Xiaomi Poco F3 vs HTC U23 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2021 May 18, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 97.55 cm³ 114.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.27 "/g
Weight 196 g 205 g
Height 163.7 mm 166.6 mm
Width 76.4 mm 77.1 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Arctic White
  • Night Black
  • Deep Ocean Blue
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Snow White
  • Coffee Black

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.9 % 84.4 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.60 mAh/in² 102.47 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.33 mAh/cm³ 40.24 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4520 mAh 4600 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Xiaomi Poco F3 vs. HTC U23 Pro

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3HTC U23 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.7 × 76.4 × 7.8 mm166.6 × 77.1 × 8.9 mmHTC U23 Pro is slightly taller and thicker, which may make it less pocketable and affect one-handed use.
Weight196g205gXiaomi Poco F3 is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.67"6.7"Negligible size difference; both offer a large screen for immersive viewing.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical sharpness; both provide a crisp visual experience.
PPI395393Practically indistinguishable in terms of pixel density, very sharp visuals.
TechnologyAMOLEDOLEDBoth offer excellent color reproduction and deep blacks; differences are minor in practical use.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzSmooth scrolling and animations on both; no practical difference.
Brightness1300 nits0 nitsXiaomi Poco F3 is significantly brighter, making it more usable in direct sunlight; the HTC U23 Pro's brightness data is missing, creating a major question mark.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 (7nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)Xiaomi Poco F3’s older chip offers better performance, faster app loading, and smoother gaming compared to the more modern but less performant HTC chip.
AnTuTu Score800,216699,600Xiaomi Poco F3 scores significantly higher indicating better overall performance in benchmarks and tasks.
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 644Xiaomi Poco F3 has a more powerful GPU, resulting in better gaming performance and graphics-intensive tasks.
Battery
Capacity4520mAh4600mAhSimilar capacity; both should offer comparable battery life for typical usage.
Charging33W Fast Charging30W Fast ChargingXiaomi Poco F3 has slightly faster wired charging.
FeaturesQC3+/PD3.015W Wireless Charging, 5W ReverseHTC U23 Pro adds convenience with wireless charging and reverse wireless charging; Xiaomi Poco F3 supports fast charging protocols.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.79, 1/2"108MP, f/1.7HTC U23 Pro has a significantly higher resolution and slightly wider aperture main sensor; potential for more detail and better low-light performance (Note: specific sensor models missing for HTC).
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.45, 1/3.4"32MP, f/2.45HTC U23 Pro has a higher resolution selfie camera; potentially better detail in selfies.
Wide Angle LensN/A8MP, f/2.4HTC U23 Pro includes an 8MP wide-angle lens for capturing expansive scenes; Xiaomi Poco F3 lacks a wide-angle lens.
Portrait LensN/A5MP, f/2.2HTC U23 Pro has a dedicated depth sensor for improved portrait mode. Xiaomi Poco F3 does not have a depth sensor.
Macro LensN/A2MP, f/2.4HTC U23 Pro offers a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography. Xiaomi Poco F3 does not have a macro lens.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@960fps with EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps with EISBoth support 4K recording. Xiaomi Poco F3 offers 1080p slow motion up to 960fps.
Video FeaturesEISEIS, OISHTC U23 Pro's OIS is more effective in reducing camera shake compared to digital stabilization.
FeaturesTriple camera, Manual focus, Continuous shootingQuadruple camera, OIS, PDAFHTC U23 Pro offers Quad camera, OIS for better image stabilization, and PDAF for faster focusing. Xiaomi Poco F3 offers manual focus and continuous shooting.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (Upgradable to 13)Android 13HTC U23 Pro ships with a newer OS version.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6, MIMOWi-Fi 6Both offer Wi-Fi 6, Xiaomi Poco F3 features MIMO for improved signal stability and speed.
Bluetooth5.1, APT-x, LDAC, SBC, AAC5.2HTC U23 Pro has a newer version of Bluetooth; Xiaomi Poco F3 offers more audio codecs.
GPSL1+L5, BeiDou (B1,B2), NavICStandard GPSXiaomi Poco F3 provides more precise positioning with support for L5 band and other satellite systems.
Storage & RAM
Internal Storage128/256 GB256 GBBoth offer 256GB as maximum; Xiaomi Poco F3 comes with 128 GB variant. Neither phone provides expandable storage.
RAM6/8 GB8/12 GBHTC U23 Pro can have up to 12 GB of RAM, allowing smoother multitasking.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Hi-Res, Stereo SpeakersBasicXiaomi Poco F3 offers superior audio quality through stereo speakers and audio enhancements.
Security
FingerprintSide-mountedSide-mountedSimilar side-mounted fingerprint scanner, convenient for unlocking.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass VictusHTC U23 Pro offers superior screen protection against scratches and impacts.
SensorsFingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic proximityFingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, ProximityXiaomi Poco F3 has an ultrasonic proximity sensor while HTC U23 Pro uses the standard proximity sensor.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F3 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 870 chipset and Adreno 650 GPU offer significantly better performance in benchmarks and real-world usage, including smoother gaming and faster app loading.
  • Brighter Display: The 1300 nits display is significantly brighter making it much better for outdoor visibility in sunlight.
  • Enhanced Audio: Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res audio, and stereo speakers provide a far superior audio experience for media consumption.
  • Better Positioning: More precise positioning with L1+L5 band and other satellite system support.

