Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2021 April 2, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 97.55 cm³ 104.18 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.27 "/g
Weight 196 g 208 g
Height 163.7 mm 164.3 mm
Width 76.4 mm 74.6 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Arctic White
  • Night Black
  • Deep Ocean Blue
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Black
  • Green
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.81 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1440 x 3200
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.9 % 91.4 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 515 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.60 mAh/in² 107.81 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.33 mAh/cm³ 47.99 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4520 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 660

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Xiaomi Mi 11 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.7 × 76.4 × 7.8 mm164.3 × 74.6 × 8.5 mmMi 11 Pro is slightly taller & thicker, but narrower. Poco F3 might feel slightly wider in hand, Mi 11 Pro has a slightly larger overall volume.
Weight196g208gPoco F3 is lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use. The 12g difference might be noticeable to some.
Display
Size6.67"6.81"Mi 11 Pro has a slightly larger screen, offering a more immersive experience for media consumption.
Resolution1080x24001440x3200Mi 11 Pro has significantly sharper display, leading to clearer text and images, and finer details.
PPI395515Mi 11 Pro's higher pixel density results in a noticeably crisper display, more pleasing to the eye.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks, standard for high-quality screens.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations for a fluid user experience.
Brightness1300 nits1700 nitsMi 11 Pro is significantly brighter, offering better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 870 (7 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (5 nm)Mi 11 Pro's chip is more powerful, providing better performance in demanding tasks & gaming.
AnTuTu Score800,216854,267Mi 11 Pro has a higher benchmark score, indicating superior performance, although the difference might not be noticeable in casual usage.
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 660Mi 11 Pro's more powerful GPU offers better graphics performance for gaming and graphic-intensive applications.
Battery
Capacity4520mAh5000mAhMi 11 Pro's larger battery might offer slightly longer battery life.
Charging33W Fast Charging67W Fast ChargingMi 11 Pro charges significantly faster, reducing downtime.
FeaturesQC3+/PD3.0Reverse charging, 67W wireless charging, 10W reverse wireless chargingMi 11 Pro has more versatile charging options, including wireless and reverse charging.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.79, 1/2" sensor, Sony IMX58250MP, f/1.95, 1/1.12" sensor, Samsung GN2Mi 11 Pro has a larger sensor and higher resolution, resulting in better low-light performance and more detail.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.45, 1/3.4", Samsung S5K3T220MP, f/2.3, 1/3.4", Samsung S5K3T2Mi 11 Pro has a slightly wider aperture, potentially better low-light selfies.
Wide Angle lensNone13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06", Omnivision OV13B10Mi 11 Pro offers a dedicated wide-angle lens for more versatile photography, Poco F3 lacks it entirely.
Telephoto/Macro lensNone8MP, 1/4.4", Omnivision OV08A10Mi 11 Pro offers a dedicated telephoto and macro lens, increasing versatility, which is missing on the Poco F3.
Video4K@30fps, 1080p various fps w/EIS8K@24fps, 4K@60fps w/HDR, EISMi 11 Pro can record in higher 8K resolution & better HDR processing, and more versatile video features.
DxOMarkNot TestedOverall: 124, Photo: 118, Video: 132Mi 11 Pro has been independently tested by DxOMark and showed good photo/video qualities
Features4K Video, digital zoom, triple camera, etc.8K Video, optical zoom, triple camera, OIS, Ultra stable video, etc.Mi 11 Pro has advanced video recording and stabilization options like OIS, along with optical zoom not present in the Poco F3.
Software
OSAndroid 11, upgradeable to 13Android 11Poco F3's OS is upgradeable to 13. The Mi 11 Pro lacks information regarding future upgrades.
Connectivity
WiFiWiFi 6WiFi 6Both have similar WiFi speeds, and features like Wi-Fi MiMO, Wi-Fi Direct etc.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.1Bluetooth 5.2Mi 11 Pro has a slightly newer Bluetooth standard, possibly offering a more stable connection and slightly improved power efficiency.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1+E5a), BeiDou (B2), NavIC SystemGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1+E5a), BeiDou (B2), NavIC SystemMi 11 Pro supports more satellite systems for potentially more precise location tracking.
SIMDual SIMDual SIMBoth support Dual SIM functionality, offering users the flexibility of using two SIM cards.
Storage
Internal128GB/256GB128GB/256GBBoth have similar internal storage options, offering the same maximum storage amount.
RAM6GB/8GB8GB/12GBMi 11 Pro offers a higher RAM option, improving multitasking and gaming performance.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone has expandable storage options, which can be a disadvantage for users who require a lot of storage.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersHi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphonesBoth offer good audio quality with stereo speakers. Poco F3 supports Dolby Atmos while Mi 11 Pro comes with 3 microphones.
Security
FeaturesSide-mounted fingerprint sensorBasic fingerprint sensorPoco F3 offers an arguably more convenient side-mounted fingerprint sensor; Mi 11 Pro has a basic sensor which implies an in-display fingerprint sensor.
Build Quality
ProtectionGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass VictusMi 11 Pro has superior screen protection, more resistant to scratches and breakage.
Sensors
SensorsBiometric: Fingerprint; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope; Proximity: Ultrasonic proximity virtualBiometric: Fingerprint, Heart Rate; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeMi 11 Pro additionally features heart rate sensor and a standard proximity sensor, while the Poco F3 comes with an ultrasonic proximity sensor

