Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Samsung Galaxy A34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2021 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 97.55 cm³ 103.3 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 196 g 199 g
Height 163.7 mm 161.3 mm
Width 76.4 mm 78.1 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Arctic White
  • Night Black
  • Deep Ocean Blue
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.9 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.60 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.33 mAh/cm³ 48.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4520 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13 17

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Xiaomi Poco F3 vs. Samsung Galaxy A34

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Samsung Galaxy A34Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.7 × 76.4 × 7.8 mm161.3 × 78.1 × 8.2 mmPoco F3 is slightly taller and thinner, A34 is wider and thicker, affecting hand feel and pocketability.
Weight196g199gNegligible difference in weight, both feel similar in hand
Display
Size6.67"6.6"Very similar screen size, a difference of 0.07" is virtually unnoticeable.
Resolution1080x24001080x2340Very similar resolution and pixel density.
PPI395390Negligible difference in pixel density, both offer crisp display
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth have vibrant AMOLED displays, offering deep blacks and rich colors
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animation for enhanced viewing experience.
Brightness1300 nits0 nitsPoco F3 has significantly higher brightness, making it much easier to see in direct sunlight. A34 brightness is unspecified.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 870Mediatek Dimensity 1080Snapdragon 870 is significantly more powerful, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score800,216532,300Poco F3 has much higher benchmark score, indicating faster performance and smoother operation.
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G68 MC4Adreno 650 is more powerful, offering better graphics performance, especially in gaming.
Battery
Capacity4520mAh5000mAhA34 has slightly larger battery, potentially leading to longer usage between charges.
Charging33W25WPoco F3 charges faster, minimizing downtime.
Camera
Standard (Main)48MP, f/1.7948MP, f/1.8Poco F3 has slightly wider aperture (f/1.79), better in low light but virtually same performance.
Selfie20MP, f/2.4513MP, f/2.2Poco F3 has higher resolution, A34 has slightly wider aperture and larger sensor, potentially better low light.
Wide AngleNone5MP, f/2.2A34 offers more versatility with an ultra-wide lens for landscape shots.
Portrait Mode (Depth)None5MP, f/2.4A34 can capture depth information for better portrait shots.
Video (Main)Up to 4K@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsBoth offer 4K video. Poco F3 has more recording modes, but Samsung has Optical Image Stabilization (OIS).
Video StabilizationEISEIS, OISA34 has optical stabilization for smoother video capture.
DXOMarkNot TestedMain: 92 (Photo: 99, Video: 78)A34 has been tested and scored well, Poco F3 has no score available.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 13)Android 13 (upgradable to 17)A34 ships with newer OS and will receive longer software support.
Connectivity
WiFiWiFi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Poco F3 supports newer WiFi 6 standard, offering faster speeds and better performance in crowded networks.
Bluetooth5.15.3A34 has the latest version, better range and battery life for peripherals
GPSMore systems, Dual-bandStandardPoco F3 should offer greater accuracy, thanks to dual-band GPS.
Storage
Internal128/256 GB128/256 GBBoth offer same internal storage options.
RAM6/8 GB6/8 GBBoth offer the same RAM options.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone has expandable storage.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Hi-Res AudioDolby AtmosPoco F3 has Hi-Res audio support offering higher quality audio playback.
Security
FeaturesSide-mounted fingerprintBasic fingerprintPoco F3 has more advanced fingerprint sensor.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 5UnknownPoco F3 screen has better protection against scratches and impacts.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F3 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 870 chipset offers significantly better processing power and graphics performance compared to the Dimensity 1080, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming.
  • Brighter Display: 1300 nits of brightness provides better outdoor visibility in direct sunlight.
  • Faster Charging: 33W fast charging replenishes the battery more quickly than the A34’s 25W.
  • Better WiFi: Supports newer WiFi 6 standard, offering faster speeds, lower latency and better performance in crowded networks.
  • More Precise GPS: More satellite system support, offering greater location accuracy.
  • Hi-Res Audio: Enhanced audio quality, better spatial audio for music and media.
  • More advanced Fingerprint Sensor: The side mounted sensor is better than the basic fingerprint sensor.
  • Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 offers superior screen protection than the unspecified screen of the A34

