Xiaomi Poco C40 vs ZTE Blade V60 Design - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 17, 2022 June 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 119.52 cm³ 106.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 204 g 198 g
Height 169.6 mm 164.2 mm
Width 76.6 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Coral Green
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Champagne Gold
  • Dark Blue
  • Sunrise Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.71 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1650 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 268 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 133.26 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.2 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset JLQ JR510 (11 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC1 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco C40 vs. ZTE Blade V60 Design: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Xiaomi Poco C40 and the ZTE Blade V60 Design, two contenders in the budget smartphone arena. We'll go beyond the spec sheet to uncover what these devices offer in real-world use.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco C40ZTE Blade V60 DesignReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)169.6 x 76.6 x 9.2164.2 x 75.3 x 8.6V60 Design is slightly more compact and pocket-friendly.
Weight (g)204198Negligible weight difference in hand.
Fingerprint SensorRear-mountedSide-mountedPersonal preference; side-mounted often feels more ergonomic.
Display
Size (inches)6.716.6Poco C40 offers a marginally larger screen.
Resolution (px)720 x 1650720 x 1612Virtually identical visual clarity; both are HD+ but not as sharp as higher-resolution displays.
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDExpect good color reproduction but limited viewing angles and contrast compared to AMOLED.
Refresh Rate (Hz)60 (Standard)90V60 Design's 90Hz offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetJLQ JR510Unisoc T606T606 generally provides better CPU performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHzOcta-core 1.6 GHz (2x A75, 6x A55)V60 Design's architecture, with its A75 cores, could handle demanding tasks more effectively.
GPUMali-G57 MC1Mali-G57 MP1Similar graphical capabilities, but real-world gaming performance might vary.
RAM (GB)3/44/6More RAM options on the V60 Design, beneficial for multitasking.
OSAndroid 11Android 13V60 Design comes with a newer OS, offering potential feature and security advantages.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)1350Significant advantage for V60 Design in resolution; expect better detail and low-light performance.
Selfie Camera (MP)58V60 Design likely to produce better selfie quality.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)60005000Poco C40 boasts significantly higher battery capacity, promising longer usage time.
Charging (W)18W22.5WV60 Design charges faster despite the smaller battery.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The ZTE Blade V60 Design likely offers a smoother and more responsive user experience due to its more modern processor and higher refresh rate display. While the Poco C40's large battery is compelling, day-to-day tasks and app loading should be quicker on the V60 Design.
  • Camera: The 50MP main camera on the V60 Design is a clear winner. Expect significantly better image quality, especially in detail and low-light conditions. The improved selfie camera also gives the V60 Design an edge for social media enthusiasts.
  • Battery and Charging: While the Poco C40 has a massive 6000mAh battery, the V60 Design's 22.5W fast charging might compensate for the smaller 5000mAh capacity by topping up quicker. The Poco C40's advantage lies in sheer longevity, potentially lasting two days on a single charge with moderate use.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco C40: Ideal for users who prioritize battery life above all else. If you need a phone that can last for extended periods without charging, this is your pick. Great for light users, students, or anyone on a tight budget.
  • ZTE Blade V60 Design: Suited for users who value a more responsive and fluid experience. The better processor, faster refresh rate, and superior camera make it a stronger contender for everyday use, gaming, and social media.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your budget? Both phones are budget-friendly, but slight price variations might exist.
  2. What's your primary use? Heavy social media use, basic tasks, or long stretches without charging?
  3. Which features are non-negotiable? Camera quality, battery longevity, or overall performance?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited budget, maximum battery: Poco C40.
  • Balanced performance and modern features: ZTE Blade V60 Design.

My Choice: ZTE Blade V60 Design

While the Poco C40's gigantic battery is tempting, I'd choose the ZTE Blade V60 Design. The more powerful processor, 90Hz display, and significantly better camera system outweigh the battery advantage for me. Android 13 also ensures software updates and features for longer. I prioritize a smooth and responsive experience, and the V60 Design seems to deliver that without breaking the bank. The faster charging also mitigates the smaller battery capacity to some extent. Ultimately, the V60 Design feels like a more future-proof and well-rounded device for everyday use.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.