Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Huawei Mate 50 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2021 September 28, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 97.55 cm³ 104.03 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.29 "/g
Weight 196 g 205 g
Height 163.7 mm 162.1 mm
Width 76.4 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Arctic White
  • Night Black
  • Deep Ocean Blue
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Purple
  • Orange

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1212 x 2616
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.9 % 91.3 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 428 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.60 mAh/in² 103.46 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.33 mAh/cm³ 45.18 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4520 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android N/A
Initial OS Version 11 N/A
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Xiaomi Poco F3 and Huawei Mate 50 Pro, focusing on practical implications:

Design

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Huawei Mate 50 ProPractical Impact
Dimensions163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm162.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mmPoco F3 is slightly taller, Mate 50 Pro is slightly thicker. Minimal practical difference in hand feel.
Weight196g205gPoco F3 is a bit lighter, potentially more comfortable for prolonged use.

Display

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Huawei Mate 50 ProPractical Impact
Size6.67"6.74"Negligible difference, both are large screens suitable for media consumption.
Resolution1080x24001212x2616Mate 50 Pro has a noticeably sharper display with more detail, especially for text and high-resolution images.
PPI395428Mate 50 Pro offers a slightly crisper viewing experience, but both are sharp enough for everyday use.
TechnologyAMOLEDOLEDSimilar technologies, both deliver vibrant colors and deep blacks. Minor differences in color accuracy and vibrancy might be present.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations, making the user interface and games feel more responsive.
Brightness1300 nits0 nitsPoco F3 is much better suited for outdoor viewing in bright sunlight, thanks to significantly higher brightness. The brightness of Mate 50 Pro is unknown.

Performance

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Huawei Mate 50 ProPractical Impact
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm)Mate 50 Pro offers faster processing and better efficiency for demanding tasks, though it lacks 5G connectivity. Poco F3 still offers very good performance.
Antutu Score800,2161,022,043Mate 50 Pro has a clear performance advantage, leading to faster app loading and smoother multitasking.
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 730Mate 50 Pro provides superior graphics performance, better for gaming and graphically intensive applications.

Camera

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Huawei Mate 50 ProPractical Impact
Main Camera48MP, f/1.79, 1/2", Sony IMX58250MP, f/1.4, 1/1.56", Sony IMX766Mate 50 Pro captures more light with a wider aperture and larger sensor, resulting in better low-light performance and potentially more detailed photos.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.45, 1/3.4", Samsung S5K3T213MP, f/2.4Poco F3 has a higher resolution front camera, but the Mate 50 Pro with its slightly wider aperture might perform better in low light. Note missing sensor details for Mate 50 Pro selfie.
TelephotoNone64MP, f/3.5, 1/2", Omnivision OV64BMate 50 Pro offers optical zoom capabilities, enabling clear, detailed photos at a distance. Poco F3 lacks this feature.
Wide AngleNone12MP, f/2.2, Sony IMX688Mate 50 Pro can capture a wider field of view, ideal for landscapes or group photos. Poco F3 lacks this feature.
VideoUp to 4K@30fps, EISUp to 4K@60fps, HDR, EISMate 50 Pro can record 4K video at 60fps and has HDR which increases dynamic range, resulting in better-looking videos.
DxOMark ScoreNot testedMobile: 149, Selfie: 145Mate 50 Pro has superior camera performance based on DxOMark score.

Battery

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Huawei Mate 50 ProPractical Impact
Capacity4520mAh4700mAhBoth have similar battery capacity, meaning similar battery life in normal usage.
Charging33W fast charging66W fast chargingMate 50 Pro charges much faster, reducing the time you need to keep the device plugged in.
FeaturesQC3+/PD3.050W wireless, 7.5W reverseMate 50 Pro offers faster wired charging and the convenience of wireless and reverse wireless charging, which are not present in Poco F3.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F3 Advantages:

  • Brighter Display: Significantly better visibility in bright sunlight.
  • 5G Connectivity: Access to faster 5G networks.
  • More Bluetooth Features: Includes A2DP, LE, and APT-x in addition to LDAC, SBC, and AAC for audio connectivity.
  • Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio: Enhanced audio experience with spatial audio features.
  • Lower starting price: Usually available at a lower price point than the Huawei Mate 50 Pro.

