Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Samsung Galaxy A25 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2021 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 97.55 cm³ 102.23 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 196 g 197 g
Height 163.7 mm 161 mm
Width 76.4 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Arctic White
  • Night Black
  • Deep Ocean Blue
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.9 % 84.2 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.60 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.33 mAh/cm³ 48.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4520 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 13 18

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Xiaomi Poco F3 vs. Samsung Galaxy A25

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Samsung Galaxy A25Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.7 × 76.4 × 7.8 mm161 × 76.5 × 8.3 mmPoco F3 is slightly taller, A25 is slightly thicker. Differences are marginal and may not be noticeable in daily use.
Weight196g197gVirtually identical weight, negligible difference.
Display
Size6.67"6.5"Poco F3 has a slightly larger screen, providing a more immersive viewing experience.
Resolution1080x24001080x2340Both offer similar sharpness; difference is practically unnoticeable.
Pixel Density395 ppi396 ppiBoth offer very similar pixel density - very sharp images.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks for great viewing experience.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzSmooth scrolling and animations on both devices.
Brightness1300 nits1000 nitsPoco F3 is significantly better in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 870 (7 nm)Exynos 1280 (5 nm)Snapdragon 870 offers significantly higher processing power, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score800,216480,688Poco F3 scores significantly higher, indicating much better overall performance.
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G68Adreno 650 offers better graphics performance, beneficial for gaming and graphically demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera Resolution48MP, f/1.7950MP, f/1.8A25 has slightly higher resolution. Poco F3 has a slightly wider aperture which might result in better low-light performance. Sensor models are only provided for the Poco F3
Selfie Camera Resolution20MP, f/2.4513MP, f/2.2Poco F3 captures more detailed selfies. A25 has a wider aperture for potentially better low-light. Sensor models are only provided for the Poco F3
Wide-Angle LensNo8MP, f/2.2A25 offers a wide-angle lens for capturing more in a single shot.
Portrait (Depth)No2MP, f/2.4A25 includes a depth sensor for better portrait shots.
Video Recording4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p up to 960 fps4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p up to 480 fpsBoth offer 4k. The Poco F3 has more slow-motion options.
Camera FeaturesManual Focus, Digital Image StabilizationOptical Stabilization (OIS), Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Digital Image StabilizationA25 has OIS for smoother videos, while Poco F3 has a manual focus option
DxOMark MobileNot Available92 Overall (98 Photo, 94 Video)A25 has a decent camera with tested performance.
Battery
Capacity4520mAh5000mAhA25 has a slightly larger battery that may translate to a bit more usage time.
Charging33W fast charging25W fast chargingPoco F3 charges faster.
Battery TypeLi-PolymerLi-IonBoth are non-removable.
Software & Connectivity
OSAndroid 11, upgradeable to 13Android 14, upgradeable to 18A25 has a newer version of android and a longer support time.
WiFiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)802.11acPoco F3 supports faster Wi-Fi 6, offering better network performance.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.1Bluetooth 5.3A25 has a newer Bluetooth version
GPSGPS (L1+L5), BeiDou (B1, B2), Galileo (E1+E5a), NavICGPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoPoco F3 offers more precise GPS location tracking.
Storage
Internal Storage128 GB or 256 GB128 GB or 256 GBBoth offer similar storage options.
RAM6 GB or 8 GB6 GB or 8 GBBoth come in same memory configurations.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports microSD cards.
Audio
Audio QualityDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersPoco F3 offers better audio fidelity with Hi-Res Audio.
Security
Biometricside-mounted fingerprint sensorside-mounted fingerprint sensorSame security features.
Build
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5Same level of screen protection.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F3 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 870 chipset offers significantly faster processing, better gaming, and smoother multitasking compared to the Exynos 1280. This is a major advantage for users who want a powerful device.
  • Brighter Display: The 1300 nits brightness offers superior visibility in bright outdoor conditions.
  • Faster Charging: 33W charging is faster than the A25's 25W, reducing charging times.
  • Enhanced Audio: Hi-Res Audio support provides a richer listening experience for audiophiles.
  • More Precise GPS: More supported satellite systems mean better location accuracy.
  • Better Wifi: Wi-Fi 6 technology is supported for faster wireless speeds and better network performance.
  • Better Selfie Camera: A higher resolution selfie camera allows for more detailed and better quality self-portraits.

