Xiaomi Poco C40 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 17, 2022 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 119.52 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 204 g 189 g
Height 169.6 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.6 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Coral Green
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.71 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1650 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 268 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 133.26 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.2 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset JLQ JR510 (11 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC1 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco C40 vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A Budget Battle Royale

Hello, fellow tech explorers! Today, we're diving deep into the world of budget smartphones, dissecting the Xiaomi Poco C40 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G. Both promise impressive features for their price, but which one truly delivers? Let's cut through the marketing jargon and uncover the real-world performance of these contenders.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco C40ZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)169.6 x 76.6 x 9.2164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6A75 slightly more compact, potentially easier for one-handed use.
Weight (g)204189A75 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue.
Display
Size (inches)6.716.6Both offer large screens for immersive media consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 1650720 x 1612Nearly identical; expect similar sharpness.
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDDecent color reproduction, but limited viewing angles.
Refresh Rate (Hz)-90A75's 90Hz offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetJLQ JR510Unisoc T606T606 generally offers better performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHzOcta-core 1.6 GHzPoco C40 may handle demanding tasks slightly better.
RAM (GB)44Sufficient for basic multitasking.
OSAndroid 11Android 13A75 benefits from newer OS features and security updates.
Camera
Rear Main (MP)1350A75's 50MP sensor likely captures more detail.
Selfie (MP)58A75 offers a higher resolution selfie camera.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)60005000Poco C40's larger battery likely lasts longer.
Charging (W)18W22.5WA75 supports faster charging.

2. Key Insights

The Poco C40 shines with its massive 6000mAh battery, promising exceptional endurance. While its JLQ JR510 processor might not be a powerhouse, it's adequate for everyday tasks. However, the older Android 11 and lower resolution cameras are drawbacks.

The ZTE Blade A75 4G, while boasting a smaller battery, compensates with a more modern Unisoc T606 chipset, Android 13, a higher resolution main camera, and a smoother 90Hz display. The faster charging is a welcome addition.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Poco C40: Ideal for users prioritizing battery life above all else. Light users, students, or those in areas with limited charging access would benefit most.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Suits users who value a more responsive and modern experience. The improved camera and smoother display make it a better choice for casual photography and media consumption.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your biggest priority: battery life or overall performance? If battery is king, the Poco C40 is your champion. If you desire a smoother, more modern experience, the A75 wins.

  2. How important is camera quality? The A75's 50MP sensor significantly outclasses the Poco C40's 13MP offering.

  3. Are you on a tight budget? Both phones are priced competitively, but minor price differences might exist depending on your region and storage options.

My Choice: I'd lean towards the ZTE Blade A75 4G. While the Poco C40's battery is tempting, the A75's superior performance, newer operating system, better camera, and faster charging offer a more well-rounded experience that aligns better with my needs. The slightly smaller battery is a trade-off I'm willing to make for the noticeable improvements in other areas. Ultimately, the A75 feels like a more future-proof device.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.