Xiaomi Poco C65 vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 6, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 106.14 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 192 g 213 g
Height 168 mm 161.1 mm
Width 78 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.7 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.11 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco C65Samsung Galaxy A55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions168 x 78 x 8.1 mm161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mmA55 slightly smaller and thinner, potentially more comfortable to hold.
Weight192g213gPoco C65 noticeably lighter.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDA55 offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency.
Display Size6.74"6.6"Negligible size difference.
Resolution720 x 1600 (HD+)1080 x 2340 (FHD+)A55 significantly sharper and more detailed.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzA55 provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness600 nits (HBM)1000 nits (HBM)A55 will be much more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Exynos 1480 (4nm)A55's Exynos chip is significantly more powerful and efficient due to smaller process node. Expect smoother multitasking and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A55 has faster and more powerful CPU cores.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Xclipse 530A55 offers better graphics performance for gaming and demanding applications.
RAM8GB8GB/12GBA55 offers a 12GB RAM option for even smoother multitasking.
Storage256GB256GBEquivalent storage.
Camera
Rear CameraNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare camera quality and features.
Front CameraNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare camera quality and features.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fpsA55 capable of recording higher resolution and frame rate video.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacity, but A55's AMOLED display and efficient processor likely result in longer battery life.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 14A55 comes with a newer Android version and longer guaranteed updates (up to Android 18).
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments.
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTGA55 supports On-The-Go for connecting peripherals.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco C65 Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: Noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
  • Lower Price: Belongs to the "low price" range, making it more budget-friendly.

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology offers better colors, contrast, and outdoor visibility. Higher resolution and refresh rate provide a smoother and sharper experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: More powerful processor and GPU for smoother multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications.
  • More Advanced Camera Features: 4K video recording and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother videos.
  • Newer Software and Longer Support: Ships with Android 14 and guaranteed updates up to Android 18.
  • More Connectivity Options: USB OTG allows for connecting peripherals.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The A55's superior features come at a higher price ("medium price" range).

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco C65: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality, long battery life, and a lightweight device for calling, texting, and light web browsing.

Samsung Galaxy A55: Users who value a premium display, smooth performance, better camera features, and longer software support. Suitable for gaming, multimedia consumption, and multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco C65 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and multimedia.
  3. How important are display quality, performance, and camera features? The A55 excels in these areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A55

While the Poco C65 offers excellent value for its price, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the superior device overall. The significantly better display, more powerful performance, newer software with longer update support, and enhanced camera features justify the higher price for me. The improved user experience in everyday tasks, gaming, and multimedia consumption outweighs the slightly heavier weight. The longer software support also ensures a future-proof investment. While the specific camera details are missing, the ability to record 4K video is a significant advantage over 1080p. The 4nm processor in the A55 promises significant performance and efficiency gains over the 12nm processor in the Poco C65. These factors combined make the A55 a more compelling choice for a long-term investment.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.