Xiaomi Poco C65 vs ZTE nubia Flip - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 6, 2023 April 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 106.14 cm³ 89.85 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 3.22 "/g
Weight 192 g 214 g
Height 168 mm 170 mm
Width 78 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple
  • Cosmic Black
  • Sunshine Gold
  • Flowering Lilac

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.9 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1188 x 2790
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.7 % 86.3 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 439 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 90.53 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.11 mAh/cm³ 47.97 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4310 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco C65ZTE nubia FlipPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions168 x 78 x 8.1 mm170 x 75.5 x 7 mmThe nubia Flip is slightly taller and narrower when unfolded, significantly thinner but wider when folded. Poco C65 is a traditional candybar design.
Weight192g214gNubia Flip is noticeably heavier, common for foldable phones.
FoldableNoYesNubia Flip offers a significantly smaller footprint when folded, enhancing portability.
Display
Size6.74"6.9"Nubia Flip offers a slightly larger screen real estate.
TypeIPS LCDFoldable OLEDOLED generally provides better contrast, deeper blacks, and wider viewing angles compared to IPS LCD. The foldable nature of the Nubia's display is a key differentiator.
Resolution720 x 16001188 x 2790Nubia Flip boasts a much sharper and more detailed display.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzNubia Flip will provide smoother animations and scrolling.
Brightness (Peak)600 nits (HBM)Not specifiedPoco C65's peak brightness is known, allowing for better visibility in direct sunlight. We cannot compare to the Nubia without its peak brightness spec.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 offers significantly better performance and efficiency due to its more advanced architecture and manufacturing process.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 has more powerful cores, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 644Adreno 644 offers a substantial improvement in graphics performance, beneficial for gaming and demanding applications.
RAM8GB8GBBoth phones have the same RAM, which should provide ample multitasking capabilities.
Storage256 GB256GBStorage capacity is equal in both devices.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4310 mAhPoco C65 has a larger battery capacity, potentially leading to longer battery life. However, the Nubia Flip's more efficient processor might offset this difference.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 13Both run on the same base OS. Long-term software updates are unknown for both devices.
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments and data transfer.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco C65 Advantages:

  • Longer potential battery life: The larger 5000mAh battery might provide longer usage time.
  • Lower Price: Belongs to a lower price range, offering better value for budget-conscious users.

ZTE nubia Flip Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 chipset offers superior performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher quality display: Foldable OLED with a higher resolution and refresh rate provides a more immersive and responsive visual experience.
  • More Compact when Folded: The foldable design offers better portability.

Trade-offs:

  • Nubia Flip - Price for Foldability: The innovative foldable design likely comes at a premium price compared to the Poco C65.
  • Poco C65 - Performance limitations: The Helio G85 might struggle with demanding tasks and games compared to the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco C65: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality, long battery life, and reliability. Suitable for everyday tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media.

ZTE nubia Flip: Best suited for users who value cutting-edge technology, a premium viewing experience, portability of a foldable phone, and have the budget for it. Ideal for users who consume a lot of media, multitask heavily, and appreciate a compact device.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco C65 is significantly more affordable.
  2. What level of performance do you need? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Nubia Flip is a clear winner.
  3. How important is portability and screen quality? The Nubia Flip's foldable design and OLED display offer significant advantages in these areas.

My Choice: ZTE nubia Flip

While the Xiaomi Poco C65 offers excellent value for its price, I would choose the ZTE nubia Flip. The superior performance of the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, combined with the stunning foldable OLED display and increased portability, outweighs the price difference and slightly smaller battery for me. The innovative form factor and high-quality display provide a significant upgrade in user experience. While battery life is a concern, the efficiency of the 7 Gen 1 might mitigate the smaller battery capacity compared to the Poco C65. I prioritize performance and a premium user experience, making the Nubia Flip the more compelling choice.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.