1. Specifications Comparison
Here's a detailed comparison of the Xiaomi Poco F3 and Huawei Mate 50 Pro, focusing on practical implications:
Design
Feature | Xiaomi Poco F3 | Huawei Mate 50 Pro | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm | 162.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm | Poco F3 is slightly taller, Mate 50 Pro is slightly thicker. Minimal practical difference in hand feel. |
Weight | 196g | 205g | Poco F3 is a bit lighter, potentially more comfortable for prolonged use. |
Display
Feature | Xiaomi Poco F3 | Huawei Mate 50 Pro | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Size | 6.67" | 6.74" | Negligible difference, both are large screens suitable for media consumption. |
Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1212x2616 | Mate 50 Pro has a noticeably sharper display with more detail, especially for text and high-resolution images. |
PPI | 395 | 428 | Mate 50 Pro offers a slightly crisper viewing experience, but both are sharp enough for everyday use. |
Technology | AMOLED | OLED | Similar technologies, both deliver vibrant colors and deep blacks. Minor differences in color accuracy and vibrancy might be present. |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations, making the user interface and games feel more responsive. |
Brightness | 1300 nits | 0 nits | Poco F3 is much better suited for outdoor viewing in bright sunlight, thanks to significantly higher brightness. The brightness of Mate 50 Pro is unknown. |
Performance
Feature | Xiaomi Poco F3 | Huawei Mate 50 Pro | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Chipset | Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm) | Mate 50 Pro offers faster processing and better efficiency for demanding tasks, though it lacks 5G connectivity. Poco F3 still offers very good performance. |
Antutu Score | 800,216 | 1,022,043 | Mate 50 Pro has a clear performance advantage, leading to faster app loading and smoother multitasking. |
GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 730 | Mate 50 Pro provides superior graphics performance, better for gaming and graphically intensive applications. |
Camera
Feature | Xiaomi Poco F3 | Huawei Mate 50 Pro | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Main Camera | 48MP, f/1.79, 1/2", Sony IMX582 | 50MP, f/1.4, 1/1.56", Sony IMX766 | Mate 50 Pro captures more light with a wider aperture and larger sensor, resulting in better low-light performance and potentially more detailed photos. |
Selfie Camera | 20MP, f/2.45, 1/3.4", Samsung S5K3T2 | 13MP, f/2.4 | Poco F3 has a higher resolution front camera, but the Mate 50 Pro with its slightly wider aperture might perform better in low light. Note missing sensor details for Mate 50 Pro selfie. |
Telephoto | None | 64MP, f/3.5, 1/2", Omnivision OV64B | Mate 50 Pro offers optical zoom capabilities, enabling clear, detailed photos at a distance. Poco F3 lacks this feature. |
Wide Angle | None | 12MP, f/2.2, Sony IMX688 | Mate 50 Pro can capture a wider field of view, ideal for landscapes or group photos. Poco F3 lacks this feature. |
Video | Up to 4K@30fps, EIS | Up to 4K@60fps, HDR, EIS | Mate 50 Pro can record 4K video at 60fps and has HDR which increases dynamic range, resulting in better-looking videos. |
DxOMark Score | Not tested | Mobile: 149, Selfie: 145 | Mate 50 Pro has superior camera performance based on DxOMark score. |
Battery
Feature | Xiaomi Poco F3 | Huawei Mate 50 Pro | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Capacity | 4520mAh | 4700mAh | Both have similar battery capacity, meaning similar battery life in normal usage. |
Charging | 33W fast charging | 66W fast charging | Mate 50 Pro charges much faster, reducing the time you need to keep the device plugged in. |
Features | QC3+/PD3.0 | 50W wireless, 7.5W reverse | Mate 50 Pro offers faster wired charging and the convenience of wireless and reverse wireless charging, which are not present in Poco F3. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Xiaomi Poco F3 Advantages:
- Brighter Display: Significantly better visibility in bright sunlight.
- 5G Connectivity: Access to faster 5G networks.
