Xiaomi Poco C65 vs Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 6, 2023 January 12, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 106.14 cm³ 98.98 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 192 g 186 g
Height 168 mm 160.5 mm
Width 78 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple
  • Black
  • Yellow
  • Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.7 % 90.1 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness 600 nits 1200 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.11 mAh/cm³ 50.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali G615-MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco C65Xiaomi Poco X6 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions168x78x8.1mm160.5x74.3x8.3mmPoco X6 Pro is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight192g186gPoco X6 Pro is slightly lighter.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder displayPreference-based, under-display is often perceived as more modern.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDX6 Pro offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially brighter colors.
Display Size6.74"6.67"Negligible size difference.
Resolution720x1600 (HD+)1220x2712 (FHD+)X6 Pro offers much sharper visuals due to higher resolution.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzX6 Pro will feel smoother in animations and scrolling.
Peak Brightness600 nits (HBM)1800 nits (peak)X6 Pro will be significantly more readable in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm)X6 Pro boasts a vastly more powerful and efficient processor, enabling smoother multitasking and demanding gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz A715 & 3x3.20 GHz A715 & 4x2.20 GHz A510)Significant performance difference in favor of the X6 Pro.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali G615-MC6X6 Pro provides a substantially better gaming and graphics rendering experience.
RAM/Storage8GB/256GB12GB/256GB or 12GB/512GBX6 Pro offers more RAM and storage options for smoother multitasking and ample file storage.
Camera
Video Capabilities1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@30fps with EISX6 Pro allows for higher resolution video recording with electronic image stabilization. No detailed camera specs are available for comparison beyond video capabilities.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacity, but the X6 Pro's more efficient chipset likely results in better battery life.
Software
OSAndroid 13Android 14X6 Pro comes with a newer Android version and guaranteed updates up to Android 17.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Poco C65 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Positioned in the low price range, offering affordability.

Poco X6 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor and GPU.
  • Better Display: Higher resolution AMOLED with a 120Hz refresh rate and much higher peak brightness.
  • More RAM and Storage: Improved multitasking and ample space for files.
  • Newer Software: Latest Android version with longer software update support.
  • Enhanced Video Recording: 4K recording capability with EIS.

Trade-offs:

  • The Poco X6 Pro's higher performance and features come at a significantly higher price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Poco C65: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality for calling, texting, web browsing, and social media.

Poco X6 Pro: Users who demand high performance for gaming, media consumption, multitasking, and photography/videography. Suitable for power users and those who value a premium display and long software update support.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco C65 is significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and gaming.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The X6 Pro offers a superior visual experience and smoother performance.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Usage: Poco C65
  • Demanding User, High Performance Needed: Poco X6 Pro
  • Balanced Needs, Value for Money: Consider other options in the mid-range segment, potentially offering a compromise between price and performance.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro

While the Poco C65 offers excellent value for its price, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner for me. The significantly improved performance, superior AMOLED display, future-proof software with longer updates, and enhanced video recording capabilities justify the higher price. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, a vibrant display for media consumption, and the longevity provided by extended software updates. The performance difference between the Helio G85 and the Dimensity 8300 Ultra is substantial, making the X6 Pro a more capable device for a wider range of tasks. While I acknowledge the budget constraints some users might have, the X6 Pro offers a more compelling overall package for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.