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Newer Software: Ships with Android 13 and has an update path to Android 17, ensuring longer software support.
  • Larger Battery: Slightly larger 5000mAh battery may offer marginally longer battery life.
  • Versatile Camera System: Includes wide angle and depth sensors, offering more flexible shooting options.
  • Optical Image Stabilization (OIS): Provides better video stabilization and sharper low-light images.
  • Tested Camera: Has been tested by DxOMark providing good camera scores.
  • Newer Bluetooth: Supports newer Bluetooth 5.3, which offers better range and efficiency.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • The Poco F3 sacrifices camera versatility (no wide angle or portrait mode) and software longevity for superior performance and a brighter screen.
  • The Galaxy A34 trades peak performance and display brightness for a more versatile camera setup and longer software support.
  • The Poco F3 lacks OIS which helps in video recording, while the Galaxy A34 lacks Hi-Res audio.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F3 Ideal Users:

  • Gamers: Benefit from the powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset, better GPU and faster display refresh rate for smooth and immersive gaming.
  • Power Users: Those who need fast app loading, seamless multitasking and overall smooth performance for demanding use cases.
  • Multimedia Consumers: Users who enjoy Hi-Res audio and want a brighter display for outdoor viewing of content.
  • Those valuing Performance: Users who prioritize raw performance and speed over camera versatility or software longevity.
  • Users who prioritize build quality: Users who want better screen protection.

Samsung Galaxy A34 Ideal Users:

  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who want a flexible camera system with wide-angle and depth sensors for more creative shots and better video stabilization.
  • Users seeking Long Software Support: Those who want the latest Android version and the peace of mind of longer software updates.
  • Everyday Users: Individuals who prioritize battery life, a decent camera, and a modern user experience.
  • Users who want a more well-rounded smartphone experience: Those who value a balanced set of features and a good camera performance over raw processing power.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. How important is raw performance for me? (Gaming, demanding apps)
  2. Do I need advanced camera features like ultra-wide and portrait modes or is good quality more important?
  3. How much do I value long-term software support?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Gaming and Performance Focus: If gaming and high performance are priorities, the Xiaomi Poco F3 is the clear winner due to its significantly more powerful chipset and superior GPU.
  • Scenario 2: Versatile Camera and Software Longevity: If you prioritize camera flexibility, software updates, and a well-rounded experience, the Samsung Galaxy A34 will serve you better.
  • Scenario 3: All-Round Usage: For general usage, the Xiaomi Poco F3 has the more capable processor, better display but loses out on camera versatility and software updates. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a well-rounded phone that does not have a clear advantage in any single aspect over the Poco F3, however, it has a slightly better camera and more software updates.
  • Scenario 4: Outdoor Visibility: If the user uses their phone outdoors often, the Xiaomi Poco F3 is a better choice due to its much brighter display.

My Choice and Why

I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F3. My reasoning is based on the fact that I value smooth performance for everyday use, especially in apps and browsing and also for gaming. The significantly more powerful chipset and GPU of the Poco F3 would provide a better experience for these use cases. While the Samsung Galaxy A34 is a well-rounded phone, its performance is weaker and would not satisfy the demanding tasks that I do with my phone on a regular basis. Even though I appreciate software updates, the performance gap is too big to be ignored. I also appreciate a brighter display for outdoor use, which the Poco F3 offers and better screen protection. While the Samsung has a more versatile camera system with wide-angle and depth lenses, the standard camera performance between the two phones is very similar. Thus, a more powerful, brighter and faster screen is more beneficial to me than a more versatile camera setup.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.