Huawei Mate 50 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Main Camera: Better low-light performance, wider aperture, and larger sensor for more detailed photos.
  • Telephoto and Wide-Angle Lenses: Enhanced photography versatility with optical zoom and ultra-wide shots.
  • Faster Processor: Improved performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher Resolution Display: Sharper screen with more detail.
  • Faster Charging and Wireless Charging: Significantly faster charging times and convenient wireless charging options, including reverse wireless.
  • Better Video Recording: Higher frame rates and HDR capabilities for video capture
  • More Advanced Camera Features: Optical image stabilization, RAW capture, and night mode for more sophisticated photo and video taking.
  • More comprehensive GPS: Increased location accuracy with multi-satellite system support.
  • More Environmental Sensors: Barometer for altitude measurement.

Trade-offs:

  • Poco F3: Compromises on camera versatility and high-end performance for a more affordable price, and lacks wireless charging.
  • Mate 50 Pro: More expensive, and lacks 5G connectivity, has an unknown brightness.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F3 Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious buyers: Those looking for great performance at a lower price.
  • Gamers: Benefit from the powerful chipset, smooth display, and good audio.
  • Outdoor Users: Value the bright display for easy visibility under sunlight.
  • Users focused on audio quality: Enjoy the enhanced audio experience with Dolby Atmos and Hi-Res audio.

Use Cases:

  • Gaming and streaming media.
  • Everyday use and multitasking.
  • Social media and light content creation.
  • Users who require a bright display for outdoor readability.

Huawei Mate 50 Pro Ideal User:

  • Photography Enthusiasts: Those who prioritize camera quality and versatility.
  • Power Users: Demanding tasks, and high-end gaming.
  • Users seeking top-tier experience: Want the best possible display, performance, and features, especially in camera quality.
  • Users needing fast and convenient charging: Wireless charging and faster wired charging.

Use Cases:

  • Professional-level photography and videography.
  • Demanding applications and multitasking.
  • Content creation and editing.
  • Frequent users of navigation and location-based apps.
  • Those who require quick charging and wireless capabilities.

4. Decision Framework

Here are three questions buyers should ask themselves:

  1. How important is camera quality and versatility to me?

    • If it's a top priority, the Mate 50 Pro is the better choice.
    • If the camera is not your priority, the Poco F3 is adequate.
  2. How much am I willing to spend?

    • If budget is a major constraint, the Poco F3 is the more affordable option.
    • If you can afford to spend more, the Mate 50 Pro offers more advanced features.
  3. Do I need 5G or fast charging?

    • If 5G is crucial, Poco F3 is the only option, but if not, Mate 50 Pro offers significantly faster charging.
    • If wireless charging is important, Mate 50 Pro is a must.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Casual User on a Budget: If you need a reliable phone for everyday use and occasional gaming, the Xiaomi Poco F3 is the better value pick.
  • Scenario 2: Photography Enthusiast: If you need superior camera quality, versatility, and low-light performance, the Huawei Mate 50 Pro is the clear winner.
  • Scenario 3: Mobile Gamer: If you need the best gaming performance and graphics, the Huawei Mate 50 Pro is the better option, while still being a good experience on Poco F3.
  • Scenario 4: User who uses the phone outdoors a lot: If you require a phone that is easy to see in bright sunlight, Xiaomi Poco F3 is your best bet.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would lean towards the Huawei Mate 50 Pro. While the Xiaomi Poco F3 offers excellent value for its price, the Mate 50 Pro excels in areas that are crucial to me, such as camera performance and versatility, faster processing power, and the convenience of wireless charging. Although the lack of 5G is a downside, the camera quality of the Mate 50 Pro, along with the improved screen, would make my everyday experience noticeably better.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.