Samsung Galaxy A25 Advantages:

  • Newer Software: The phone launches with Android 14 (upgradable to 18) and provides a better long-term software experience and is guaranteed for at least 4 more versions.
  • Larger Battery: A slightly larger battery capacity might lead to a longer battery life.
  • Wide-Angle & Depth Lens: The inclusion of a wide-angle lens for more versatile photography, along with a dedicated depth sensor for better portraits.
  • OIS: The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) in the main camera is beneficial for taking smooth videos and stable photos, especially in low light.
  • Better Bluetooth Version: Newer bluetooth versions has a better performance.
  • Tested Camera: DxOMark score provides a good objective measure of camera performance.

Trade-offs:

  • The Poco F3 sacrifices a wide-angle camera and OIS for better performance, brightness and audio.
  • The Galaxy A25 prioritizes software updates, slightly better battery, and a more versatile camera system over raw performance.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F3 Ideal User:

  • Gamers: The superior processing power and Adreno 650 GPU make it suitable for demanding games.
  • Power Users: Those who need a fast, responsive phone for multitasking and resource-intensive apps will benefit from the Snapdragon 870.
  • Multimedia Enthusiasts: The Hi-Res audio and brighter display are beneficial for media consumption.
  • Outdoor Users: The 1300 nits brightness is ideal for use in bright environments.

Samsung Galaxy A25 Ideal User:

  • Casual Photographers: The wide-angle and depth lens, OIS, and PDAF provide a more versatile camera system.
  • Users Who Prefer Software Support: Newer Android version and updates are important for some users.
  • Everyday Users: A good balance of features and battery life, suitable for regular daily use.
  • Video Creators: OIS is a major plus for capturing smoother videos.
  • Users Who value consistent performance: Camera performance is objectively measured with DxOMark.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Do you prioritize raw performance for gaming or demanding apps, or is good camera versatility and battery life your focus?
  2. Is long-term software support more important than having the absolute best display and processing power?
  3. How often do you use your phone in bright sunlight, and do you need the additional brightness?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: For a user who is a gamer or needs top-tier performance - Xiaomi Poco F3 is the obvious choice due to its superior processing power and GPU.
  • Scenario 2: For a user who takes a lot of photos, especially with friends or on vacation, and likes shooting videos, the Samsung Galaxy A25 with its wide-angle, portrait lens, and OIS is a better fit.
  • Scenario 3: For someone who uses their phone as a media consumption device or who primarily uses their phone outside in sunny environments, the Xiaomi Poco F3 with a brighter display is the better choice.
  • Scenario 4: For a user who prioritizes future software updates and longer support, the Samsung Galaxy A25 is better.

Final Recommendation

I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F3.

Here's why:

While the Samsung Galaxy A25 offers a newer operating system, a slightly larger battery, and a versatile camera system with OIS, my personal priorities lean towards performance and display quality. The Poco F3's Snapdragon 870 chipset offers a noticeably smoother and faster experience, which would significantly enhance my daily use, especially when multitasking and using demanding apps. The much brighter display of the Poco F3 is also a big plus, as I often use my phone outdoors in direct sunlight. The Hi-Res audio is also appealing for music.

Although the lack of a wide-angle camera and OIS are drawbacks, I believe the performance difference is more critical for my use case. While the A25's camera is very good, I would rather use a phone that is fast in every other category. The Poco F3, although being an older device, still provides a superior experience in areas I value more.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.