Xiaomi Poco C65 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 6, 2023 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 106.14 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 192 g 222 g
Height 168 mm 162.3 mm
Width 78 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.7 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.11 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco C65 vs. Samsung Galaxy M35: A Holistic Technological Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis goes beyond simple spec comparisons to provide a holistic understanding of the Poco C65 and Galaxy M35 within the broader mobile landscape.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping:

FeaturePoco C65Samsung Galaxy M35Technological ContextInnovation PotentialEcosystem IntegrationPerformance MetricsUser Experience Indicators
Launch Date2023-11-062024-05-24Indicates market positioning and potential access to latest software updates.LowMediumLowMedium
Price RangeLowMediumReflects target audience and expected feature set.LowMediumMediumMedium
Display6.74" IPS LCD, 90Hz6.6" Super AMOLED, 120HzAMOLED offers superior contrast and power efficiency; higher refresh rates enhance visual fluidity.MediumHighHighHigh
Resolution720x16001080x2340Higher resolution contributes to sharper image quality.LowHighHighHigh
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Exynos 1380 (5nm)Chipset fabrication process (nm) impacts power efficiency and performance.LowHighHighHigh
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)CPU architecture and clock speed determine processing power.LowHighHighHigh
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G68 MP5GPU influences graphics performance, especially in gaming and demanding applications.LowHighHighHigh
Battery5000 mAh6000 mAhBattery capacity directly impacts usage time.MediumMediumHighHigh
OSAndroid 13Android 14Newer OS versions generally offer improved features and security updates.MediumHighHighHigh
Camera (Video)1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fpsVideo capabilities reflect content creation potential.LowHighHighHigh

2. Strategic Technological Insights:

The Galaxy M35 embodies a more advanced technology stack aligned with current trends: a more efficient processor, superior display technology, larger battery, and enhanced video capabilities. The Poco C65 represents a budget-conscious approach, prioritizing affordability over cutting-edge features.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment:

The M35's superior specifications cater to users seeking a more premium experience, particularly those engaged in multimedia consumption and content creation. The Poco C65 targets users prioritizing basic functionality and cost-effectiveness.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework:

The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1380 positions the M35 for better long-term performance and efficiency compared to the 12nm Helio G85. Furthermore, the faster refresh rate and AMOLED display of the M35 will provide a significantly better user experience.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M35

While the Poco C65 offers an attractive price point, the Galaxy M35 provides a significantly more compelling package. Its superior processor, display, battery life, and camera capabilities translate to a substantially enhanced user experience. The more advanced technology within the M35 also ensures better future-proofing, aligning with the evolving mobile landscape. Though a "medium" price range, the long-term value proposition of the M35 outweighs the immediate cost savings of the Poco C65. The investment in the more powerful and feature-rich M35 is justified by its superior performance, longevity, and overall user experience.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.