Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Xiaomi Poco X5 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 17, 2022 February 7, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 119.52 cm³ 101.13 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 204 g 189 g
Height 169.6 mm 165.9 mm
Width 76.6 mm 76.2 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Coral Green
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Jaguar Black
  • Wildcat Blue
  • Supernova Green

Display

Screen Size 6.71 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1650 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82 % 85 %
Pixel Density 268 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 700 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 133.26 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.2 mAh/cm³ 49.44 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset JLQ JR510 (11 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Mali-G57 MC1 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco C40 vs. Xiaomi Poco X5: A Deep Dive for the Discerning User

Hello fellow tech explorers! Alex Griffin here, ready to dissect the Xiaomi Poco C40 and the Poco X5. We'll go beyond the spec sheet and uncover what these phones really offer in terms of daily use. Let's get started!

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco C40Xiaomi Poco X5Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)169.6 x 76.6 x 9.2165.9 x 76.2 x 8C40 is slightly larger and thicker. X5 feels more premium.
Weight (g)204189C40 feels noticeably heavier in hand.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDX5 offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency. C40's LCD is decent but less vibrant.
Size (inches)6.716.67Negligible size difference. Both offer large screens for media consumption.
Resolution720 x 16501080 x 2400X5 boasts significantly sharper visuals due to higher resolution. C40's display might appear pixelated to some.
Refresh Rate (Hz)-120X5's 120Hz offers smoother scrolling and animations, a noticeable upgrade in responsiveness over the standard 60Hz likely in the C40.
Performance
ChipsetJLQ JR510Snapdragon 695 5GX5 delivers significantly faster processing power and smoother multitasking. C40 is suitable for basic tasks but might struggle with demanding apps or games.
CPUOcta-core (Cortex-A55)Octa-core (Kryo 660)X5's Kryo cores offer superior performance and efficiency compared to the C40's Cortex-A55 cores.
GPUMali-G57 MC1Adreno 619X5 provides a much better gaming experience and handles graphics-intensive tasks with ease.
RAM (GB)46/8 (depending on the version)X5's larger RAM enables better multitasking and app switching. C40 might experience slowdowns with multiple apps open.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)1348X5's higher resolution main camera captures more detail and offers better low-light performance.
Front Camera (MP)513Noticeable improvement in selfie quality with the X5.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)60005000C40's larger battery likely provides longer overall battery life. However, X5's AMOLED display and efficient processor could offset this difference.
Fast Charging18W33WX5 charges significantly faster, minimizing downtime.
Other
Price RangeLowMidC40 targets budget-conscious buyers, while X5 offers more premium features at a higher price.
5GNoYesFuture-proof connectivity with the X5.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Poco X5 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset and ample RAM provide a significantly smoother and more responsive experience. The C40, with its entry-level processor, is best suited for basic tasks.
  • Display: The X5's AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate provides a vibrant and fluid visual experience. The C40's LCD is functional but lacks the punch and smoothness of the X5.
  • Camera: While megapixels aren't everything, the X5's 48MP main camera offers superior detail and versatility compared to the C40's 13MP sensor.
  • Battery: The C40 boasts a larger battery, but the X5's efficient AMOLED display and faster charging could potentially balance things out in real-world usage.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco C40: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, web browsing, and light media consumption. Students or seniors on a tight budget might find this phone suitable.
  • Poco X5: Best for users who demand a smooth and responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, media consumption, and photography. Content creators, mobile gamers, and those seeking a future-proof device would appreciate the X5.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The C40 is significantly cheaper, while the X5 sits in the mid-range price bracket.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? For basic tasks, the C40 suffices. For demanding applications, the X5 is a better choice.
  3. How important is future-proofing? The X5's 5G connectivity ensures it remains relevant for longer.

My Choice: The Poco X5

While the Poco C40 offers excellent value for its price, I would choose the Poco X5. The superior performance, vibrant AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, and better camera system are compelling upgrades that significantly enhance the overall user experience. The jump to a mid-range price is justified by the significant leap in capabilities. As someone who values a smooth and responsive device for both work and leisure, the X5 aligns better with my needs. The added benefit of 5G future-proofs the investment.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.