Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2021 September 1, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 97.55 cm³ 100.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 196 g 189 g
Height 163.7 mm 159.9 mm
Width 76.4 mm 75.1 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Arctic White
  • Night Black
  • Deep Ocean Blue
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Purple
  • Awesome Mint

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.9 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.60 mAh/in² 106.51 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.33 mAh/cm³ 44.61 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4520 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 13 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Xiaomi Poco F3 and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G, focusing on practical implications:

Design

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GPractical Impact
Dimensions163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mmPoco F3 is taller and wider, but slightly thinner. A52s is more compact but thicker, may feel more substantial.
Weight196g189gA52s is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.
BuildCorning Gorilla Glass 5 frontCorning Gorilla Glass 5 frontBoth offer similar scratch resistance on the screen.

Display

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GPractical Impact
Size6.67"6.5"Poco F3 has a slightly larger screen for more immersive viewing.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Both have the same sharpness, but slight difference in pixel density.
PPI395405Both displays are very sharp; difference is negligible.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDVibrant colors and deep blacks on both phones.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth provide smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness1300 nits800 nitsPoco F3 is much brighter and significantly better under bright sunlight.

Performance

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GPractical Impact
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 5G (7nm)Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm)Poco F3's 870 offers significantly higher performance, faster app loading, and smoother gaming.
AnTuTu Score800,216570,752Poco F3 demonstrates better overall performance, noticeable in demanding tasks and gaming.
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 642LPoco F3's GPU offers better graphics performance, impacting gaming and video editing.

Camera

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GPractical Impact
Main Camera48MP, f/1.79, 1/2"64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7"A52s has a higher resolution and slightly larger sensor, potentially capturing more detail and better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.45, 1/3.4"32MP, f/2.0A52s captures more detailed selfies with a wider aperture for better low-light results.
Wide Angle LensNone12MP, f/2.2A52s offers more versatility with a wide angle lens.
Portrait (Depth) LensNone5MP, f/2.4A52s provides better portrait photos with a dedicated depth sensor.
Macro LensNone5MP, f/2.4A52s has macro capabilities for close-up shots.
Video4K@30fps, EIS, up to 960fps slow-mo4K@30fps, EIS, up to 120fps slow-moBoth record high quality video with EIS but Poco F3 offers higher slow-motion fps. Samsung's OIS is missing on Poco F3.
Camera FeaturesTriple cam, Digital Zoom, EIS, No OIS, manual focusQuad cam, Digital Zoom, OIS, PDAFA52s offers a versatile camera system with OIS for stable videos and PDAF for faster focusing

Battery

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GPractical Impact
Capacity4520 mAh4500 mAhBoth offer similar battery capacity. Battery life will depend on usage.
Charging33W Fast Charging, Li-Polymer25W Fast Charging, Li-IonPoco F3 charges faster, reducing downtime.
FeaturesQC3+ / PD3.0 supportNonePoco F3 has faster charging protocol

Software & Other

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GPractical Impact
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 13)Android 11 (upgradable to 14)A52s has better long-term software support and updates.
WiFiWiFi 6, MiMOWiFi 6Both feature the latest WiFi standards.
Bluetooth5.1, APT-x, LDAC5.0Poco F3 has newer Bluetooth version with higher quality codecs.
GPSAdvanced GPS supportStandard GPS supportPoco F3 provides more accurate positioning.
Storage128/256GB, no expandable storage128/256GB, no expandable storageBoth have similar storage options.
RAM6GB/8GB6GB/8GBBoth offer sufficient RAM for smooth multitasking.
AudioDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersDolby AtmosPoco F3 offers better overall audio quality with Hi-Res, Stereo Speakers
SecuritySide-mounted fingerprintBasic FingerprintPoco F3’s side mounted fingerprint reader is typically faster
SensorsComprehensive suiteComprehensive suite with Hall & GeomagneticA52s offers extra sensor for additional features

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F3 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 870 offers significantly faster processing and better gaming performance.
  • Brighter Display: The 1300 nits brightness makes it much more usable in direct sunlight.
  • Faster Charging: 33W charging is significantly faster than A52s's 25W.
  • Better Audio: Hi-Res Audio and Stereo Speakers offer a more immersive audio experience.
  • More Advanced GPS: Better positioning accuracy with more satellite systems.
  • Newer Bluetooth: Supports higher quality codecs for better audio.

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Advantages:

  • More Versatile Camera System: Includes wide-angle, macro, and depth sensors, plus OIS.
  • Better Selfie Camera: Higher resolution with a wider aperture for superior selfies.
  • Longer Software Support: Guaranteed to receive more software updates.
  • Slightly Lighter: Might be more comfortable to use for extended periods.
  • More Compact: Easier to handle for some users.
  • Hall and Geomagnetic sensor: Additional sensors for enhanced user experience.

Trade-offs:

  • Poco F3: Sacrifices camera versatility and long-term software support for performance and display brightness.
  • A52s: Sacrifices performance and display brightness for a better camera system, more sensors and long-term software support.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F3 is ideal for:

  • Gamers: The powerful Snapdragon 870 and Adreno 650 deliver a superior gaming experience.
  • Multimedia Consumers: The brighter display and enhanced audio are great for video streaming and content consumption.
  • Power Users: Those who prioritize speed and performance for multitasking.
  • Users in Sunny Environments: The higher brightness display provides significantly better outdoor visibility.

Specific use cases:

  • Gaming, including demanding titles with high frame rates.
  • Watching high-resolution videos outdoors.
  • Heavy multitasking with multiple apps running simultaneously.
  • Users who do not require a highly versatile camera system.

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is ideal for:

  • Photography Enthusiasts: The versatile camera system offers more flexibility for different shooting scenarios.
  • Users Who Value Software Updates: Guaranteed to receive longer software support from Samsung.
  • Everyday Users: Well-rounded device with a reliable camera and adequate performance for everyday tasks.
  • Those Seeking a More Compact Device: Easier to handle and pocket.

Specific use cases:

  • Taking photos in various settings with wide-angle, macro, and portrait capabilities.
  • Capturing stable videos with OIS.
  • Users who need long-term software updates and want a reliable phone.
  • Users who want a more compact phone.

4. Decision Framework

Here are three key questions for buyers to consider:

  1. How important is performance vs. camera versatility? If you prioritize fast performance and gaming, the Poco F3 is the better choice. If you need a versatile camera system, the A52s is a strong contender.
  2. What's your typical usage environment? If you frequently use your phone outdoors under bright sunlight, the Poco F3's brighter screen is a significant advantage.
  3. How important is long-term software support? The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G will receive more Android updates compared to the Poco F3.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Gamer on a budget: Choose Xiaomi Poco F3 for superior gaming performance and a high refresh rate screen.
  • Scenario 2: Photography enthusiast wanting a versatile camera: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G for its better camera capabilities, especially with the inclusion of OIS and multiple lens options.
  • Scenario 3: User who needs a reliable phone with long-term updates: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G for longer software support and security updates.
  • Scenario 4: Someone who uses phone outside in bright sunlight Choose the Xiaomi Poco F3 for its much brighter display.

Personal Choice

Personally, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F3. While the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G offers a more versatile camera system and better long-term software support, my priorities lean towards performance and display quality. The significantly faster Snapdragon 870 chipset and the brighter 1300 nits AMOLED screen on the Poco F3 would provide a much smoother and more enjoyable experience for my daily usage, which includes heavy multitasking, gaming, and outdoor usage in bright environments. The trade-off with the camera, while a significant point, is something that I could manage with.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.