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F3 Advantages:

  • Lighter and slightly thinner: More comfortable to hold for extended periods.
  • Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: Some users find side-mounted sensors faster and more convenient.
  • Dolby Atmos: Can provide more immersive audio experience for media consumption.

Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior display: Higher resolution, greater pixel density, and higher brightness makes for a significantly better viewing experience, especially in bright sunlight.
  • More powerful processor and GPU: Better performance for demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
  • Larger battery and much faster charging: Longer battery life and quicker charging times, convenient for users who are always on the go.
  • More versatile camera system: Features dedicated wide-angle and telephoto lenses, offering more creative photography options, as well as 8K video recording capabilities.
  • Better video recording and stabilization: Offers 8K video recording, optical zoom, and superior video stabilization.
  • Wireless and reverse wireless charging: Adds additional convenience.
  • More RAM Option: Offers higher RAM, suitable for heavy usage.
  • Superior screen protection: Gorilla Glass Victus provides better protection against scratches and drops.
  • Heart Rate Sensor: Includes a heart rate sensor, allowing for basic fitness tracking.

Trade-offs:

  • The Mi 11 Pro is heavier and thicker, which some might find less comfortable, and is more expensive than the Poco F3.
  • Poco F3 lacks the advanced camera features and superior display of the Mi 11 Pro, but it is significantly more affordable.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F3 Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users: Who want a good balance of performance and features at a lower price.
  • Gamers on a budget: Who want smooth gaming performance but do not need the absolute best graphics performance.
  • Everyday users: Who prioritize a lightweight and comfortable device for daily tasks like social media, browsing, and media consumption.
  • Users who don't prioritize camera: Who do not need a versatile camera setup and only need the basic functions.

Use Cases:

  • Casual gaming
  • Daily social media and browsing
  • Media consumption
  • Basic photography needs

Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro Ideal User:

  • Enthusiast users: Who want top-tier performance and the best available features.
  • Photography enthusiasts: Who want a versatile camera system with high-quality images and video recording capabilities.
  • Heavy multitaskers and gamers: Who require a powerful processor, large RAM, and a high refresh rate display for demanding tasks.
  • Users who prioritize display quality: Who want the best viewing experience, especially in bright outdoor conditions.
  • Users who need long battery life: and fast charging.
  • Users who want convenience: Offered by wireless and reverse wireless charging.

Use Cases:

  • High-end mobile gaming
  • Professional-quality photography and videography
  • Heavy multitasking with demanding apps
  • Outdoor use with high visibility under bright light
  • Wireless charging convenience

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • Poco F3: Offers excellent value for the price, providing a good balance of performance and features at a more affordable cost.
  • Mi 11 Pro: Is more expensive but offers significant upgrades in display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Budget: What is your budget for a smartphone? (Poco F3 is significantly cheaper)
  2. Priorities: Do you prioritize a high-end display and camera, or is performance sufficient? (Mi 11 Pro is superior in display/camera)
  3. Use case: What will you primarily use your phone for? (Heavy gamers or photo enthusiasts will find more value in the Mi 11 Pro)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget gaming and everyday use: The Poco F3 is the better choice due to its lower price and good performance for casual usage.

  • Scenario 2: Professional photography, video, and high-end gaming: The Mi 11 Pro is the better option with its superior camera system, processing power, and better display.

  • Scenario 3: All-around user with some heavy use: The Mi 11 Pro is recommended due to its superior display and enhanced features. The increase in price is justified by the increase in quality.

My Choice

Given the choice, I would choose the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro. While the Poco F3 offers excellent value, the Mi 11 Pro's comprehensive upgrades in display quality, processing power, camera versatility, and battery features make it the superior device overall. My primary use cases lean towards photography and videography, requiring the best possible hardware and image quality which the Mi 11 Pro provides. The superior display and faster charging, plus additional features like wireless charging, are valuable additions, even if the phone is heavier and more expensive.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.