Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2021 September 20, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 97.55 cm³ 104.99 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.04 "/g
Weight 196 g 227 g
Height 163.7 mm 163 mm
Width 76.4 mm 77.6 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Arctic White
  • Night Black
  • Deep Ocean Blue
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Black Titanium
  • White Titanium
  • Natural Titanium
  • Desert Titanium

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1320 x 2868
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.9 % 92.2 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 2000 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.60 mAh/in² 98.40 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.33 mAh/cm³ 44.63 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4520 mAh 4685 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Apple A18 Pro (3 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Hexa-core (2x4.05 GHz + 4x2.42 GHz)
GPU Adreno 650 Apple GPU (6-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, Gen 2, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 11 18
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco F3Apple iPhone 16 Pro MaxPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.7 × 76.4 × 7.8 mm163 × 77.6 × 8.3 mmiPhone slightly wider and thicker; Poco F3 is more compact
Weight196g227gPoco F3 significantly lighter, easier for one-handed use
Display
Size6.67"6.9"iPhone has a slightly larger screen for more immersive media consumption
Resolution1080x24001320x2868iPhone has a significantly sharper display, with better clarity for text and images
Pixel Density395 PPI460 PPIiPhone display looks noticeably sharper; finer details are more visible
TechnologyAMOLEDOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth provide smooth scrolling and animations
Brightness1300 nits2000 nitsiPhone offers far superior outdoor visibility, especially in direct sunlight
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 5G (7nm)Apple A18 Pro (3nm)iPhone offers much faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance
AnTuTu Score800,2161,947,255iPhone has a significantly higher performance, suitable for demanding tasks and future-proofing
GPUAdreno 650Apple GPU (6-core graphics)iPhone GPU provides superior graphics performance, essential for high-end gaming and graphics-intensive apps
Camera
Standard Camera48MP, f/1.79, 1/2", 0.8µm48MP, f/1.78, 1/1.3", 1.22µmiPhone has a larger sensor capturing more light for better low-light photos, larger pixels for less noise, wider aperture for shallow depth of field
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.45, 1/3.4", 0.8µm12MP, f/1.9, Unknown µmiPhone has a wider aperture for better low-light selfies, but lower resolution, missing pixel size for analysis
Telephoto LensNot Available12MP, f/2.8, 1.12µmiPhone offers optical zoom capabilities for more detailed images of distant subjects
Wide + MacroNot Available48MP, f/2.2, 1/2.55", 0.7µmiPhone offers wide-angle shots and macro capabilities for close-up photography
ToF 3D SensorNot Available0.8MP, Unknown µmiPhone has depth-sensing capabilities, enhancing features like portrait mode
Video RecordingUp to 4K@60fps, EIS, slow motion 960fpsUp to 4K@120fps HDR, Stereo sound, slow-motion 240fpsBoth phones capture high quality video, iPhone has better quality with HDR, stero sound and less slow motion capability, no EIS on the iPhone
DXOMark (Mobile)Not Available157 (Photo 157, Video 159)iPhone has a confirmed excellent camera performance
DXOMark (Selfie)Not Available151 (Photo 149, Video 155)iPhone has a confirmed excellent selfie camera performance
Camera FeaturesBasic featuresAdvanced features including Pro Mode, RAW and Night ModeiPhone has extensive photography features, offering more creative control and higher quality
Battery
Capacity4520mAh4685mAhSimilar battery capacities, implying comparable usage times
Charging33W fast charging, Li-Polymer25W fast charging, Li-IonPoco F3 charges slightly faster
FeaturesSupports QC3 + / PD3.025W Wireless ChargingiPhone supports wireless charging for convenience, Poco F3 supports fast charging protocols
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 13)iOS 18Different ecosystems; Android offers more customization, while iOS is known for its seamless performance and ecosystem
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7iPhone provides faster Wi-Fi speeds and better network performance
BluetoothBluetooth 5.1Bluetooth 5.3iPhone has a more efficient Bluetooth connection
GPSMultiple systemsMultiple systems incl. QZSSiPhone offers potentially greater location accuracy in some regions
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIM + eSIMiPhone offers more flexibility with eSIM, Poco F3 uses two physical SIM cards
Storage
Internal128/256GB256/512/1024GBiPhone has more storage capacity for larger media libraries and apps; No expandable storage on both models
RAM6/8GB8GBBoth offer sufficient RAM for multitasking; iPhone offers good for multitasking and gaming
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Hi-Res AudioDolby Atmos, Noise cancellation miciPhone has better microphone for calls, Poco F3 offers Hi-Res Audio for higher quality audio playback
Security
Featuresside-mounted fingerprint sensorFace ID and basic security featuresPoco F3 uses fingerprint, iPhone uses face unlock; fingerprint unlock might be faster than face unlock
Build Quality
ProtectionGorilla Glass 5UnknownPoco F3 has known screen protection; iPhone's protection level is not stated
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic proximity virtualProximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, BarometeriPhone has additional environmental sensors, Poco F3 has fingerprint sensor and virtual proximity sensor

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F3 Advantages:

  • Lighter Design: Significantly lighter making it more comfortable for extended use.
  • Faster Charging: 33W charging is faster than iPhone's 25W.
  • Hi-Res Audio: Offers better audio playback for audiophiles.
  • More SIM Options: Two physical SIM slots offer more flexibility for users not reliant on eSIM.
  • Fingerprint Sensor: Offers a physical fingerprint sensor, which some prefer.
  • Affordable: Likely to be much more budget-friendly, offering high value for its price.

