Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Xiaomi Poco X4 GT - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 17, 2022 June 27, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 119.52 cm³ 108.18 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 204 g 200 g
Height 169.6 mm 163.6 mm
Width 76.6 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Coral Green
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.71 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1650 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 21:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 268 PPI 407 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 144 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 650 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 133.26 mAh/in² 116.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.2 mAh/cm³ 46.96 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5080 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset JLQ JR510 (11 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC1 Mali-G610 MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco C40 vs. Xiaomi Poco X4 GT: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Poco C40 and X4 GT, two Xiaomi phones targeting different ends of the market. We'll go beyond the spec sheet to understand what these differences mean for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco C40Xiaomi Poco X4 GTReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)169.6 x 76.6 x 9.2163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9C40 is larger, thicker. X4 GT is more pocketable.
Weight (g)204200Negligible difference in weight.
Display
Size (inches)6.716.6C40 offers a slightly larger screen.
Resolution720 x 16501080 x 2460X4 GT boasts significantly sharper visuals, better for media consumption and gaming.
Refresh Rate (Hz)-144X4 GT's high refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, more responsive gaming.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use LCD technology, but X4 GT supports HDR10 and Dolby Vision for enhanced color and contrast.
Performance
ChipsetJLQ JR510Dimensity 8100X4 GT's Dimensity 8100 is vastly more powerful, enabling seamless multitasking and demanding games.
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHzOcta-core 2.85 GHzX4 GT offers significantly faster processing speeds.
RAM (GB)48X4 GT's larger RAM allows for more apps to run in the background without performance slowdown.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)1364X4 GT's 64MP sensor captures much more detailed photos.
FeaturesBasicAdvancedX4 GT offers superior camera features like 4K video recording and Night Mode.Battery
Capacity (mAh)60005080C40 has a larger battery capacity, potentially lasting longer on a single charge.
Fast Charging (W)1867X4 GT charges significantly faster.
Price RangeLowMediumC40 is a budget-friendly option, while X4 GT sits in the mid-range segment.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance Chasm: The X4 GT's Dimensity 8100 obliterates the C40's JR510 in performance. This translates to a noticeably smoother and faster experience across the board, from app loading to gaming.
  • Display Quality: While both have LCD screens, the X4 GT's higher resolution and 144Hz refresh rate deliver a vastly superior visual experience. Gaming and media consumption are far more enjoyable on the X4 GT.
  • Battery Life vs. Charging Speed: The C40 boasts a massive 6000mAh battery, aimed at all-day endurance. However, the X4 GT, with its 67W fast charging, can replenish its smaller battery incredibly quickly. This trade-off prioritizes convenience over sheer longevity.
  • Camera Prowess: The X4 GT's 64MP main camera and advanced features like Night Mode trounce the C40's basic camera setup. If photography is a priority, the X4 GT is the clear winner.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco C40: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and basic functionality. Suitable for calling, texting, browsing, and light social media use. Students or seniors on a tight budget might find this appealing.
  • Poco X4 GT: Perfect for power users, gamers, and multimedia enthusiasts. Those who demand smooth performance, a vibrant display, and a capable camera will appreciate the X4 GT's capabilities.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The C40 is for those seeking the absolute lowest price, while the X4 GT commands a higher price for its superior features.
  • What are your primary use cases? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications like gaming and photography will heavily influence your choice.
  • How important is performance and display quality? If a smooth, responsive experience and a sharp display are paramount, the X4 GT is the better option.

My Choice: I would choose the Poco X4 GT. While the C40 offers impressive battery life for its price, the X4 GT's superior performance, display, and camera make it a much more versatile and enjoyable device to use. The faster charging mitigates the smaller battery capacity for me. I value a smooth, responsive experience and a good quality display, making the X4 GT the clear winner in my book. The price difference is justifiable for the significant jump in overall quality and capabilities.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.