HTC U23 Pro Advantages:

  • Newer Operating System: Ships with Android 13 out of the box, potentially providing more timely updates and features.
  • Versatile Camera System: Includes wide-angle, macro, and depth sensors, offering greater flexibility in photography.
  • Wireless Charging: Supports 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wireless charging, adding convenience.
  • Optical Image Stabilization (OIS): OIS provides superior video and image stabilization, particularly beneficial in low-light conditions.
  • Superior Screen Protection: The Gorilla Glass Victus provides a much stronger screen.

Trade-offs:

  • Xiaomi Poco F3: Lacks the camera versatility, OIS and wireless charging features of the HTC U23 Pro and uses an older OS out of the box.
  • HTC U23 Pro: Sacrifices some performance and brightness for a newer operating system, a more versatile camera setup, and wireless charging capabilities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F3 Ideal User:

  • Gamers: The powerful chipset and GPU provide a superior gaming experience.
  • Power Users: Those who prioritize performance and speed in daily tasks.
  • Media Consumers: Users who value high-quality audio and a bright display for watching videos and listening to music.
  • Value-conscious buyers: Users who want flagship-level performance at a lower price point.
  • Outdoor users: User who need a bright screen for outdoor use in daylight.

Use Cases:

  • Playing demanding mobile games at high frame rates.
  • Multitasking between resource-intensive applications.
  • Enjoying multimedia content with excellent audio and visuals.
  • Navigating using precise GPS.

HTC U23 Pro Ideal User:

  • Photography Enthusiasts: Those who value versatile camera systems with wide-angle, macro, and depth lenses, and OIS.
  • Users focused on Convenience: People who would appreciate wireless charging capabilities.
  • Users who want a newer OS: Individuals who want the latest version of Android with potentially more support for future updates.
  • Users who are likely to drop their phone: A much tougher screen.

Use Cases:

  • Capturing a wide range of photos with different perspectives.
  • Wireless charging on the go.
  • Taking advantage of the latest software features.
  • Taking photos or videos with better image stabilization.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Do you prioritize performance or camera versatility? If performance is paramount, choose the Poco F3. If camera features matter most, consider the HTC U23 Pro.
  2. Is wireless charging and OIS important to you? If so, the HTC U23 Pro is the clear winner.
  3. What are your brightness needs? If you are often in bright sunlight, the Xiaomi Poco F3 is likely to be a much better choice.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Gaming Enthusiast - Choose the Xiaomi Poco F3 for its superior gaming performance, higher refresh rate, and enhanced audio experience.
  • Scenario 2: Photography Lover - Choose the HTC U23 Pro for its versatile quad-camera setup, OIS, and ability to take a wider variety of photos.
  • Scenario 3: Everyday User - The Xiaomi Poco F3 is still the better pick for its much better brightness and overall better performance, unless wireless charging is a must-have.

My Choice

Given the information available, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F3.

Here's why:

  • Performance: As a power user, I prioritize raw performance and speed. The Snapdragon 870 chipset in the Poco F3 offers a noticeable advantage in everyday usage and gaming, which is a big win for me. The HTC U23 Pro's chipset is newer but it scores lower, indicating it is not as powerful.
  • Brightness: The lack of brightness specification for the HTC U23 Pro is concerning. The Poco F3's 1300 nits brightness is a major advantage, particularly outdoors.
  • Audio Quality: I consume a lot of media, and the Dolby Atmos stereo speakers in the Poco F3 would provide a superior audio experience over the basic audio features of the HTC.
  • Value: The Poco F3 provides higher end performance for the price.

While the HTC U23 Pro has its merits with wireless charging, newer OS and OIS, the Poco F3's combination of powerful performance, higher brightness and significantly better audio quality makes it a more compelling choice for my specific use case and the lack of brightness spec on the HTC is concerning.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.