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: A18 Pro chipset is significantly faster and more efficient, offering a much smoother and faster experience.
  • Sharper, Brighter Display: Higher resolution and brightness offer better visuals, especially outdoors.
  • Advanced Camera System: Offers a telephoto lens, wide-angle lens, and a larger main sensor for superior photo and video quality, including RAW and night mode.
  • ToF 3D sensor: Improves photo quality and facial recognition
  • Video Quality: Offers higher quality HDR recording with stereo sound
  • Better Wi-Fi: Supports newer Wi-Fi 7 standard for faster and more reliable internet connectivity.
  • eSIM Support: Offers flexibility for digital carrier switching
  • Advanced Audio Features: Noise cancellation microphone for better quality
  • Superior DXOMark scores: Offers a confirmed excellent camera performance in both selfie and main cameras
  • Software Ecosystem: iOS offers seamless integration across devices, long-term software support, and better privacy.

Trade-offs:

  • Poco F3: Lacks the superior camera, performance and display of the iPhone and is older tech.
  • iPhone 16 Pro Max: Heavier, more expensive, and relies on a face unlock instead of a fingerprint sensor for authentication.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco F3 - Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious Users: Those seeking good performance at a lower price point
  • Gamers: Provides a 120Hz refresh rate and strong performance
  • Multimedia Consumers: Enjoy consuming media with a great screen.
  • Users preferring Physical SIMs: Those who want Dual Nano SIM without having to rely on eSIM.
  • Users preferring Fingerprint: Those who prefer physical fingerprint scanners
  • Audiophiles: Those who value higher audio quality

Specific Use Cases for Poco F3:

  • Mobile gaming and smooth multitasking.
  • Watching movies and streaming videos.
  • Everyday communication and social media.
  • Users who want high-quality audio playback

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max - Ideal User:

  • Professional Photographers/Videographers: Those needing the best mobile camera with advanced features and highest quality photo/video.
  • Performance Enthusiasts: Those who need the best performance, future-proofing.
  • Apple Ecosystem Users: Those invested in the Apple ecosystem who need the seamless experience with other Apple products.
  • Users Preferring Face Unlock: Those who prefer face unlock over fingerprint scanners.
  • Users needing the Best Wi-Fi: Those who want the latest Wi-Fi connection speeds
  • Users needing lots of storage: Those who want up to 1TB storage

Specific Use Cases for iPhone 16 Pro Max:

  • Professional photography and videography, especially in low light.
  • Demanding mobile gaming and resource-intensive tasks.
  • Seamless integration with Apple's ecosystem (i.e., iPads, Macbooks, Apple Watches).
  • Users who prefer iOS and its ecosystem.
  • Users who need the most advanced cellular capabilities
  • Users who need large internal storage

Price-to-Value:

  • Poco F3: Offers excellent value for its price point.
  • iPhone 16 Pro Max: Premium price tag, but its features and ecosystem justify the cost for the right user.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The iPhone is significantly more expensive, while the Poco offers great value at a lower price point.
  2. What are your camera priorities? If you need a versatile, high-end camera system, the iPhone is the clear choice.
  3. Do you prefer performance or price? The iPhone excels in performance, while the Poco offers a balance of price and good capabilities.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Tight Budget, Good Performance: If you're on a budget but still want a capable phone for gaming and multimedia, the Xiaomi Poco F3 is a good option.
  • Scenario 2: Professional Media Creator: If you need a top-tier camera system and the best possible performance, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max is the better option.
  • Scenario 3: Ecosystem Integration: If you are invested in the Apple ecosystem and need a seamless experience, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max is better.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max, despite its higher cost. My reasons are as follows:

  • Ecosystem & Future-proofing: I use other Apple products and value the seamless integration. I also prioritize a phone that will remain powerful and feature-rich for several years. The A18 Pro chipset and iOS updates will provide longevity.
  • Superior Camera System: As someone who values mobile photography, the iPhone 16 Pro Max's camera, with its various lenses, advanced sensors and photo features, offers a much higher level of creative potential and image quality.
  • Best Wi-Fi: I also prioritize having the best internet connection speed available.
  • No Trade-off on Performance: I don't want to make a trade-off between price and performance if I can avoid it.
  • Large Storage Capacity: I require a lot of storage for high-quality photos and videos.

While I recognize the value proposition of the Xiaomi Poco F3, especially its lower price point and lighter weight, my usage pattern leans more toward the premium features, camera capabilities, the Apple ecosystem, and performance offered by the iPhone 16 Pro Max.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.