Smartphone Comparison: Xiaomi Poco F3 vs. Nokia G60
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco F3 | Nokia G60 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 163.7 × 76.4 × 7.8 mm | 166 × 75.9 × 8.6 mm | Poco F3 is slightly shorter and thinner, potentially more comfortable for one-handed use; G60 is taller and thicker. |
| Weight | 196g | 190g | G60 is negligibly lighter, but both are in a similar weight range. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.67" | 6.58" | Both have similarly large displays; the difference in size is barely noticeable. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2408 | Very similar sharpness; negligible difference in pixel density. |
| PPI | 395 | 401 | Practically identical pixel density; both offer sharp visuals. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | AMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency when using dark themes; IPS LCD is more traditional. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations, making the user experience more fluid. |
| Brightness | 1300 nits | 0 nits | Poco F3's significantly higher brightness makes it much better for outdoor visibility in bright sunlight; the Nokia G60's brightness is not specified, so it cannot be compared. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | Snapdragon 870 offers significantly higher processing power, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance compared to the Snapdragon 695. |
| AnTuTu Score | 800,216 | 410,072 | Poco F3 has almost double the benchmark score of G60, reflecting significantly superior performance. |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 619 | Adreno 650 in the Poco F3 provides much stronger graphics processing for gaming and demanding apps than the Adreno 619 in the Nokia G60. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 48MP, f/1.79, 1/2" sensor | 50MP, f/1.8 | Nokia G60 has higher resolution, but Poco F3 has a slightly wider aperture and a larger sensor, which might lead to slightly better low-light performance. |
| Selfie Camera | 20MP, f/2.45, 1/3.4" sensor | 8MP, f/2.0 | Poco F3's selfie camera has much higher resolution, but a narrower aperture. |
| Wide Angle Lens | None | 5MP, f/2.0 | Nokia G60 has an ultra-wide lens for more versatile photos; Poco F3 lacks this feature. |
| Depth Sensor | None | 2MP, f/2.4 | Nokia G60 has a depth sensor for better portrait mode effects; Poco F3 lacks this feature. |
| Video Recording | Up to 4K@30fps | Up to 1080p@30fps | Poco F3 can record in higher resolution, offering better video quality for those who need it. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4520mAh | 4500mAh | Both have similar battery capacities, suggesting comparable battery life for general use. |
| Charging | 33W fast charging | 20W fast charging | Poco F3 charges faster, meaning less time plugged into the wall; Nokia has a slower charging speed. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 13) | Android 12 | Nokia G60 comes with a newer base OS, while the Poco F3 is upgradable to Android 13. |
| Other | |||
| WiFi | WiFi 6, MIMO | WiFi 6 | Both have current WiFi standards; Poco F3 has additional MiMO support. |
| Bluetooth | 5.1, LE, aptX, LDAC | 5.1, LE, aptX, LDAC, EDR | Both have very similar Bluetooth; Nokia has EDR support. |
| SIM | Dual Nano SIM | Dual Nano SIM + eSIM | Nokia G60 offers eSIM support, which can be more convenient for traveling. |
| Storage | 128/256GB, No SD | 64/128GB, No SD | Poco F3 has more storage options, and offers higher maximum capacity; neither supports SD cards. |
| RAM | 6/8GB | 4/6GB | Poco F3 comes with more RAM, allowing for better multitasking and smoother app performance. |
| Audio | Dolby Atmos, Stereo | Basic audio | Poco F3 has enhanced audio with stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos. |
| Security | Side fingerprint sensor | Side fingerprint sensor | Both offer similar basic biometric security. |
| Screen Protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass 5 | Both have the same level of screen protection. |
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Compass, Ultrasonic Proximity Sensor | Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity sensor | Poco F3 has a compass and ultrasonic proximity sensor; Nokia G60 has just a standard proximity sensor. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Xiaomi Poco F3 Advantages:
- Superior Performance: Snapdragon 870 chipset provides significantly better performance for demanding tasks, gaming, and overall responsiveness.
- Enhanced Display: AMOLED panel offers significantly better contrast, richer colors, and deeper blacks compared to the IPS LCD on the Nokia G60.
- Significantly Brighter Display: The Xiaomi Poco F3 boasts a 1300 nit display, which will give superior outdoor visibility; the Nokia G60 has not disclosed its screen brightness.
- Faster Charging: 33W charging allows for quicker battery top-ups.
- Better Audio: Features Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, and stereo speakers for an enhanced audio experience.
- Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: 20MP front camera for better selfies.
- More Storage and RAM Options: Offers more internal storage and RAM, catering to users who need more memory.
Nokia G60 Advantages:
- Newer Base OS: Comes with Android 12, which is newer than Poco F3's base Android 11.
- Ultra-Wide Lens: Offers more flexibility in photography with a 5MP ultra-wide lens.
- Depth Sensor: Includes a dedicated depth sensor for improved portrait photography.
- eSIM Support: Easier to switch between carriers when travelling.
- More Efficient Chip: The Snapdragon 695 chipset in the Nokia G60 is more energy-efficient, potentially leading to better battery life.
Trade-offs:
- Poco F3: Trades better camera versatility (no ultra-wide or depth sensor) and a slightly older base OS for significantly better performance and display quality.
- Nokia G60: Trades high-end performance and display for slightly more camera versatility and a newer base OS.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Xiaomi Poco F3 Ideal Users:
- Gamers: Demanding mobile games will perform much better due to the powerful Snapdragon 870 chip and Adreno 650 GPU.
- Power Users: Users who frequently multitask or use demanding applications will benefit from the faster processor and more RAM.
- Media Consumers: The AMOLED screen's vibrant colors and high contrast, coupled with Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers, make it great for watching videos.
- Users Needing Bright Outdoor Visibility: Those who frequently use their phones in bright conditions will benefit from the much higher display brightness of the Poco F3.
Nokia G60 Ideal Users:
- Casual Photographers: The ultra-wide and depth sensors offer a more versatile camera experience for casual photography.
- Travelers: eSIM support is convenient for switching between carriers in different locations.
- Users Prioritizing Battery Efficiency: The Snapdragon 695 is more energy-efficient, potentially leading to better battery life.
- Users wanting an ultra-wide camera: This is a significant advantage over the Poco F3.
- Budget Conscious Users: Those who do not need high-end performance and prioritize a balanced phone.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is gaming and raw performance? If performance is a top priority, the Poco F3 is the clear winner.
- Do you need an ultra-wide camera or are you content with a single lens? If you prioritize versatility in photography, the Nokia G60 has the edge with the ultra-wide lens.
- Is a brighter outdoor screen important to you? If so, the Poco F3 is far superior.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- For high-performance usage (gaming, multitasking): Choose the Xiaomi Poco F3.
- For casual use with greater camera versatility and eSIM support: Choose the Nokia G60.
- For media consumption and best display: Choose the Xiaomi Poco F3.
- For consistent, long-lasting battery: Choose the Nokia G60 due to the power-efficient chip.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F3. Although the Nokia G60 offers a more versatile camera setup and a slightly newer Android OS out of the box, the massive performance advantage of the Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F3 and the vastly superior AMOLED display make it the far more compelling option for me. I also value the enhanced audio experience offered by the Poco F3. While the lack of an ultra-wide lens is a drawback, the raw speed, display quality, and brighter screen of the Poco F3 are more beneficial for my typical use cases, which includes a mix of gaming, video consumption, and everyday multitasking. Additionally, if I am using my phone outdoors, the superior brightness of the Xiaomi Poco F3's screen will make it the much better choice.
