Xiaomi Poco C65 vs Oppo Reno11 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 6, 2023 January 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 106.14 cm³ 95.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 3.68 "/g
Weight 192 g 182 g
Height 168 mm 162.4 mm
Width 78 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple
  • Wave Green
  • Rock Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.7 % 89.5 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.11 mAh/cm³ 52.45 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Xiaomi Poco C65 and the Oppo Reno11, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco C65Oppo Reno11Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions168 x 78 x 8.1 mm162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mmReno11 is slightly smaller and thinner, potentially more pocketable.
Weight192g182gReno11 feels lighter in hand.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality impacts durability and premium feel; information lacking here.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 90HzAMOLED, 120HzReno11 offers deeper blacks, vibrant colors, and smoother scrolling due to AMOLED and higher refresh rate.
Size6.74"6.7"Negligible size difference in real-world use.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2412Reno11 has a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images.
Peak Brightness600 nits950 nitsReno11's display will be much more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G85 (12nm)Dimensity 7050 (6nm)Reno11 boasts a more powerful and efficient processor, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Reno11's CPU has faster cores, translating to a noticeable performance boost.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G68 MC4Reno11's GPU offers superior graphics performance for demanding games and applications.
RAM8GB12GBReno11 can handle more apps in the background without slowdown.
Storage256GB256GBStorage is equal in both devices.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBattery life will depend on usage, but similar capacities suggest comparable longevity. Reno11's more efficient processor might provide a slight edge.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 14Reno11 ships with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages.
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments and data transfer.
Video Capabilities1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@30fps, slow-moReno11 offers significantly better video recording capabilities with higher resolution and slow-motion options.

2. Key Insights

The Oppo Reno11 is positioned as a clear step up from the Xiaomi Poco C65. Its advantages lie in a superior display (AMOLED, 120Hz, higher resolution and brightness), a significantly more powerful processor (Dimensity 7050), more RAM (12GB), a newer Android version (14), and enhanced video recording capabilities. The Reno11 also boasts a slightly more compact and lighter design.

The Xiaomi Poco C65, however, aims for affordability. While it lags in performance and display quality, it still offers a large screen, a sizable battery, and essential features like NFC.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco C65: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality over top-tier performance. Ideal for casual browsing, social media, and light gaming.
  • Reno11: Geared towards users who demand a smoother, more responsive experience with a vibrant display and strong gaming performance. Suitable for content creators, mobile gamers, and those who value a premium feel.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Poco C65 is a "low price" device, while the Reno11 falls in the "medium price" range.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? For casual use, the Poco C65 might suffice. For demanding tasks and gaming, the Reno11 is the better choice.
  3. How important is display quality? If a vibrant and sharp display is crucial, the Reno11's AMOLED screen is a significant advantage.

My Choice: I would choose the Oppo Reno11. While it comes at a higher price, the significantly improved performance, the stunning AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, and the superior camera capabilities are compelling. As someone who appreciates a fluid user experience and values future-proofing with the latest Android version, the Reno11 aligns better with my needs. The difference in chipset and display technology alone would make a significant difference in daily use. While the Poco C65 offers excellent value for its price, the Reno11 provides a more compelling overall package.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.