Xiaomi Poco C65 vs Xiaomi Redmi A3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 6, 2023 February 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 106.14 cm³ 106.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 192 g 193 g
Height 168 mm 168.3 mm
Width 78 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple
  • Midnight Black
  • Forest Green (Olive Green)
  • Star Blue (Lake Blue)

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.71 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.7 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits 500 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.11 mAh/cm³ 46.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco C65Xiaomi Redmi A3Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions168 x 78 x 8.1 mm168.3 x 76.3 x 8.3 mmRedmi A3 is slightly narrower and thicker. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight192g193gVirtually identical weight.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without more information.
Display
Size6.74"6.71"Negligible size difference.
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer similar color accuracy and viewing angles, expected in this price range.
Resolution720 x 1600720 x 1650Redmi A3 has a slightly higher resolution, but the difference in sharpness is minimal on this screen size.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness (typ)450 nitsNot specifiedPoco C65's specified typical brightness suggests better visibility in normal lighting. Can't definitively compare without Redmi A3's typical brightness.
Brightness (HBM)600 nits500 nitsPoco C65 likely offers better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Mediatek Helio G36 (12nm)G85 generally offers better CPU and GPU performance than the G36, resulting in smoother multitasking and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (8x2.2 GHz A53)Poco C65's CPU architecture with performance cores (A75) will provide noticeably faster performance for demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G52 MC2PowerVR GE8320Mali-G52 MC2 is significantly more powerful, leading to better gaming performance and smoother graphics rendering.
RAM8GB4GB/6GB8GB RAM in Poco C65 allows for better multitasking and app switching compared to the 4GB variant of Redmi A3. 6GB RAM on Redmi A3 is a decent middle ground.
Storage256GB128GBPoco C65 offers double the storage, allowing users to store more apps, photos, and videos.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery life expected, though actual usage will depend on individual usage patterns and software optimization.
Software
OSAndroid 13Android 14Redmi A3 comes with a newer Android version out of the box, potentially offering newer features and longer software support.
Other
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments and data transfer.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco C65 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Helio G85 chipset and more powerful GPU provide a smoother and more responsive user experience, especially for gaming and multitasking.
  • More RAM and Storage: The 8GB RAM and 256GB storage offer ample space for apps, files, and media.
  • Brighter Display: Higher peak brightness ensures better visibility outdoors.

Xiaomi Redmi A3 Advantages:

  • Newer Android Version: Ships with Android 14, potentially offering longer software updates and newer features.
  • Potentially More Affordable: While pricing isn't specified, Redmi A series typically targets the lowest price bracket. Different RAM/Storage configurations allow for price flexibility.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco C65: Users who prioritize performance for gaming, multitasking, or demanding applications. Also suitable for users who need ample storage.

Xiaomi Redmi A3: Users on a tight budget who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. The 6GB RAM variant provides a good balance for moderate usage.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A3 is likely cheaper, especially the 4GB RAM version.
  2. What is your primary phone usage? For demanding tasks, the Poco C65 is superior. For basic usage, the Redmi A3 is sufficient.
  3. How important is long-term software support? The Redmi A3's newer Android version might offer longer updates.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco C65

While the Redmi A3 might offer a slightly longer software update cycle and lower price (depending on the RAM/Storage version), the performance difference is significant enough to make the Poco C65 the better choice for me. The Helio G85, coupled with 8GB of RAM and 256GB storage, will provide a far smoother and more enjoyable user experience in the long run. I prioritize a responsive phone that can handle multitasking and occasional gaming without lag. The brighter display is a welcome bonus. Even if the Redmi A3 is cheaper, the performance limitations would likely lead to frustration over time. The value proposition of the Poco C65, with its superior performance and ample storage, outweighs the benefits of the Redmi A3 for my usage pattern.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.