- More Bluetooth Features: Includes A2DP, LE, and APT-x in addition to LDAC, SBC, and AAC for audio connectivity.
- Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio: Enhanced audio experience with spatial audio features.
- Lower starting price: Usually available at a lower price point than the Huawei Mate 50 Pro.
Huawei Mate 50 Pro Advantages:
- Superior Main Camera: Better low-light performance, wider aperture, and larger sensor for more detailed photos.
- Telephoto and Wide-Angle Lenses: Enhanced photography versatility with optical zoom and ultra-wide shots.
- Faster Processor: Improved performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
- Higher Resolution Display: Sharper screen with more detail.
- Faster Charging and Wireless Charging: Significantly faster charging times and convenient wireless charging options, including reverse wireless.
- Better Video Recording: Higher frame rates and HDR capabilities for video capture
- More Advanced Camera Features: Optical image stabilization, RAW capture, and night mode for more sophisticated photo and video taking.
- More comprehensive GPS: Increased location accuracy with multi-satellite system support.
- More Environmental Sensors: Barometer for altitude measurement.
Trade-offs:
- Poco F3: Compromises on camera versatility and high-end performance for a more affordable price, and lacks wireless charging.
- Mate 50 Pro: More expensive, and lacks 5G connectivity, has an unknown brightness.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Xiaomi Poco F3 Ideal User:
- Budget-conscious buyers: Those looking for great performance at a lower price.
- Gamers: Benefit from the powerful chipset, smooth display, and good audio.
- Outdoor Users: Value the bright display for easy visibility under sunlight.
- Users focused on audio quality: Enjoy the enhanced audio experience with Dolby Atmos and Hi-Res audio.
Use Cases:
- Gaming and streaming media.
- Everyday use and multitasking.
- Social media and light content creation.
- Users who require a bright display for outdoor readability.
Huawei Mate 50 Pro Ideal User:
- Photography Enthusiasts: Those who prioritize camera quality and versatility.
- Power Users: Demanding tasks, and high-end gaming.
- Users seeking top-tier experience: Want the best possible display, performance, and features, especially in camera quality.
- Users needing fast and convenient charging: Wireless charging and faster wired charging.
Use Cases:
- Professional-level photography and videography.
- Demanding applications and multitasking.
- Content creation and editing.
- Frequent users of navigation and location-based apps.
- Those who require quick charging and wireless capabilities.
4. Decision Framework
Here are three questions buyers should ask themselves:
How important is camera quality and versatility to me?
- If it's a top priority, the Mate 50 Pro is the better choice.
- If the camera is not your priority, the Poco F3 is adequate.
How much am I willing to spend?
- If budget is a major constraint, the Poco F3 is the more affordable option.
- If you can afford to spend more, the Mate 50 Pro offers more advanced features.
Do I need 5G or fast charging?
- If 5G is crucial, Poco F3 is the only option, but if not, Mate 50 Pro offers significantly faster charging.
- If wireless charging is important, Mate 50 Pro is a must.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Casual User on a Budget: If you need a reliable phone for everyday use and occasional gaming, the Xiaomi Poco F3 is the better value pick.
- Scenario 2: Photography Enthusiast: If you need superior camera quality, versatility, and low-light performance, the Huawei Mate 50 Pro is the clear winner.
- Scenario 3: Mobile Gamer: If you need the best gaming performance and graphics, the Huawei Mate 50 Pro is the better option, while still being a good experience on Poco F3.
- Scenario 4: User who uses the phone outdoors a lot: If you require a phone that is easy to see in bright sunlight, Xiaomi Poco F3 is your best bet.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would lean towards the Huawei Mate 50 Pro. While the Xiaomi Poco F3 offers excellent value for its price, the Mate 50 Pro excels in areas that are crucial to me, such as camera performance and versatility, faster processing power, and the convenience of wireless charging. Although the lack of 5G is a downside, the camera quality of the Mate 50 Pro, along with the improved screen, would make my everyday experience noticeably better.