the ZTE has dual camera and phase detection autofocus; the Poco's Triple camera will likely offer more shooting flexibility. |
Battery
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco F3 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4520mAh | 5000mAh | ZTE has a slightly larger battery, possibly leading to slightly longer battery life under similar usage conditions; however, this may be reduced due to the lower efficiency chipset. |
| Charging | 33W fast charging | 22.5W fast charging | Poco F3 charges faster, reducing downtime; given the smaller battery, it may fully charge faster than the ZTE despite the smaller battery. |
| Features | QC3+/PD3.0 support | Non-removable | Poco F3 supports faster charging standards, improving charging speed; both have non-removable batteries. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Xiaomi Poco F3 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED, 120Hz, much higher resolution and brightness, resulting in vibrant visuals, smooth animations, and excellent outdoor visibility.
- Much Faster Performance: Snapdragon 870 chipset offers significantly better app loading, multitasking, and gaming performance.
- Better Cameras: Higher resolution selfie camera, more versatile video recording options (4K, slow motion), and expected better low light main camera performance.
- Faster Charging: Supports 33W fast charging for quick battery replenishment.
- More Advanced Connectivity: Newer WiFi standard and more comprehensive Bluetooth support, and GPS support for better navigation.
- Enhanced Audio: Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, and stereo speakers for a more immersive audio experience.
Better Screen Protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 is much more durable and resistant to scratches.
Better Sensor Suite additional sensor means more versatility in use.
Practical Implications: The Poco F3 is a significantly higher performance device, better for gaming, media consumption, and general usage, and will be faster for all common tasks.
ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:
- Slightly Larger Battery: Offers a slightly larger battery, potentially leading to marginally longer battery life.
- Newer Android Version: Ships with Android 13 out of the box, providing the latest software features, and may receive longer support compared to older android versions.
- Slightly Lighter 7g lighter may be marginally easier to hold.
Practical Implications: The ZTE A75 4G's main strength is its slightly larger battery and newer android version, which may appeal to users with basic needs.
Trade-offs:
- Poco F3: Older software out of the box.
- ZTE Blade A75 4G: Significantly inferior performance, display, cameras, and charging speed.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Xiaomi Poco F3 Ideal User:
- Power users: Those who need fast performance for demanding apps and multitasking.
- Gamers: Individuals who desire smooth graphics and responsiveness.
- Media consumers: People who prioritize high-quality video and immersive audio experiences.
- Photography enthusiasts: Users who appreciate versatile camera features and good quality photos and videos.
- Users who want the best display possible: Anyone wanting to have high quality visuals, or to see their device in bright sunlight.
Use Cases:
- Playing graphically intensive mobile games.
- Watching high-resolution movies and videos.
- Editing photos and videos on the go.
- Daily use where speed and responsiveness are a priority.
ZTE Blade A75 4G Ideal User:
- Budget-conscious buyers: Users who prioritize affordability over performance and features.
- Basic smartphone users: People who primarily use their phones for calling, texting, and browsing social media.
- Users that require a long battery that do not require intensive tasks.
Use Cases:
- Basic web browsing and social media scrolling.
- Making calls and sending text messages.
- Using simple apps for daily tasks.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- Poco F3: Offers a high price-to-value ratio considering its performance, display, and camera quality, even in an older model.
- ZTE Blade A75 4G: Provides a budget-friendly option with basic features and acceptable performance for those on a very tight budget.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your primary use case? (Gaming, media, general usage or basic use)
- How important is display quality and outdoor visibility? (Clear sharp image, or just basic visibility in bright light.)
- What is your budget? (Very tight or somewhat flexible)
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1 (Performance Focused): If you want high performance for gaming, video editing, and demanding apps, the Xiaomi Poco F3 is the clear choice.
- Scenario 2 (Budget Focused): If you have a very tight budget and need a phone for basic tasks, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is a viable option, but prepare for a significantly lower performance experience.
- Scenario 3 (General Usage): If you want a good all-around device for general use, the Xiaomi Poco F3 offers an excellent balance of performance, display quality, and camera capabilities.
My Choice
If I had to choose between these two devices, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F3. The vastly superior performance, much better display, faster charging, more versatile camera, enhanced audio, and higher quality build make it the better choice for almost all user profiles. While the ZTE does have a slightly larger battery and a newer version of Android, these advantages do not come close to balancing the huge performance and display trade-off with the Poco F3. Even though it is an older device, the Poco F3 is still a very capable smartphone, whereas the ZTE Blade A75 4G is a budget device that does not compete on equal footing.
