Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Oppo Find N3 Flip - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2021 September 8, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 97.55 cm³ 98.38 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.43 "/g
Weight 196 g 198 g
Height 163.7 mm 166.4 mm
Width 76.4 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Arctic White
  • Night Black
  • Deep Ocean Blue
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Cream Gold
  • Misty Pink
  • Sleek Black

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.8 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2520
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.9 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 403 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.60 mAh/in² 92.99 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.33 mAh/cm³ 43.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4520 mAh 4300 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 650 Immortalis-G715 MC11

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Oppo Find N3 FlipPractical Impact
Form FactorStandardFoldableFoldable offers unique portability and multi-screen use, standard is more durable in some cases.
Dimensions163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8 mmOppo Find N3 Flip is slightly taller but similar width/thickness. Minimal difference in hand feel.
Weight196g198gVirtually identical weights, both feel similar in hand.

Display

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Oppo Find N3 FlipPractical Impact
Size6.67"6.8"Oppo offers marginally more screen real estate for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution1080x24001080x2520Oppo has slightly sharper display, though difference is barely noticeable to the naked eye.
PPI395403Both offer sharp visuals; negligible real-world difference.
TechnologyAMOLEDUnspecifiedXiaomi has AMOLED, which generally provides better contrast, deeper blacks, more vibrant colors and better power efficiency when using dark themes. Oppo's tech is unknown.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzSmooth scrolling and animations on both phones.
Brightness1300 nits1600 nitsOppo screen is noticeably brighter, much better for outdoor visibility in direct sunlight.

Performance

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Oppo Find N3 FlipPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 870 (7nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4nm)Oppo has a newer, more powerful chip, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games.
AnTuTu Score800,2161,475,000Oppo benchmarks significantly higher, indicating noticeably better overall performance.
GPUAdreno 650Immortalis-G715 MC11Oppo offers better graphics performance with the newer GPU, ideal for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.

Camera

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Oppo Find N3 FlipPractical Impact
Standard Lens48MP, f/1.79, 1/2", Sony IMX582, 0.8µm50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", Sony IMX890, 1.0µmOppo's larger sensor and pixel size should provide better low-light performance with more detail.
Selfie Lens20MP, f/2.45, 1/3.4", Samsung S5K3T2, 0.8µm32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74", Sony IMX709, 0.8µmOppo should capture more detailed selfies with a larger sensor and higher resolution.
Telephoto LensNone32MP, f/2.0, 1/2.74", Sony IMX709, 0.8µmOppo offers dedicated zoom capabilities. Xiaomi lacks telephoto lens.
Wide Angle + Macro LensNone48MP, f/2.2, 1/2", Sony IMX581, 0.8µmOppo offers ultrawide and macro capabilities; Xiaomi lacks a dedicated ultrawide camera
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p up to 960fps4K@30fps, 1080p up to 240fpsBoth have good video quality but Xiaomi has higher slow motion.
Camera Features4K Video, Digital zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Autofocus, Touch focus, Manual focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer4K Video, Digital zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Ultra stable video, Autofocus, Touch focus, Continuous autofocus, Manual focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, RAW, Night ModeOppo provides more features like 'Ultra stable video', 'continuous autofocus', 'RAW' and 'Night mode' for more professional photography results.

Battery

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Oppo Find N3 FlipPractical Impact
Capacity4520 mAh4300 mAhXiaomi should last a little longer on a single charge due to the marginally larger battery.
Charging33W Fast Charging44W Fast ChargingOppo charges faster, reducing downtime.
FeaturesQC3 + / PD3.0, Non-removableReverse Charging, Non-removableOppo can charge other devices wirelessly.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F3 Advantages

  • Marginally Larger Battery: Potentially slightly longer battery life.
  • Hi-Res Audio: Better audio playback for audiophiles.
  • Slightly Better slow motion video capture 960fps vs 480fps.
  • Lower price point: Generally more affordable, offering good value.
  • More extensive sensor suite: Compass and Ultrasonic proximity virtual sensor

Oppo Find N3 Flip Advantages

  • Foldable Design: More compact when folded, unique form factor and multi screen use cases.
  • Significantly Better Performance: Faster chipset and GPU for smoother experience.
  • Brighter Display: Better outdoor visibility.
  • Superior Camera System: More versatile camera setup with telephoto and ultrawide lens, better sensors and additional features.
  • Faster Charging: Less time plugged into a charger.
  • Reverse Charging: Can charge other devices wirelessly.
  • Newer Software: Ships with a newer version of Android.
  • More Storage: More options for storage up to 512GB.
  • Newer connectivity: WiFi 7

Practical Implications and Trade-offs

  • Poco F3: Great for users who want good performance at a lower price, and are not bothered by a standard non-foldable design. Users sacrifice significant camera quality and performance.
  • Oppo Find N3 Flip: Ideal for users seeking a premium, modern experience with a foldable design, high performance, superior camera quality, brighter display, fast charging and reverse wireless charging. Trade-off is a higher price point and potential fragility due to the foldable nature of the device.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F3

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious user who prioritizes good performance for everyday tasks over premium features.
  • Use Cases:
    • General everyday use, social media, browsing
    • Mobile gaming at moderate graphic settings
    • Users who want a good all around phone for a low price.
  • Price-to-Value: Excellent value for those on a tight budget.

Oppo Find N3 Flip

  • Ideal User: Tech enthusiast willing to invest in a premium device with cutting-edge features and foldable design.
  • Use Cases:
    • High-end mobile gaming
    • Photography/videography
    • Multitasking, content creation
    • Premium experience with a unique foldable form factor
  • Price-to-Value: Higher price, but offers a premium experience with unique features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. Budget: How much are you willing to spend on a new phone?
  2. Features: Do you prioritize performance and camera or a unique foldable design?
  3. Form factor: Do you need the portability and screen space advantages of a foldable phone?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: You want a reliable phone for everyday use and gaming and are on a tight budget. Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco F3
  • Scenario 2: You want a cutting-edge smartphone with the best performance and a versatile camera system for content creation, and have a flexible budget. Recommendation: Oppo Find N3 Flip.
  • Scenario 3: You value the portability of a foldable, and want a premium experience. Recommendation: Oppo Find N3 Flip
  • Scenario 4: You listen to music with wired headphones and value Hi-Res Audio. Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco F3

What I Would Choose and Why

Personally, I would choose the Oppo Find N3 Flip. Although the Xiaomi Poco F3 is a great budget option, the advantages of the Oppo are too compelling to ignore for my own use case.

Here's my reasoning:

  • Superior Performance: As someone who often uses demanding applications and enjoys mobile gaming, the significantly better performance of the Dimensity 9200 chipset is highly valuable.
  • Photography: I enjoy mobile photography, and the additional lenses (Telephoto + Wide Angle/Macro), larger sensors and extra features will provide far greater flexibility and image quality.
  • Foldable Design: The portability of a foldable phone and the ability to have more screen real estate when needed is a feature I appreciate, as I often consume a lot of media. The unique form factor also makes the phone much more interesting for me.
  • Brighter Display: I spend a fair amount of time outdoors, and the brighter display would be a significant improvement over the Poco F3.
  • Future Proofing: The newer chipset, Android version, and connectivity will provide a longer usable lifespan for the device.

While the higher price of the Oppo Find N3 Flip is a consideration, the significant improvements in performance, camera quality, and the unique foldable design make it worth the investment for me. The slightly smaller battery, although a trade-off, is made up by the significantly faster charging speeds. The practical benefits I would derive from these features outweigh the cheaper price of the Poco F3.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.